• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

KEE CHIU FUCKs AH JUAN!!!

Cerebral

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
YOU ALL CANNOT UNDERSTAND The FUCK IS IT.
what is the point of having strongest opposition party when it has no intention to check on the gov.
look at what the fuck chiam has done in paliment?
talk about liftupgarding and hdb upgrading?
attend wake in potor pasay?wtf
CSJ might have lose..but what he convey is national topic..not lift upgrading

So much anger
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

In a sharply-worded statement, Huffington Post has responded to Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing.

This after Minister Chan chastised the publication in a statement on Jan. 15, 2015, for giving Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) Chee Soon Juan “considerable but undeserved attention and space” on their website.

Chee had previously written two articles for HuffPost, titled Without Freedom There is No Free Trade and Free the Singapore Media and Let the People Go, on Nov. 13, 2014 and Dec. 11, 2014 respectively.

In his diatribe against the website, Minister Chan also called Chee a “political failure” and insinuated he is not an honourable man.

In response, HuffPost replied Minister Chan by explaining that Chee’s contribution of two articles in reality made up only 0.0001% of content they published in any given year, and therefore, the accusation that he received undeserved space is uncalled for.

This is compounded by the fact that Chee’s articles were competing for eyeballs against cat videos and other shorter articles on HuffPost showing people face-planting that were more shareable in nature.

Moreover, as an American media, HuffPost said it is not up to them to judge people based on how well they did in life thus far, but what people can do to contribute to society in the future.

HuffPost then wrote that they would allow Minister Chan himself to contribute articles to them if he is so inclined to be heard on such a platform, but that time spent writing articles for a blog-like website might not justify his ministerial salary.

HuffPost then wrote: “We wonder how much did it cost taxpayers for Minister of Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong to write this article for The Straits Times?”

http://newnation.sg/2015/01/huffpos...epresent-0-0001-of-content-we-publish-a-year/
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

http://www.straitstimes.com/news/op...p-town-council-and-the-sound-silence-20141210

Lawrence Wong
[h=1]WP town council and the sound of silence[/h]
Published on Dec 10, 2014 7:53 AM
2267 4 0 3 PRINT EMAIL



The writer is concerned over the silence from the Workers' Party, which runs the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council, whenever questions are raised over its conduct, namely, the cleaning of hawker centres, running of illegal trade fairs and the managing of service and conservancy charge arrears. -- ST PHOTO: DESMOND WEE









By Lawrence Wong

One of my responsibilities in the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth is to regulate charities.
One thing I have learnt about charities is that wanting to do good is not enough.
When you are responsible for public monies, whether donations or fees, good intentions are not enough to prevent bad outcomes.




From time to time, some charities get into trouble because of the mismanagement of funds and poor governance. The dishonest ones would choose to stay silent, hoping that it would go unnoticed. But, eventually, questions grow too loud, and the issues burst into the open, as they rightly should.
In recent weeks, the centre of attention has not been a charity, but a town council, specifically, the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC).
Every year that the Workers' Party (WP) has run AHPETC, the town council has been consistently flagged "red", both for its service and conservancy charge (S&CC) arrears management and its corporate governance.
In fact, since 2012, AHPETC has faced repeated questions - from its own auditor, from the Ministry of National Development (MND), and from residents of Aljunied, Hougang and Punggol East.
The situation worsened sharply in April last year. AHPETC reported a spike in its S&CC arrears - nearly 30 per cent of its HDB residents and 50 per cent of its commercial units owed S&CC for three months or more. This was more than 10 times the national average for HDB residents; and more than 34 times for the commercial units.
The spike came suddenly, without warning. After that, silence. No more S&CC arrears reports at all, for 18 months now.
Something is seriously wrong.
MND is naturally concerned. It has queried AHPETC several times.
But so far, all we have got from AHPETC are prevarications, non-answers, and sweeping assurances that things will be all right.
It reminds me of an erratic TV set that works initially. After a while, the image starts to flicker, and then with an almighty bang, the screen goes black. Eventually, a message appears on the screen: Please don't adjust your controls. Your TV is working fine; the picture will return shortly.
But nothing more happens.
Recently, WP chairman Sylvia Lim, the AHPETC chairman, explained that the delay in submitting the arrears figures was because of an audit by the Auditor-General's Office (AGO).
But AHPETC had stopped submitting monthly arrears reports 10 months before the AGO audit began.
Anyway, why should an audit prevent Ms Lim from immediately investigating the figures, establishing the facts, and informing the public?
Perhaps, there is a good explanation for all this.
Perhaps, the April 2013 arrears figure was just an aberration.
But maybe, just maybe, there are bigger problems lurking behind the tangled web?
AHPETC recently put out a tender for a new managing agent. Not a single company bid, not even the current managing agent. Clearly, I am not the only one queasy about goings-on in AHPETC.
In fact, the issue is not just the S&CC arrears, but the governance and supervision of the town council, and what the WP MPs are doing (or not) to resolve the matter.
Nobody knows - which is precisely the problem.
Every month, AHPETC collects $3 million in S&CC from residents and shopkeepers. This is $36 million a year.
Residents and shopkeepers deserve to know that their money is being properly managed and spent by the town council, and that everyone who is supposed to pay is, indeed, paying.
But unless AHPETC starts being transparent and accountable and answers questions, the residents may never know the truth.
When pressed recently, Ms Lim said that she was looking into the matter and would release her findings in "due time".
That was the same answer she gave two years ago, when the arrears issue was first flagged.
There is a disturbingly familiar pattern in how the WP responds whenever questions are raised about its conduct.
It has happened again and again - cleaning hawker centres, running illegal trade fairs and, now, managing S&CC arrears.
First, its leaders say it is not a big deal. Then, when they can no longer pretend it is not a big deal, they blame someone else - the National Environment Agency, the People's Action Party, even the AGO. Then, when their excuses are exposed one by one, they say "we are looking into the matter", or that things will be explained - in "due time". And then, more silence.
Perhaps, the WP hopes that by lying low and keeping its head down, the matter will go away. The public may forget, or even better, not notice.
But it will not, and the public will not. Instead, the WP's credibility and integrity are slowly but surely draining away.
After my colleague Desmond Lee, as well as many residents and commentators in the media, raised questions, I was expecting the WP to issue a prompt and full reply, and end its long and damaging silence.
Sadly, nothing of the sort has happened.
Instead, there is silence - one that is growing more deafening by the day.
The writer is the Minister for Culture, Community and Youth.


- See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/op...e-sound-silence-20141210#sthash.dmp0QWtG.dpuf
 

JohorRookie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

HuffPost then wrote that they would allow Minister Chan himself to contribute articles to them if he is so inclined to be heard on such a platform, but that time spent writing articles for a blog-like website might not justify his ministerial salary.

HuffPost suan Kee Chiu ?
 

garlic

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

Yep, suan him gao gao.. what a dig! :p

Now ah chan can write in to say how he is a "something" and his meteoric rise to be a political superstar?
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

Yep, suan him gao gao.. what a dig! :p

Now ah chan can write in to say how he is a "something" and his meteoric rise to be a political superstar?

He wil write in how much swear and blood he lost over leading the NDP!
 

iamhere

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

In reality, the nation have been providing welfare state benefits "minimum wages" in millions to each individual leech aka papee, (juz because of one party rule system) to leeches aka papees leeching on the system. These leeches aka papees wasting nation's time and resources and etc every single second of the Mother Earth's day. By some unfortunate default, we as a nation have to put food on table and tonnes of $$$ for these leeches...


The country needs the government (employees of the public) to work for the country.
Can these leeches aka papees become self reliant? Get a job and be prepared to work hard
at least for once in a lifetime. Stop Leeching on the system.




FUCK PAP, FUCK PAP, FUCK PAP.........
MAY PAPEES, CRONIES N FAMILIES BURN ETERNALLY IN HELLS.........
MAJULLAH SINGAPURA.........
GOD BLESS SINGAPORE..............
REMEMBER to

VOTE papees OUT



do yrself, yr forefathers and yr generations to come, a favor, a service and a long-awaited justice





:wink::wink::wink::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::wink::wink::wink:



iamhere says a lot about this:"The democracy shall cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those LEECHES who would not.”
 

Satyr

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

HuffPost is echoing what Singaporeans think anyway. That these guys are really wasting our money. Think about his hourly rate and think about how much time must have gone into composing and editing and high-fiving each other. What brilliant insights has CCS brought to us anyway since he parachuted down ? Oh yes, the Lanfang Republic. Whether you agree with CSJ or not, he has stated his vision for SG in words and writing, alot of which has been coopted by the MIW.
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

HuffPost is echoing what Singaporeans think anyway. That these guys are really wasting our money. Think about his hourly rate and think about how much time must have gone into composing and editing and high-fiving each other. What brilliant insights has CCS brought to us anyway since he parachuted down ? Oh yes, the Lanfang Republic. Whether you agree with CSJ or not, he has stated his vision for SG in words and writing, alot of which has been coopted by the MIW.

either PAP/Kee Chiu sue them for their "remarks" or they keep quiet. What next?
 

McDonaldsKid

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

Isn't that article from New Nation satire? I don't think Huffington Post even bothered to reply to a zzzzz letter.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

This Belmonte guy quite a two headed snake huh.
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

... In response, HuffPost replied Minister Chan by explaining that Chee’s contribution of two articles in reality made up only 0.0001% of content they published in any given year, and therefore, the accusation that he received undeserved space is uncalled for ...
dat burger is s2pig ... how many sinkies even heard of huffington? ... by writing 2 huffington, he's directing peasants attention 2 articles which he accused of as undeserving of space ... n his action has juz shown dat ze 2 articles deserf their place in huffington ...
 

bakkuttay

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

hantam waste taxpayers money refer to another snake lawrence wong
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: HuffPost response: Not-a-failure CCS wasting taxpayers' money

CCS certainly got more than he bargained for! He thought he was being clever and loyal but ended up being ridiculed. Paid so much to do so little including in this case writing to Huffington to score little brownie points against Dr Chee. If he is so self-righteous about morality and doing the best for Singapore then he should issue a challenge to Dr Chee for a face-off televised debate. Got balls or not? Any Tom Dick Harry or kuniang can also write letters to the press except that in his case, he carries a high-sounding title as Minister for Culture Communuty and Youth with a very high salary to boot.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The hard truth is this:

Many of you despise COA Chan Chun Sing because he is a scholar who doesn't understand the average joe's daily struggles, and that he was a walkover MP, and that he practically got a good life handed to him on a silver platter. Many of you admire Chee because he was bankrupted and humiliated nationally by PAP, and you have the natural instinct to want to support the underdog.

But at the end of the day, if Chee was to stand in an SMC vs Chan, Chan would almost certainly win. And win big.

The truth is that while most sinkies curse the PAP daily, these same sinkies fear a future without the PAP. They all want opposition MP to check PAP, but they don't want the opposition MP in their ward, lest they lose out on upgrading and other municipal improvements.
 
Top