• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Laid offs from 70% or 30%?

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
PMETs made up 71% of those affected as workers found it more difficult to get new jobs

SINGAPORE — The number of workers laid off last year spiked 20.5 per cent compared with 2014, reaching 15,580 — the highest number since the global financial crisis seven years ago, the latest Ministry of Manpower labour market report showed on Tuesday (March 15).

In 2009, the number of redundancies reached more than 23,000. The majority of last year’s lay-offs were in the services sector (55 per cent), where the financial services, wholesale trade and professional services were worst hit. Correspondingly, professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) made up 71 per cent of those laid off last year, up from 66 per cent in 2014.

The financial services sector — which had been hit by news of job cuts announced by global banks, affecting employees here — shed 1,710 jobs last year, compared to 1,280 in 2014. Over the same period, the number of workers laid off in wholesale trade climbed from 1,490 to 2,150, while job losses for those in professional services — including doctors, lawyers and accountants — rose from 1,520 to 2,290.

Workers who were laid off also found it more difficult to get a new job last year: Based on Central Provident Fund records, half of the residents made redundant in the third quarter of last year managed to secure employment by December, down from 55 per cent in the previous quarter, and 59 per cent in the same period in 2014.

MOM said it expects redundancies to continue to rise in sectors facing weak external demand and those that are undergoing restructuring. Domestic-oriented services sector will continue to need workers, the ministry said. “MOM is closely monitoring the current economic and labour market situation, and is strengthening employment support to help displaced locals re-enter employment,” it added.


(Click to enlarge)

Economists told TODAY that the slower global economic growth and the downturns in manufacturing as well as the oil and gas sectors have had a spillover effect into the services sector.

DBS Bank senior economist Irvin Seah said the slump in oil prices not only affect oil rig builders but the entire supply chain including smaller companies that support the oil and gas sector. The financial services sector would continue to see more job losses compared to other segments as it is going through some consolidation, Mr Seah said. As far as the labour market is concerned, the worst is yet to come as the global economic outlook deteriorates, he cautioned.

CIMB Private Banking economist Song Seng Wun said that while lay-offs may not necessarily increase over the year with some sectors still hiring, the pace of hiring may slow and this could push the unemployment rate up. “I would expect job seekers to take even longer to find a new job in the year head. Businesses may not be laying off more workers but they may not be that in a hurry to hire,” Mr Song said.

Unemployment rate for residents was 2.8 per cent last year, inching up from 2.7 per cent in 2014, while that for citizens remained unchanged at 2.9 per cent.

Mr Seah noted that the foreigners has borne the brunt of the job losses so far. “Companies are unwilling to let go of local workers because of the low foreign worker dependency ratio ceiling,” he said.

On the high proportion of PMETs laid off last year, Members of Parliament (MPs) from the labour movement attributed it to the fact that this group of workers comprise a higher percentage of the total workforce. Still, NTUC assistant secretary-general Patrick Tay, who is also an MP for West Coast GRC, said he was particularly concerned about PMETs above 40 years old, who would have a harder time finding a new job if they are retrenched.

Mr Tay, who co-chairs the Financial Sector Tripartite Committee which helps professionals seeking to find new jobs in the sector, suggested adopting a sectoral approach to provide more targeted and focused help in sectors where affected by high job losses.

Last month, the Association of Banks in Singapore announced that it has initiated a jobs portal that allows its members to refer their staff for suitable positions in other banks.

NTUC director of youth development Desmond Choo, who is an MP for Tampines GRC, said more efforts are needed to help PMETs. “We need to be able to re-skill, re-tool them (to join) other growing sectors … like healthcare and ICT (information communication technology),” said Mr Choo. More could also be done to provide “hardship support” for the families of retrenched PMETs while they look for a job, he added.

Advanced data released by MOM in January showed that Singapore saw its worst year-on-year employment growth since 2003 last year.

Confirming the labour market’s sluggish performance, the latest MOM report said that excluding foreign domestic workers, total employment grew by 23,300 – or 0.7 per cent – last year, compared to increases of 122,100 (3.7 per cent) and 131,300 (4.2 per cent) in 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The growth in local employment was flat: Only 700 of the jobs added were filled last year by Singaporeans and Permanent Residents, compared to 96,000 and 82,900 in 2014 and 2013 respectively.
 
Last edited:

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
This is good news for our local economy. Retrenchment allows company to get rid of the dead weight and make the remaining workers shape up. It also allows the company the chance to reorganize for better future success. A wise politician once said that if there were no retrenchment, he would be worried.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
End of this month, I would be retrenching two sinkies from my company and replacing them with a Pinoy and Indian national for about 65% of the two sinkies current salaries. Retrenchment is good!
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Out goes the old and expensive in comes the cheaper and young.

And foreign too?

Wish we could say this about the expensive government we have, we have been voted the most expensive city in 2016...out goes the horny & expensive....:rolleyes:
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
why dont we just cut the salaries of the top officials by half,the amount of money saved should help to boost the economy and help create at least 15,000 new jobs every year.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
End of this month, I would be retrenching two sinkies from my company and replacing them with a Pinoy and Indian national for about 65% of the two sinkies current salaries. Retrenchment is good!

u must be 10 years too late,i thought every company hires 90 percent pinoys and indian nationals by now.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
why dont we just cut the salaries of the top officials by half,the amount of money saved should help to boost the economy and help create at least 15,000 new jobs every year.

Because the top people in the private and public sectors are the talented people. It goes against common sense to punish the talented and capable just to make the incompetent folks at the bottom feel a bit happier.

The poor get their pay cut and their jobs threatened by even cheaper workers because what they do is of low quality low skill, the kind that can be done by someone cheaper, someone younger and faster.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Because the top people in the private and public sectors are the talented people. It goes against common sense to punish the talented and capable just to make the incompetent folks at the bottom feel a bit happier.....

If the top was talented they wouldn't have to lay off so many people.

Just look at Apple. They are still hiring & expanding because they are careful about $.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Because the top people in the private and public sectors are the talented people. It goes against common sense to punish the talented and capable just to make the incompetent folks at the bottom feel a bit happier.

The poor get their pay cut and their jobs threatened by even cheaper workers because what they do is of low quality low skill, the kind that can be done by someone cheaper, someone younger and faster.

i have no qualms against the top people in the private sector,market forces will determine whether or not they are up to the job,most people at the top of industry are proven by results and cutthroat competition.the only problems i have are the leeches in public sector who claims they are talented.if they are talented,all the more they should be released to the private to generate growth and create new industries as much as possible,not in pointless administrative posts as parachuted glcs ceos.....but i highly doubt these worthless administrators sinkies can do anything.......they dont even make good ceos let alone,entreprenuers,businessmen,industrialists or capitalists.the government should have as little to do with the free market and the economy as possible,top down administrations and state run economies only create massive waste and inefficiencies and suck up precious resources and capital and human energy and generate huge amounts of nepotism and cronyism.
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
... Last month, the Association of Banks in Singapore announced that it has initiated a jobs portal that allows its members to refer their staff for suitable positions in other banks. ...
ya ... u can haf our fat n deadwood ...

can eat dun waste, man! ...
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is good news for our local economy. Retrenchment allows company to get rid of the dead weight and make the remaining workers shape up. It also allows the company the chance to reorganize for better future success. A wise politician once said that if there were no retrenchment, he would be worried.

We need to get rid of dead wood in government first. So how can that be done? Not through election as we have known for the last 5 decades. Revolution?
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The question is why are there so still so many foreigners here despite the high unemployment of sinkees.

Why the WP MPs don't ask this question which every sinkee is thinking about? PAP MPs don't ask, we understand. Opposition MPs tiam tiam is totally unforgivable.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
The question is why are there so still so many foreigners here despite the high unemployment of sinkees.

Why the WP MPs don't ask this question which every sinkee is thinking about? PAP MPs don't ask, we understand. Opposition MPs tiam tiam is totally unforgivable.

Because public sector monopolize the best talents lah! So end up unscholarly sinkies and talented foreigners in private sector. Thank goodness for ERP not breaking down every morning.
 

Viber

Alfrescian
Loyal
Because public sector monopolize the best talents lah! So end up unscholarly sinkies and talented foreigners in private sector. Thank goodness for ERP not breaking down every morning.

what's wrong with making more money? :confused:
 

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
"Over the same period, the number of workers laid off in wholesale trade climbed from 1,490 to 2,150, while job losses for those in professional services — including doctors, lawyers and accountants — rose from 1,520 to 2,290."

All replaced by Ah Neh and Pinoy?
 
Top