• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Morgan Stanley, HSBC Trust and Distributors

pweesng

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hi Guys,

Just for discussion sake, and perhaps any lurking lawyers can advise as well.

For those who had invested in the Pinnacles Note Series 1 to 10, you would have been informed that there has been a credit default situation (9 and 10 with mandatory redemption event) occurring with 5 entities:-

1) Lehman Brothers
2) Fanny Mae
3) Freddie Mac
4) 2 icelandic banks

My question is this, since Fanny and Freddie is directly under the control of the US Goverment and has been fulfilling its obligation in terms of coupon payment and principle redemption, can Morgan Stanley declare a credit default situation?

Secondly, as individuals writing to the arranger (in this case woudl be Morgan Stanley) they may not address our concern. Why isn't the trustee who is suppose to act on behalf of the note holders asking the arranger the same questions?

Thirdly, do you think the distributors has a responsibility to track such events on behalf of the investors?

all views are welcome. but please keep it friendly and useful.

thanks heaps

pweesng
 
Z

Zombie

Guest
In the prospectus,

Mandatory Redemption =>
if any or all of the underlying assets......
 
Top