Even Solo does not belong to the self-styled Sultan, what more Sabah? Please read up before making assumptions.
He may own hectares of land but he does not own the territory.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Malaysian Minister with a cheebye mouth!
- Thread starter BuiKia
- Start date
Even Solo does not belong to the self-styled Sultan, what more Sabah? Please read up before making assumptions.
He may own hectares of land but he does not own the territory.
Geopolitical boundaries had always been changing throughout human civilisation for the past few thousands years. If we go by historical basis as benchmark, there will be full of overlapping claims and where exactly do we draw the line? Ownership of land are broadly determined in 4 ways.
1. First discovery
2. Transfer of ownership (through negotiation)
3. War and conquest
4. Through International arbitration.
The Sabah dispute falls under point no.2. The brits claimed that Sulu Sultan ceded Sabah to them and they in turn transferred the ownership of Sabah to the then newly formed Malaysia Federation. The Pinoy in order to have a case against Malaysia need to prove that Sabah was leased to the British and not ceded.
1. First discovery
2. Transfer of ownership (through negotiation)
3. War and conquest
4. Through International arbitration.
The Sabah dispute falls under point no.2. The brits claimed that Sulu Sultan ceded Sabah to them and they in turn transferred the ownership of Sabah to the then newly formed Malaysia Federation. The Pinoy in order to have a case against Malaysia need to prove that Sabah was leased to the British and not ceded.
Last edited:
Then the fucker should said. Malaysia belong to Orang Asli and US belong to Red Indian. SG also belong to Orang Asli.
I think he is very right,that also means that Malaysia also belongs to Singapore !
Typical mudland behaviour push blame drag us into m&d. Whole sulu shit smells fishy jus like the Mongolian pussy.
Yes, they will say that Parameswara alias Megat Iskandar Shah founded Malacca as a Hindu Prince of Palembang and it was from his ascension to the Malacca throne the Muslim Malay Kingdom took off until the arrival of the Portuguese (Bengali Puteh), Dutch and finally the British and then UMNO?
Was Sukarno right then in declaring the Konfrontasi?
Similar threads
