• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

JBJ: Go to Low Thia Kiang if you are happy with the status quo

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal
Contrary to the popular misperception which is reinforced by the state media, the Workers’ Party of today was not ‘built’ by Low Thia Kiang, but by the late opposition leader Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam, or JBJ, as he is fondly remembered.

The Workers’ Party was founded by Singapore’s first Chief Minister David Marshall in 1957, but it ceased to become a political force to be reckoned with after Marshall left politics in 1963 and remained in the doldrums till JBJ ‘revived’ it in the 1970s.

It earned its reputation as a fearless opposition which dared to speak up for Singaporeans and check on the PAP in parliament after JBJ won the Anson seat in 1981 and again in 1984, thereby denting the PAP’s absolute majority in parliament.

In 1988, the Workers’ Party under the astute leadership of JBJ came closest to anybody else to winning a GRC when the trio of Francis Seow, Lee Siew Choh and Mohammed Khalid Baboo won 49.7 percent of the valid votes in Eunos GRC.

JBJ spent more than twenty years of his political career with the Workers’ Party. Why then did he choose to leave the party he built up so painstakingly and form the Reform Party in 2008? It is never easy to found a new party, especially with the meager resources JBJ had, after just managing to discharge himself from bankruptcy.

The reason is only one: the present Workers’ Party under Low Thia Kiang no longer shares JBJ’s lifelong vision of reforming the archaic political system of Singapore which is designed specifically to retain and perpetuate the PAP’s political hegemony forever.

In his speech on the launch of the Reform Party, JBJ told Singaporeans in no uncertain terms to “go to Low Thia Kiang” if they are “happy with the status quo.”

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AvqE_xAN1is&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AvqE_xAN1is&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>

What is the “status quo”? The present status quo has nothing to do with the number of PAP or opposition MPs in parliament. It is about the entire political system of Singapore with all its state institutions under the tight-fisted control of the PAP and a rubber-stamped parliament which passes bills and legislation with little or no accountability to anybody else.

We have seen over the last four years how the PAP is able to govern with impunity with scant regards for public sentiments. Many misguided policies are forced down the throats of Singaporeans and its ministers do not have to take any responsibility for disastrous screw-ups such as the rampant floods, astronomical HDB flat prices and YOG fiasco.

What did the two WP MPs do or say? Did you hear them commenting on the sky-rocketing HDB prices, criticizing Dr Vivian for the YOG or taking the Prime Minister to task for his liberal immigration policies? Nothing at all! It is as if their mouths are stuffed with ‘gold’ that they cannot open. This is the type of opposition which the PAP loves so much – compliant, non-confrontational and most importantly SILENT.

JBJ knew that the present WP under Low Thia Kiang and Sylvia Lim will never be able to fulfill his dream of reforming Singapore. That’s why he chose to take the longer and more arduous route of starting a new party from scratch. In fact Low Thia Kiang once proclaimed rather proudly that WP will not be able to challenge the PAP for the next fifty years.

A vote for WP is a vote for the status quo, meaning that nothing will ever change. The PAP will again be given a ‘blank cheque’ to rule with WP MPs putting up a ‘wayang’ in parliament to masquerade Singapore as a ‘democracy’ to the world. So what’s the point of having 10, 20 or even 30 WP MPs in parliament when they dare not confront the PAP and is happy with the status quo?

Before he passed away, JBJ left us a legacy, whose mantle is now taken over by his elder son Kenneth Jeyaretnam, the Secretary-General of the Reform Party.

Many of the Reform Party’s 19 policy proposals in its election manifesto for Singapore are JBJ’s ideas which can be found in his books.

Are you happy with the system in Singapore at the moment? If you are not, then please listen to JBJ and lend your support to parties which dare reform the system like the Reform Party. Otherwise, you can continue to watch the ‘wayang kulit’ put up by the ‘wayang party’ and the PAP in parliament.

Please vote wisely in the next election. Reject any parties which seek to maintain the status quo and cast your sacred vote only to those which aim to reform Singapore.

.

Serene Wong

.

Editor’s note: The views expressed in this article are of the writer’s own and not indicative of the stand of TR.


http://www.temasekreview.com/2010/1...a-kiang-if-you-are-happy-with-the-status-quo/
 

Robert Half

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ask the Singapore voters - do they want a reform ?

They will tell you they want PAP to be their MP of their wards and serve them :smile:
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sorry, even if I agree with JBJ about WP, I don't agree that RP is the solution. Not the son who ran the party in such a different direction as the father, kicked out the person his father installed as chairman (NTS), saying he will avoid lawsuits, talked about suing people, which indirectly criticized the father perhaps without realizing it.

If I vote against WP just because LTK took it to a changed direction as JBJ, then I don't see why I should vote for RP since KJ took it to a changed direction as well.

But I'll be voting for either one, so Scroo doesn't have to worry.
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
so who is the fucking mole here? Those who agree with the ass screwing PAP system.
 

Char_Azn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In my opinion, only WP Low is capable of doing that :smile:

I think Low is doing a decent job. For all of CSJ's angry rhetoric and stupid antics, 1 statement from Low in Parliament beats anything CSJ does all year. The problem with some of these opposition party members is that they do not seem to understand the local voters mindset. Chiam and Low may not be very vocal in parliament but I think they've done way more for the opposition cause then all the opposition party members put together.

Unlike CSJ, they do not rant and rave for no reason. They plan carefully before questioning a policy, they seem to know how to make full use of their position and bring up questionable issues. Most of which are reported in the mainstream media. Some of the most embarrassing moments that PAP have suffer was to reply their queries making them look dumber then they would like. These are things that most SGreans read about. The average joe isn't going to read about stupid rants on the internet. Most neutrals are not dumb enough to believe in stupid bullshit that TR pulls out of their asses. The pple who believe in those stupid bullshit are the same pple who will vote for the opposition no matter what. So what is the point of trying to win them over anyway

The best way to win the election is to get the neutral votes. SGreans in general are not confrontational and do not like confrontation style of politics as can be seen from the backlash of the "James Gomez incident" when many found the unrelenting attacks from the PAP on a minor mistake by James Gomez to be off putting. Same goes for when SDP suffered when the joker CSJ pull his loudhailer stunt

It's obvious that the majority of SG voters are not looking for a joker who makes noise for the sake of doing so. They are looking for pple who in their eyes are creditable. Who brings up well-informed questions and not oppose for the sake of opposing. In this regard, Chiam and Low have been doing well. Gain a reputation among the neutrals, start winning this group of voters that's the way to go. History have proven that JBJ and CSJ's style of confrontational politics does not win more votes in SG.
 

Robert Half

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think Low is doing a decent job. For all of CSJ's angry rhetoric and stupid antics, 1 statement from Low in Parliament beats anything CSJ does all year. The problem with some of these opposition party members is that they do not seem to understand the local voters mindset. Chiam and Low may not be very vocal in parliament but I think they've done way more for the opposition cause then all the opposition party members put together.

Unlike CSJ, they do not rant and rave for no reason. They plan carefully before questioning a policy, they seem to know how to make full use of their position and bring up questionable issues. Most of which are reported in the mainstream media. Some of the most embarrassing moments that PAP have suffer was to reply their queries making them look dumber then they would like. These are things that most SGreans read about. The average joe isn't going to read about stupid rants on the internet. Most neutrals are not dumb enough to believe in stupid bullshit that TR pulls out of their asses. The pple who believe in those stupid bullshit are the same pple who will vote for the opposition no matter what. So what is the point of trying to win them over anyway

The best way to win the election is to get the neutral votes. SGreans in general are not confrontational and do not like confrontation style of politics as can be seen from the backlash of the "James Gomez incident" when many found the unrelenting attacks from the PAP on a minor mistake by James Gomez to be off putting. Same goes for when SDP suffered when the joker CSJ pull his loudhailer stunt

It's obvious that the majority of SG voters are not looking for a joker who makes noise for the sake of doing so. They are looking for pple who in their eyes are creditable. Who brings up well-informed questions and not oppose for the sake of opposing. In this regard, Chiam and Low have been doing well. Gain a reputation among the neutrals, start winning this group of voters that's the way to go. History have proven that JBJ and CSJ's style of confrontational politics does not win more votes in SG.


I agree on your above analysis. Low speak & questioned well in the Parliament. WP public image raise into a credible opposition and the challenge is still try to win a GRC before talking about reforming the system here. No point talking democracy if opposition parties cannot understand the mindset of local voters :biggrin:
 

ivebert

Alfrescian
Loyal
Unlike CSJ, they do not rant and rave for no reason. They plan carefully before questioning a policy, they seem to know how to make full use of their position and bring up questionable issues.

Are you sure??????????????????????



<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wwGF8MV4nSo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wwGF8MV4nSo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sorry, even if I agree with JBJ about WP, I don't agree that RP is the solution. Not the son who ran the party in such a different direction as the father, kicked out the person his father installed as chairman (NTS), saying he will avoid lawsuits, talked about suing people, which indirectly criticized the father perhaps without realizing it.

If I vote against WP just because LTK took it to a changed direction as JBJ, then I don't see why I should vote for RP since KJ took it to a changed direction as well.

http://johnharding.com/2010/12/20/kenneth-jeyaretnam-balraj-naidu-singapores-reform-party/

Singapore terrorist Balraj Naidu was sentenced to prison in USA and is serving time in prison. The link may shed light on the relationship between the Jeyaretnams and Balraj (aka Baldev) Naidu, and why he wanted to change his name.
 

cleareyes

Alfrescian
Loyal
Contrary to the popular misperception which is reinforced by the state media, the Workers’ Party of today was not ‘built’ by Low Thia Kiang, but by the late opposition leader Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam, or JBJ, as he is fondly remembered.

The Workers’ Party was founded by Singapore’s first Chief Minister David Marshall in 1957, but it ceased to become a political force to be reckoned with after Marshall left politics in 1963 and remained in the doldrums till JBJ ‘revived’ it in the 1970s.

It earned its reputation as a fearless opposition which dared to speak up for Singaporeans and check on the PAP in parliament after JBJ won the Anson seat in 1981 and again in 1984, thereby denting the PAP’s absolute majority in parliament.

In 1988, the Workers’ Party under the astute leadership of JBJ came closest to anybody else to winning a GRC when the trio of Francis Seow, Lee Siew Choh and Mohammed Khalid Baboo won 49.7 percent of the valid votes in Eunos GRC.

JBJ spent more than twenty years of his political career with the Workers’ Party. Why then did he choose to leave the party he built up so painstakingly and form the Reform Party in 2008? It is never easy to found a new party, especially with the meager resources JBJ had, after just managing to discharge himself from bankruptcy.

The reason is only one: the present Workers’ Party under Low Thia Kiang no longer shares JBJ’s lifelong vision of reforming the archaic political system of Singapore which is designed specifically to retain and perpetuate the PAP’s political hegemony forever.

In his speech on the launch of the Reform Party, JBJ told Singaporeans in no uncertain terms to “go to Low Thia Kiang” if they are “happy with the status quo.”

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AvqE_xAN1is&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AvqE_xAN1is&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>

What is the “status quo”? The present status quo has nothing to do with the number of PAP or opposition MPs in parliament. It is about the entire political system of Singapore with all its state institutions under the tight-fisted control of the PAP and a rubber-stamped parliament which passes bills and legislation with little or no accountability to anybody else.

We have seen over the last four years how the PAP is able to govern with impunity with scant regards for public sentiments. Many misguided policies are forced down the throats of Singaporeans and its ministers do not have to take any responsibility for disastrous screw-ups such as the rampant floods, astronomical HDB flat prices and YOG fiasco.

What did the two WP MPs do or say? Did you hear them commenting on the sky-rocketing HDB prices, criticizing Dr Vivian for the YOG or taking the Prime Minister to task for his liberal immigration policies? Nothing at all! It is as if their mouths are stuffed with ‘gold’ that they cannot open. This is the type of opposition which the PAP loves so much – compliant, non-confrontational and most importantly SILENT.

JBJ knew that the present WP under Low Thia Kiang and Sylvia Lim will never be able to fulfill his dream of reforming Singapore. That’s why he chose to take the longer and more arduous route of starting a new party from scratch. In fact Low Thia Kiang once proclaimed rather proudly that WP will not be able to challenge the PAP for the next fifty years.

A vote for WP is a vote for the status quo, meaning that nothing will ever change. The PAP will again be given a ‘blank cheque’ to rule with WP MPs putting up a ‘wayang’ in parliament to masquerade Singapore as a ‘democracy’ to the world. So what’s the point of having 10, 20 or even 30 WP MPs in parliament when they dare not confront the PAP and is happy with the status quo?

Before he passed away, JBJ left us a legacy, whose mantle is now taken over by his elder son Kenneth Jeyaretnam, the Secretary-General of the Reform Party.

Many of the Reform Party’s 19 policy proposals in its election manifesto for Singapore are JBJ’s ideas which can be found in his books.

Are you happy with the system in Singapore at the moment? If you are not, then please listen to JBJ and lend your support to parties which dare reform the system like the Reform Party. Otherwise, you can continue to watch the ‘wayang kulit’ put up by the ‘wayang party’ and the PAP in parliament.

Please vote wisely in the next election. Reject any parties which seek to maintain the status quo and cast your sacred vote only to those which aim to reform Singapore.

.

Serene Wong

.

Editor’s note: The views expressed in this article are of the writer’s own and not indicative of the stand of TR.


http://www.temasekreview.com/2010/1...a-kiang-if-you-are-happy-with-the-status-quo/

Instead of spending time convincing voters, TR, with SDP's blessing, had restart the attack on WP again by draging up the past.

I can see why the public would not bother to support SDP when it keep on heaping on the past and ignoring the present and perhaps the future.
 

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal
Instead of spending time convincing voters, TR, with SDP's blessing, had restart the attack on WP again by draging up the past.

I can see why the public would not bother to support SDP when it keep on heaping on the past and ignoring the present and perhaps the future.

Perhaps you can quote some examples of how SDP is heaping on the past and ignoring the present. To date I have not seen any mentioned.
 

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal

Are you sure??????????????????????



<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wwGF8MV4nSo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wwGF8MV4nSo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Ah Beng's champion LTK dare not look up at Lee Jr when the latter eyeballed him on the question of WKS resignation. Talk about balls.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
For years I have always wondered what is the fuss about the video and what it has to do with how Low or even Lee and the PAP behave in Parliament. I'm still wondering today.

The issue with Parliament has always been about the proportion of seats. Because that translates into votes to pass a bill. Whichever minister or MP it is, who cares what they talk and how they react? In the end, what counts is the Parliamentary voting and every time it turns up 70, 80 plus versus 2 or 3. I can get 30 more lousy opposition performers yet ensure PAP can never successfully pass a single lousy bill. Which is more important - lousy opposition or lousy bills?

The weakness of the WP is not how Low "cowed" or being "weak" in Parliament but whether WP thinks that Parliament is an end in itself. In terms of profiling, Parliament is a trap. You can't say much, you are gagged here and there, and you look worse in the papers because one seat in Parliament gets diluted by 80-over voices in the media. Who knows it's better opposition stay away from Parliament so they can perform via press releases, which get better coverage.

If people be it GMS or anyone wants to do it differently in Parliament, wait till they get hauled out by the Adjutant of Parliament in every sitting if they think this is a good spectacle. I can tell you that the result is votes averaging no more than 25% for their party for a long time, like the SDP now.
 
Top