IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
My view on this, is not whether sex has occurred, in which there is no presumptions, it had!, my point is, the girls these days are not INNOCENT as in the past.....say 20 years back, & it is utterly unfair to shame the men...the girl must be shamed too...we are too presumptuous that she is a "forced" party....I am very sure they commercially gain from all "opening their legs"..shame them too!!
The point is to curb the demand to kill the supply. If there is demand, the supply will still flow, whether the minor is willing or unwilling to open legs. Target and punish the itchy cocks to curb the demand. Laws prohibit disclosure of minor's identity. How to shame them? Shaming the men is more effective. Those with itchy cocks, just make sure the girl is not a minor and you can have your fun.
That means all the other accused who pled guilty instead of going to trial must be bang balls like fuck now. They did not realize can fight it and win.
That means all the other accused who pled guilty instead of going to trial must be bang balls like fuck now. They did not realize can fight it and win.
Not true. Some people claimed trial and entered a not guilty plea, but they were still convicted.
They key is to convince the judge that you did not have sex with her. If your story doesn't hold up to scrutiny and/or the gal refuses to corroborate, you are screwed.
Have you heard how young girls are forced into vice activities by their boyfriends or sugar daddy? Young girls are entrapped and then forced into prostitution. Do you really believe they do it willingly if they are not forced?
The point is to curb the demand to kill the supply. If there is demand, the supply will still flow, whether the minor is willing or unwilling to open legs. Target and punish the itchy cocks to curb the demand. Laws prohibit disclosure of minor's identity. How to shame them? Shaming the men is more effective. Those with itchy cocks, just make sure the girl is not a minor and you can have your fun.
You still pulling wool over eyes, deflecting the point of SHAMING THOSE GIRLS THAT OPEN THEIR LEGS FOR MONEY...only men fuck?? comE off it! this is the 21st century, with technology...we have the internet, devices that have access to it, smarphones etc...girls of 11..have seen a "bird"...& by 12 or 13, even tasted one...by secondary one...may even have one "put in" her...you know where....SHAME THOSE GIRLS...who not only have itchy holes...but make use of that to MAKE MONEY..as well as the MEN who seek such holes...