Re: Will LKY rise from the dead?
That's what I meant.. compare with the rest he really stands out
That's what I meant.. compare with the rest he really stands out
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
LKY Condemnation Thread - Post 23 March 2015
- Thread starter gingerlyn
- Start date
-
- Tags
- pap regime
Re: Martyn See: I don't see any public bereavement for LKY
Look at that 'Ang Mo'..grandson
Even the picture frame is too heavy for him to share in carrying it!
Actually that Gay Loong should be the one carrying the picture...
Too Gay or too proud to be seen as a PM to be carrying the frame?
Or is it the picture still frightens him? LoL
Look at that 'Ang Mo'..grandson
Even the picture frame is too heavy for him to share in carrying it!
Actually that Gay Loong should be the one carrying the picture...
Too Gay or too proud to be seen as a PM to be carrying the frame?
Or is it the picture still frightens him? LoL
Re: Will LKY rise from the dead?
Maybe my eyesight fail me....I see pictures of people prostrating on the floor, wailing....if that is not praying to some deity..what is? A Solemn bow for person who has done us good will do...
Maybe my eyesight fail me....I see pictures of people prostrating on the floor, wailing....if that is not praying to some deity..what is? A Solemn bow for person who has done us good will do...
Re: Martyn See: I don't see any public bereavement for LKY
The thai king wouldn't come even if he wasn't sick.
Send his lapdog premier can already. I doubt even the crowd peince would give face and turn up
I think the Thai King will not make it for the funeral... he's too weak.
At least he outlived LKY.
The thai king wouldn't come even if he wasn't sick.
Send his lapdog premier can already. I doubt even the crowd peince would give face and turn up
Tony Tan’s Propaganda about our History is a Joke
25 Mar
Tony Tan’s Propaganda about our History is a Joke
Share/Bookmark
PAP should cease wasting tax dollars on its propaganda because it is no longer effective in the internet age.
This is also an insult to citizens and will invite even more ridicule. Unless PAP doesn’t mind becoming a laughing stock.
How ineffective is propaganda? Just listen the the nonsensical factual errors spouted by our taxpayer-funded President Tony Tan about Lee Kuan Yew.
He began his speech by claiming “….Yesterday, we lost the founding father of Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew.”
According to Wikipedia, the “founding of modern Singapore” was between “1819 – 1826”, at least 196 years ago. Lee Kuan Yew was only 91 when he died so Lee couldn’t have qualified to be even the founding father of modern Singapore.
Source
Going a little further back, “the written history of Singapore dates back to the third century”, some 1800 years ago. Is Lee a reincarnation then? Why was Tony Tan so certain about Lee being the founding father of Singapore?
Whichever way one looks at his statement, Lee is not, and never will, be the founding father of Singapore. Perhaps PAP considering editing our school history books?
Tony: “Mr Lee Kuan Yew dedicated his entire life to Singapore.” Lee was able to ‘dedicate’ his entire life because the PAP had instilled fear in citizens by imprisoning and bankrupting political opponents, constantly gerrymandered and implemented the GRC system, abused the civil service and grassroots, etc to perpetuate its power. Without the GRC system, who would have voted for those PAP clowns which helped PAP to remain in power? Serving the people was only incidental.
This can be confirmed by Lee who once said, “If nobody is afraid of me, I’m meaningless”. Lee’s objective has always been to instill fear in order to gain total control. That gave meaning to his life. By pricing ‘dedication’ at million$, it appears to be more of a rip off. What do you think?
Tony: “He rallied colleagues, built up a capable civil service and led the founding generation of Singaporeans to achieve this vision.” But from our experience of PAP-created issues, we know that Tony was trying to take us for a ride. It was true during the first couple of decades with competent men assisting Lee but certainly not with clowns during the past 3 decades. Questions for Tony Tan:
– The majority of Singaporeans are not able to retire despite having a ‘capable’ civil service tweaking our CPF for decades. Was this Lee’s vision?
– Ordinary citizens, mostly dual income families, require 25 to 30 years to pay off their last HDB mortgage installment. Another one of Lee’s vision?
– The civil service is devoid of any idea to generate economic growth other than by increasing foreign labour/foreigner population. Did Lee contribute to building up such a ‘capable’ civil service?
– Three decades ago, the PAP told Singaporeans our HDB flats were our assets. Was it Lee’s vision that most citizens would have to sell our assets to fund our retirement?
– Almost 55,000 Singaporeans have to eke out a living as cleaners and thousands more as security guards in our ‘wealthy’ country. Was this Lee’s vision?
But we certainly know what a ‘capable’ civil service has done ie profit from citizens from public housing, public healthcare, COE, GST, fees, etc. Did Lee have any part in building up such a ‘capable’ civil service?
Tony is right to state that “many of his (Lee’s) ideas for Singapore live on”. These brilliant ideas include muzzling free speech, control of the civil service which could be used against opposition parties, the use of lawsuits against citizens, etc. Lee’s idea was to do whatever the PAP wants, never mind what the people think.
Tony: “Mr Lee’s passing is a great loss to all of us”. Try telling this to fellow citizens who were jailed without trial. Lee’s passing is a great loss to only those who had benefited disproportionately from Lee’s system of total control.
Tony says we should continue building on Lee’s “legacy” without objectively defining what has been left behind by Lee. Is it a political system which has been corrupted by greed? One which parliamentarians are blind to the elephant in the room?
Giving credit where credit is due to Lee Kuan Yew is fine. But Tony should know this is not the time to joke about our history.
Phillip Ang
*Article first appeared on http://bit.Iy/19NYc6R…
25 Mar
Tony Tan’s Propaganda about our History is a Joke
Share/Bookmark
PAP should cease wasting tax dollars on its propaganda because it is no longer effective in the internet age.
This is also an insult to citizens and will invite even more ridicule. Unless PAP doesn’t mind becoming a laughing stock.
How ineffective is propaganda? Just listen the the nonsensical factual errors spouted by our taxpayer-funded President Tony Tan about Lee Kuan Yew.
He began his speech by claiming “….Yesterday, we lost the founding father of Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew.”
According to Wikipedia, the “founding of modern Singapore” was between “1819 – 1826”, at least 196 years ago. Lee Kuan Yew was only 91 when he died so Lee couldn’t have qualified to be even the founding father of modern Singapore.
Source
Going a little further back, “the written history of Singapore dates back to the third century”, some 1800 years ago. Is Lee a reincarnation then? Why was Tony Tan so certain about Lee being the founding father of Singapore?
Whichever way one looks at his statement, Lee is not, and never will, be the founding father of Singapore. Perhaps PAP considering editing our school history books?
Tony: “Mr Lee Kuan Yew dedicated his entire life to Singapore.” Lee was able to ‘dedicate’ his entire life because the PAP had instilled fear in citizens by imprisoning and bankrupting political opponents, constantly gerrymandered and implemented the GRC system, abused the civil service and grassroots, etc to perpetuate its power. Without the GRC system, who would have voted for those PAP clowns which helped PAP to remain in power? Serving the people was only incidental.
This can be confirmed by Lee who once said, “If nobody is afraid of me, I’m meaningless”. Lee’s objective has always been to instill fear in order to gain total control. That gave meaning to his life. By pricing ‘dedication’ at million$, it appears to be more of a rip off. What do you think?
Tony: “He rallied colleagues, built up a capable civil service and led the founding generation of Singaporeans to achieve this vision.” But from our experience of PAP-created issues, we know that Tony was trying to take us for a ride. It was true during the first couple of decades with competent men assisting Lee but certainly not with clowns during the past 3 decades. Questions for Tony Tan:
– The majority of Singaporeans are not able to retire despite having a ‘capable’ civil service tweaking our CPF for decades. Was this Lee’s vision?
– Ordinary citizens, mostly dual income families, require 25 to 30 years to pay off their last HDB mortgage installment. Another one of Lee’s vision?
– The civil service is devoid of any idea to generate economic growth other than by increasing foreign labour/foreigner population. Did Lee contribute to building up such a ‘capable’ civil service?
– Three decades ago, the PAP told Singaporeans our HDB flats were our assets. Was it Lee’s vision that most citizens would have to sell our assets to fund our retirement?
– Almost 55,000 Singaporeans have to eke out a living as cleaners and thousands more as security guards in our ‘wealthy’ country. Was this Lee’s vision?
But we certainly know what a ‘capable’ civil service has done ie profit from citizens from public housing, public healthcare, COE, GST, fees, etc. Did Lee have any part in building up such a ‘capable’ civil service?
Tony is right to state that “many of his (Lee’s) ideas for Singapore live on”. These brilliant ideas include muzzling free speech, control of the civil service which could be used against opposition parties, the use of lawsuits against citizens, etc. Lee’s idea was to do whatever the PAP wants, never mind what the people think.
Tony: “Mr Lee’s passing is a great loss to all of us”. Try telling this to fellow citizens who were jailed without trial. Lee’s passing is a great loss to only those who had benefited disproportionately from Lee’s system of total control.
Tony says we should continue building on Lee’s “legacy” without objectively defining what has been left behind by Lee. Is it a political system which has been corrupted by greed? One which parliamentarians are blind to the elephant in the room?
Giving credit where credit is due to Lee Kuan Yew is fine. But Tony should know this is not the time to joke about our history.
Phillip Ang
*Article first appeared on http://bit.Iy/19NYc6R…
Re: Tony Tan’s Propaganda about our History is a Joke
Bro laksaboy ,
Please post the famiLEE tree :p
Show everyone here why it's a famiLEE business
Bro laksaboy ,
Please post the famiLEE tree :p
Show everyone here why it's a famiLEE business
Re: Martyn See: I don't see any public bereavement for LKY
What you see here are probably one of the wealthiest people in the world
The Suhartos/Marcos of Spore:o
What you see here are probably one of the wealthiest people in the world
The Suhartos/Marcos of Spore:o
Re: Martyn See: I don't see any public bereavement for LKY
Mahathir probably has nothing good to say about him so it's better to keep quiet to respect the dead.
Mahathir probably has nothing good to say about him so it's better to keep quiet to respect the dead.
Re: Tony Tan’s Propaganda about our History is a Joke
like it or not. LKY might be the biggest asshole while he was alive. whether he took Singapore out of Malaysia or Singapore was kicked out from Malaysia. it doesn't change the fact that LKY was the founding father of the Republic of Singapore. Raffles was the founder of the British colony of Singapore.
like it or not. LKY might be the biggest asshole while he was alive. whether he took Singapore out of Malaysia or Singapore was kicked out from Malaysia. it doesn't change the fact that LKY was the founding father of the Republic of Singapore. Raffles was the founder of the British colony of Singapore.
Re: Martyn See: I don't see any public bereavement for LKY
Suharto family combined with Marcos also smell no smoke.....
The are of the Waltons (Walmart) level.....
What you see here are probably one of the wealthiest people in the world
The Suhartos/Marcos of Spore:o
Suharto family combined with Marcos also smell no smoke.....
The are of the Waltons (Walmart) level.....
Re: Martyn See: I don't see any public bereavement for LKY
Only regional leaders.....
ASEAN countries plus a few neighbors like Aussie and India. Chinks probably sending some low level small fry
Only regional leaders.....
ASEAN countries plus a few neighbors like Aussie and India. Chinks probably sending some low level small fry
What is Old Man doing now ?? .....
.... chatting with Vic Morrow, Noel Tomorrow and Andre The Giant !:o
.... chatting with Vic Morrow, Noel Tomorrow and Andre The Giant !:o
night cabbies still screwed by ghost of LKY since last nite
The 24Hrs operations of SMRT SBS Buses n Trains n LRTs, screwed night cabbies income. They lost their usual customers to ghost of LKY. 24HRS Ghost MRT n Bus n LRT from LKY ghost.
LOL
The 24Hrs operations of SMRT SBS Buses n Trains n LRTs, screwed night cabbies income. They lost their usual customers to ghost of LKY. 24HRS Ghost MRT n Bus n LRT from LKY ghost.
LOL
Re: Will LKY rise from the dead?
Bloody ignorant Korean Press! For fuck sake, Oxley Road house which is heavily guarded by Gurkhas is just for show to create diversion.
He and Gecko had been living in a bungalow specially built for him since the early 1970's.
Bloody ignorant Korean Press! For fuck sake, Oxley Road house which is heavily guarded by Gurkhas is just for show to create diversion.
He and Gecko had been living in a bungalow specially built for him since the early 1970's.