• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is The STI (Straits Times Index) Rigged??

ScarFace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Business Times - 22 Apr 2009

STOCKS
Was Jardine Matheson used to rig the STI?

By R SIVANITHY
SENIOR CORRESPONDENT

GENUINE buying or index manipulation? This is the question traders were asking after the Straits Times Index yesterday jumped more than 30 points in the final few seconds, reversing a loss of 21 points at 5pm to a nett gain of 12.4 points at 1,887.25.

The thinly-traded Jardine Matheson (JM) was identified as the main counter used to push the STI up - the counter sold for US$19.96 at 5pm but ended a nett US$4.16 or 21 per cent higher at US$24 after the post-closing adjustment period at 5.05pm. Only 36 lots were bought in these five minutes, yet JM's rise alone pushed the STI up by 19 points.

Notwithstanding JM's odd movement, judging by the pattern of yesterday's session, traders were clearly betting that Wall Street would stabilise after its 4 per cent selloff on Monday - the Straits Times Index, which has proved to be an excellent front-runner of the US market's performance, first dropped 60 points but had recovered two-thirds of this before the push on JM.

However, the broad market - excluding derivatives and the STI's 13-12 advance-decline score - was weak with just 91 rises and 273 falls.

Analysts appear divided over the outlook for the STI. Citi Investment Research, which until a couple of weeks ago had said that the index would drop to 1,500, in a April 17 Strategy Focus said that its 12-month target is now 2,400 because, based on the latest economic data, the worst is over.

'Market valuations should normalise and recover closer to mean price/book valuations once the economy is out of the recession. Our 2,400 target represents a conservative price/book of 1.47 times, still 0.5 standard deviations below our adjusted 12-month trailing price/book mean of 1.63 times,' said Citi.

It added that the index might pull back to 1,700 but the likelihood of testing the recent low of 1,460 is low, so it would buy the dips.

BCA Research however, said in its April 17 Emerging Markets Strategy that a moderation in the pace of contraction, which is what has been taking place, does not mean imminent recovery and since the risk/reward ratio of global equities is poor, it would not recommend chasing the rally in emerging markets.

'There has been considerable enthusiasm about 'green shoots' in the global economy. While any sign of tentative improvement is worth watching for, we continue to advise caution . . . our view is that the US economy's secular growth at the current juncture is not as rosy as before and the features of the current downtrend are different from all previous recessions in the past 60 years,' said BCA, adding that the main difference was that the banking system was functioning properly in previous recessions.

'Bankruptcies, downsizing and debt restructuring are likely to continue dominating the economic and financial landscape. For us, this means the current US equity rally's staying power is questionable,' said BCA.

Phillip Securities Research earlier this month, in its Q2 outlook, said that although Wall Street was at that time reacting to signs of economic stability, a likely scenario is a selloff once growth disappoints.

It also said that we are experiencing 30 years of global imbalances unwinding and expects the local economy's recovery to be 'L' and possibly 'W' shaped. It expects Q3 growth to be positive but the rebound to be unsustainable, with Q4 growth falling once again into negative territory.
 

Soul_Reaper

Alfrescian
Loyal
All stock indexes are manipulated..... especially active or "bad" depending on which way you look at it are the Hang Seng & Nikkei index :(
 

angie II

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
2h2pcg2.jpg


"Rigging is good, if not then i worry"
 

ahleebabasingaporethief

Alfrescian
Loyal
Its a very small market the STI. A mere drop in the Ocean. Pai bo mia one ok.

Very easy to cho kar chew.

But the problem is from my talks with many financial people, the ANG MOs are the biggest culprits in "cho kar chew" here. But they are never brought to justice.

But if a local house cho, mo tin tin fa tat. Sure kenna one. So we all wait to see JM shares done by who ah?

Just buying up 36 lots of JM shares can move the STI 32 points up. You all see so easy to move our STI index. What if they buy DBS and others. Fly to the moon also can. Very small market lah our stock market here.

So "invest" in stocks at your own risks.

Only 2 types of people play the markets today because there is no fundamentals to play.

1) GAMBLERS

2) DESPERATE PEOPLE TRYING TO RECOUP LOSSES
 
Last edited:

JohnTT

Alfrescian
Loyal
Its a very small market the STI. A mere drop in the Ocean. Pai bo mia one ok.

Very easy to cho kar chew.

But the problem is from my talks with many financial people, the ANG MOs are the biggest culprits in "cho kar chew" here. But they are never brought to justice.

But if a local house cho, mo tin tin fa tat. Sure kenna one. So we all wait to see JM shares done by who ah?


You're right. That is the same understanding I got from other people in the financial industry. SGX dare not take action against them 'cos it worry these funds may pull out & result in less trading activities over here. However if you are local & belong to a small syndicate, then prepare yourself to be beheaded, with your severed head hanging in the public.
 

ScarFace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Business Times - 23 Apr 2009

Top Stories for Front Page
Jardine Matheson pulls back

Correction from Tuesday's spurt and intensive selling in HK result in STI losing 44 points

By R SIVANITHY
SENIOR CORRESPONDENT

THERE were no surprises in trading yesterday - Jardine Matheson (JM) shares, which were artificially pushed up in late trading on Tuesday, fell back by almost exactly the same amount. The Straits Times Index (STI) thus suffered a loss, though this was also a function of selling in Hong Kong, and penny stocks were still in play, but in sharply lower liquidity, and punters ran for cover amid weakening sentiment.

Also not surprising was the STI's failure to respond positively to Wall Street's Tuesday bounce - by now, traders would know that programme trades buy or sell stocks in this part of the world ahead of doing the same in the US, so Wall Street's Tuesday rally was already factored in when the STI rose on Tuesday.

Although other stocks were also involved in propping the STI up on Tuesday - the banks for instance - JM's odd, eleventh-hour 21 per cent spurt that day had led to many raised eyebrows and claims of manipulation since it pushed the STI from negative to positive territory when the broad market was weak.

As a result, yesterday's US$4.10 plunge to US$19.90 in JM was seen as a readjustment to the counter's proper, pre-rigging level. However, it did cut 19 points off the STI, the index ending the day with a 43.84-point loss at 1,843.41 as selling in Hong Kong intensified as the day wore on. The inevitable conclusion was that Wall Street would not have a firm Wednesday.

Turnover, excluding foreign currency issues, was 1.7 billion units worth $1.36 billion, or about 80 cents per unit, indicating the market's continuing fascination with penny stocks.

The property sector has rarely been out of focus, at least not for long. BNP Paribas on Tuesday issued a 'neutral' call on property after news emerged of a default under the deferred payment scheme (DPS) connected to MCL's The Fernhill, while Morgan Stanley (MS) downgraded the sector because the run up in stocks has come despite deteriorating macro conditions.

BNP said that default risk should not be underestimated and that it will be high for projects whose valuations have fallen more than 20 per cent and have both high DPS content and foreign/bulk purchases.

'We believe the risk-reward profile of property stocks has turned negative given the recent run up . . . so we encourage investors to take some profit on stocks with minimal upside to our target prices,' said BNP.

It said that of the stocks it covers, CapitaLand has the most downside risk to its target price. The counter fell nine cents to $2.70.

MS, in the meantime, said yesterday that the relative outperformance of property stocks since March despite worsening economics has made it fundamentally difficult to justify being invested in the sector. 'We believe property stocks could trade downwards on realisation of revaluation losses from investment properties and writedowns of residential landbanks, with the pressure expected to be particularly evident in H2 2009,' said MS.

Earlier this month in a April 9 report, UBS Investment Research said that it thinks the local economy may have turned a corner in Q1 2009 and set an end-2009 target of 2,100 for STI. It also said that banks and property usually outperform six months from the GDP trough while telecom underperforms, but recommended that if the STI was to cross 2,000 within the next 1-3 months, investors should take profit.

'Over a 13-week rate of change, the STI rarely bounces over 40 per cent without a meaningful correction,' said UBSIR.
 

ScarFace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Business Times - 23 Apr 2009


Probe STI manipulation and disclose findings promptly

By R SIVANITHY

THE Singapore Exchange (SGX) recently hinted that it was looking at any impropriety surrounding the announcement of various rights issues. It also reprimanded Neptune Orient Lines for a disclosure lapse, simultaneously reminding all companies that full and timely disclosure 'is crucial to the operation of a fair, orderly and transparent market'.

Clearly, the exchange has decided to crack down on governance transgressions and, from the viewpoint of those who believe it has been too lenient in the past, long may this continue.

However, one area which some might argue is a governance grey area or blind spot deserves closer attention because of the extreme potential for the creation of a false market.

We're referring here to periodic rigging or manipulation of the Straits Times Index, sometimes euphemistically called 'window-dressing'.

The most recent example occurred on Tuesday, when Jardine Matheson's shares were jacked up by US$4.16 or 21 per cent to US$24 in the post-closing five-minute adjustment period, a move which added 19 points to the STI and pushed it 12 points into positive territory.

False impression

Given that the index is meant to depict at a glance the performance of the market as a whole and that the entire market was clearly weak with 104 rises against 285 falls that day, it can be argued that the JM push resulted in the creation of a false impression that the Singapore market was firm when it was not.

By extension, if a false impression equates with a false market, it is then logical to expect some sort of official investigation. Is there a case for this? The answer is yes.

First, if the buying was genuine, JM would have stayed at Tuesday's closing price yesterday. It did not - in fact, it opened US$4 lower and stayed there for the rest of the day, eventually closing US$4.10 weaker at US$19.90.

Second, there was no question of this having been an error - for one, JM is thinly traded and is typically not a retail stock so it is not likely to have been an inadvertent mistake by a naive retail investor. Moreover, hurried buying of just 36 lots during the final few minutes of one day and immediate selling the next day strongly suggests premeditation and an intention to achieve certain, presently unknown objectives. What might these be?

One possibility is to make a profit via a structured product, either exchange-traded or over-the-counter. Readers might recall that in March 2008, two dealers were found guilty of manipulating the STI in order to make money in index warrants and were fined $100,000 each. Interestingly, one of the stocks they used to rig the STI was JM, so the counter has been used before in a case involving index rigging.

Readers would also know that this is not the first time that a massive jump in one stock has caused a large index movement.

On Dec 29 last year, unknown parties ramped up CapitaMall Trust (CMT) by a staggering 87 per cent in the last few seconds, in the process jacking the index up 22 points (it closed a total of 55 points higher at 1,780). Like JM this week, CMT surrendered all of this gain the very next day.

That artificial propping up of the STI was brushed off as being year-end window-dressing, but why should this exclude it from official scrutiny?

There is no difference between the push on CMT four months ago and JM this week - both clearly created a false impression and should therefore be probed. The problem, however, with trying to investigate such odd moves is proving intent.

Odd movements

Dealers who executed the trades could respond by saying they were simply fulfilling the wishes of their clients and thus claim innocence, while it's possible that some orders were routed via overseas programme trades thus making policing difficult.

It's also worth noting that anecdotal evidence from other markets such as Hong Kong is that indices frequently display odd movements late in the day and regulators simply do not have the resources to probe every single extraordinary rise or fall.

However, difficulty in performing a task should not be an excuse for abandonment, especially when the STI's performance heavily influences sentiment and thus lies at the heart of the bulk of daily market action.

Just like disclosure lapses, index rigging interferes with the conduct of a 'fair, orderly and transparent market' and so should be scrutinised and corrective action should be taken.

Perhaps equally important is that if the JM, CMT and other blatantly large moves are investigated, the exchange must then disclose its findings so the public will not be in the dark - even if nothing untoward is detected.
 

ahleebabasingaporethief

Alfrescian
Loyal
Doubt they will do anything if its found to be a HUGE foreign fund(s) fixing the STI index.

Our GARMENT have got NO BALLS to fix foreigners. They only BULLY Singaporeans.
 

eeoror88

Alfrescian
Loyal
Fxxk Off, you timid stupid idiot !!

Still holding on to your milo tin ??

People already make from this minor up run !:mad:
 
Top