• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Many High SES Conned Millions by AMDK Bank Credit Suisse!

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal

Credit Suisse AT1 bondholders who lost US$1.7 billion in UBS deal file lawsuits​

TUE, MAY 02, 2023 - 07:50 PM

UPDATED WED, MAY 03, 2023 - 9:10 AM

Credit Suisse Group

Follow

You can now personalise your BT experience with keywords.
GOT IT.

This was an abuse of process and the resolution procedure should not be used by Switzerland to enable UBS to take over Credit Suisse to the detriment of AT1 holders,” Law firm Pallas founder and managing partner Natasha Harrison said in a statement.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
HUNDREDS more Credit Suisse Group bondholders sued Switzerland’s banking regulator after their securities valued at about US$1.7 billion were wiped out during the lender’s government-brokered takeover by UBS Group.
Law firm Pallas Partners, which filed the suit in a Swiss court on Apr 18, said the Finma agency had no right to order the writedown and is seeking full compensation for its clients – 90 institutional investors and asset managers with US$1.35 billion in so-called additional tier-1 bonds (AT1), as well as 700 retail and family office clients accounting for some US$300 million.
“This was an abuse of process and the resolution procedure should not be used by Switzerland to enable UBS to take over Credit Suisse to the detriment of AT1 holders,” Pallas founder and managing partner Natasha Harrison said in a statement.

The latest claims mean that investors representing more than a third of the US$17 billion in AT1 bonds issued by Credit Suisse have now sought to get their money back. US law firm Quinn Emmanuel last month filed a claim in Swiss court representing more than 400 institutional investors who held about US$4.5 billion worth of AT1s, and at least two other complaints have been filed.
Created after the 2008 financial crisis, AT1s are the lowest rung of bank debt, producing juicy returns in good times but taking the first hit when a bank runs into trouble. Even shareholders – often the first domino to fall in such situations – salvaged some value from the takeover engineered by Swiss authorities, while Credit Suisse’s AT1 holders walked away with nothing. Many bondholders were furious at the move. European regulators hurried to reassure investors that the Swiss arrangement was an exception.
Claims on Credit Suisse’s AT1 notes have been quoted at around five cents on the euro in recent weeks, according to people with knowledge of the pricing.

SEE ALSO​

Saudi National Bank to hold 0.5% of UBS after Credit Suisse merger

GET BT IN YOUR INBOX DAILY​

generic_newsletter.png

Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.

Sign Up
VIEW ALL

icon-btfeedback-white.svg

Your feedback is important to us
Tell us what you think. Email us at [email protected]

Bondholders have argued that changing the law the day before the notes were written off was unfair and that a process upending the conventions of an insolvency where bondholders take priority over shareholders is wrong.
However, Finma’s move was covered by emergency legislation enacted the weekend of March 18-19 the deal to rescue Credit Suisse was put together. Defenders of the writedown also point to the fact that the fine print on the bonds always warned that the risk of a writedown to zero was a possibility.
Finma declined to comment on the Pallas lawsuit. It has previously published its position on the writedown, explaining that it was part of a takeover plan that was the least bad option after Finma and the government rejected a resolution of Credit Suisse or temporary nationalisation.
Further lawsuits are expected this week as UBS races to complete the deal. Some law firms have interpreted the 30-day deadline for suits to be April 18, while others believe the 30-day rule to be only working days.
UBS chairman Colm Kelleher has said he plans to finalise the takeover this quarter, specifically in May. BLOOMBERG
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
UBS can pay them back la
Avoid all the suite

UBS has already taken CS in price discount.
AMDK really waste of time.
 
Top