• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Kangaroo Court - Unfair Cases (Pls Contribute and Make Known)

angbin

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Let me start

1. Woffles Wu lied to police with accomplice Kuan Kit Wah. WW fined $1000, Kuan scoot free. Compare this with Evangeline Tan's case she got fined $2k and two accomplices jailed 3 & 6 months.

Please list more for all sinkies to see and put pressure to the government these cronyism in this country has to stop.
 

chonburifc

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Breedtok chairman Gorge Quek was fined the maximum of $6,000 yesterday for drunk, but escaped the customary jail sentence for the crime.

Magistrate Sibei Lwee Bin ruled out a jail sentence for Quek, 48, because of the mitigating circumstances of the case, a decision that was met with whoops of joy from his family members in the courtroom yesterday.

Since Chief Justice Yong Pung How declared in 1992 that jail sentences should be handed out to all no money drunk-driving offenders, very few people convicted of the crime have escaped being put behind bars.

But yesterday, Magistrate Sibei Lwee Bin said that while prison terms have been customary for such offences, sentencing precedents were only guidelines.

The magistrate noted that Quek had demonstrated genuine remorse and had tried to compensate the traffic ninjas the very next day.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
irene-shinmin.jpg


Channel NewsAsia - Thursday, January 21

59—year—old doctor to pay fine for drink—driving

SINGAPORE: A doctor who appealed against her jail term for drink—driving had her sentence reduced to a fine on Wednesday.

Instead of serving the jail sentence, Dr Irene Lim Kay Hian, a 59—year—old senior consultant radiologist at the KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, will now just have to pay a fine of S$5,000.

In October, she was found guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol between 9pm on April 26 and 1.30am the following morning.

After her car stalled along the Pan Island Expressway near the Clementi Avenue 6 exit, a patrol officer checked on the car and noticed that she reeked of alcohol.

A breathalyser test later showed that she had 129 mcg of alcohol per 100 ml of breath, nearly four times the legal limit of 35 mcg.

On Tuesday, Dr Lim’s lawyer, Senior Counsel Sant Singh, argued that her decision to drive was not deliberate but she was upset because she had received word that a relative was ill.

After announcing his decision, Justice Chao Hick Tin said he will release his written decisions soon.
 

chonburifc

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This one lagi cheap sgd 2.4k nia. No wonder lexus selling so well.

WOMAN DRIVER CRASHED INTO CYCLIST BUT THOUGHT HE WAS TREE BRANCH
29 Sep 2010
SOURCE: The New Paper

HER car rammed into a cyclist from the rear so hard that he flew and hit the front windscreen, cracking part of it, before rolling onto the road.

But Cleopatra Wong Yuin Ping, 30, thought the body that smashed into the windscreen was a rotten tree branch that had fallen.

She did not bother to stop and continued driving her car along Holland Road.

Wong was also unaware that her victim’s bicycle was stuck in the undercarriage of the Lexus ES300 belonging to her father, despite the noise of the bicycle scraping against the road.

The bicycle was dragged for about 2km before it was dislodged.

When Wong, who was a teacher then, reached home, she went to bed.

She realised something was wrong only when she woke up in the morning and found out that the police had towed away the five-year-old Lexus.

Taken to court over the accident, Wong claimed that the soundproofing of the Lexus was so good that she thought the “sounds” she heard were caused by the tree branch.

Last month, she was fined a total of $2,400 – $800 on each of three charges – and disqualified from driving for a year.

She had pleaded guilty to inconsiderate driving, failing to stop after an accident and failing to render assistance after an accident.

The court heard that Wong was driving home along Holland Road at about 5.15am on Oct 19, 2008, when she hit the rear of a bicycle ridden by MrMuhammad Asri Aris.

At 60kmh

She was travelling at 60kmh and had just passed the speed camera at the junction of Holland Road and Minden Road.

The impact caused Mr Muhammad Asri, 19, to be flung onto the front windscreen of the car before landing on the left side of the road.
The impact of the crash caused the windscreen to be cracked on the left side.

Wong continued driving, dragging the bicycle stuck on the undercarriage of the car until the junction of Holland Road and Leedon Road, where it was finally dislodged.

Mr Muhammad Asri was warded in the Singapore General Hospital for two days with a fractured left shoulder, a cut on his forehead and multiple abrasions.

He was given medical leave for about a month.

The court heard that Wong had gone to popular nightspot Zouk to look for her cousin who had not returned home.

The cousin was staying with Wong’s family at Ming Teck Park, off Sixth Avenue, because her parents were in China.

Wong’s lawyer, Mr P O Ram, said in her mitigation that she could not find her cousin and decided to return home.

After the Minden Road junction, there was a canopy of trees along the road.

Suddenly, Wong heard a bang on the left side of her windscreen and looked in that direction.

The glass was cracked and she assumed a rotten tree branch had fallen on the windsreen.

Mr Ram said the car was a 3000cc Lexus with a good soundproofing system.

Dents

When Wong heard some sounds at the rear of the car, she thought that it was caused by the branch.

When she reached home, she noticed a few dents and scratches on the left of the front bumper.

Mr Ram said that Wong felt that there was no urgency to report the incident as it involved only a branch.

She went to bed with the intention of making a report and informing the insurance company later in the morning.

After the police towed the car away before 8am the same day, Wong’s brother called them at about 9am. He was told by an officer to ask the driver to contact him.

Wong called the officer immediately.

Mr Ram told the court that Wong regretted not stopping and checking the car when she heard the bang. She has not driven since the accident.

Wong resigned from teaching after giving birth to her first child in December last year.

She intends to return to teaching next year, the court was told.

Noting that the incident happened in the early hours of the morning, District Judge Salina Ishak said that it was possible that the shadows cast from the canopy of trees would have had an impact on her line of sight, resulting in her mistaken assumption about the “object” that had struck her windscreen.

The judge said: “I was of the view that the present case was not one involving a high level of culpability evidenced by a wilful or reckless disregard of the rules of the road and an apparent disregard for the great danger caused to others.”

She added that from the facts, it appeared that there was no deliberate attempt on Wong’s part not to stop in order to evade arrest.

“(Wong) had also immediately called the police once she was informed by the brother.”

The prosecution is appealing against Wong’s sentence for the charge of failing to render assistance after an accident. It carries a maximum fine of $3,000 or a jail term of a year.
 

chonburifc

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
knn pedestrians and other road users see Lexus coming better siam.

Wonder what will be the sentence if the driver is a chow beng driving a civic with type r and mugen decals.

Don't know can tell judge exhaust sound too loud, cannot hear outside.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wonder what will be the sentence if the driver is a chow beng driving a civic with type r and mugen decals.

Don't know can tell judge exhaust sound too loud, cannot hear outside.

Got la I think got rich beng got away before also.
Let me dig out to educate the 60.1%....today very free
 

rambo22

Alfrescian
Loyal
Breedtok chairman Gorge Quek was fined the maximum of $6,000 yesterday for drunk, but escaped the customary jail sentence for the crime.

Magistrate Sibei Lwee Bin ruled out a jail sentence for Quek, 48, because of the mitigating circumstances of the case, a decision that was met with whoops of joy from his family members in the courtroom yesterday.

Since Chief Justice Yong Pung How declared in 1992 that jail sentences should be handed out to all no money drunk-driving offenders, very few people convicted of the crime have escaped being put behind bars.

But yesterday, Magistrate Sibei Lwee Bin said that while prison terms have been customary for such offences, sentencing precedents were only guidelines.



The magistrate noted that Quek had demonstrated genuine remorse and had tried to compensate the traffic ninjas the very next day.



His bread can talk ma.

That's why.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Cleopetra Wong case is a truly landmark case where a series of clear factors showing culpability was explained away by ridiculous and silly reasons and the magistrate "chose" to swallow it hook, line and sinker. I was disappointed that AG did not appeal. She went to Zouk not party but to look for a her relative - one of many lies.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Give the "elite" a break. What's the point of being rich and powerful if you end up being treated like a commoner???

Surely there have to some privileges attached to wealth and status and leniency by the courts is part of the package.
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
There is a trend emerging.
If rich, famous, elite and well connected then fine only.

Bro, it has always been the case, just that they were not reported.
Difference is, nowadays they throw it right into your face. Damn "SIA LAN"! Machiam like telling you people, So? What can you doing? KNNBCCB!:biggrin:
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Give the "elite" a break. What's the point of being rich and powerful if you end up being treated like a commoner???

Surely there have to some privileges attached to wealth and status and leniency by the courts is part of the package.

These are not the "Privileges" they are entitled. They can have all the privileges in a legal manner, but when it comes to breaking of laws, everyone should be treated equally. :oIo:
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Why should that be the case? Please explain.

Do you want SG to become another PRC?
The privileges for the wealthy and well connected should be limited to society status and business dealings respectively. I agree that these people are entitled to privileges too.
They can afford a holiday with the actresses and models using their wealth while others can't but that doesn't mean they can go around raping women and going scot free.
They can use their connections to get business contracts while others can't but that doesn't mean they can compromise on the terms and conditions stated within the contracts.
 

chonburifc

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Anyone still remember what happen was the senteence given to the Japanese FT who ran down the comedian in the mid 90s?
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I remember back when Yong Pung How (Yong Pung Sai) was the CJ, almost all appeals were rejected and the original sentencing was made much more severe.
That Hakka twat was sadistic.

He's three years younger than Old Fart Lee, so it won't be long before he kicks the bucket.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
They can use their connections to get business contracts while others can't but that doesn't mean they can compromise on the terms and conditions stated within the contracts.

Everyone tries to use connections. When I was working in Singapore, we had a supervisor whose brother was working in Maxwell Road traffic police division.

Anyone who was caught speeding would immediately contact this guy and ask him to call up his brother to "help". It always worked.

This was in the days before computerisation and hanky panky was easy. The paperwork was simply misplaced.

So taking advantage of connections is human nature. Everyone does it regardless of their status in society. We only resent it when we find someone else getting away with things which we can't get away with.
 

chonburifc

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Everyone tries to use connections. When I was working in Singapore, we had a supervisor whose brother was working in Maxwell Road traffic police division.

Anyone who was caught speeding would immediately contact this guy and ask him to call up his brother to "help". It always worked.

This was in the days before computerisation and hanky panky was easy. The paperwork was simply misplaced.

So taking advantage of connections is human nature. Everyone does it regardless of their status in society. We only resent it when we find someone else getting away with things which we can't get away with.

What about the taxi driver who killed your best friend? Did he used any connection to get away? Did you use any connection to nail the taxi driver?
 
Top