Uncle Sam,
What's your marital status?
Were you single or married with kids?
Boss' bicycle (some say with the seat removed) is his best companion. You say leh?
Uncle Sam,
What's your marital status?
Were you single or married with kids?
It would seem that many of you have a misconception regarding the definition of "retirement".
In your case, the term "retiree" conjures up images of someone hanging around at home with nothing much to do living off a measly pension or limited savings.
My vision of a retiree is someone like Bill Gates or Richard Branson or the late Steve Fossett or Jim Clark. (founder of netscape) ie people who no longer have to work for a living, who have fulfilled their goals and who now spend their time and their money realising their other passions.
What difference does that make? If you're implying that being married with kids requires makes taking risks a lot harder, then I'd like to point out that working as an employee is a lot riskier than running your own show.
Imagine having 3 children and a wife to support plus a mortgage and suddenly finding that your job has been taken over by FT.
On the other hand, if you're running you're own company, you have the ability to cut overheads or diversify when times are tough to keep your head above water.
Boss' bicycle (some say with the seat removed) is his best companion. You say leh?
Uncle Sam,
What's your marital status?
Were you single or married with kids?
What difference does that make?
Boss' bicycle (some say with the seat removed) is his best companion. You say leh?
so, u now got 2 million cash, ur wife oso got 2 million cash? ...... Lots of planning, proper discipline & execution are required. That is how we are able to retire ...
so, u now got 2 million cash, ur wife oso got 2 million cash? ...
. What we did was, after we got married, we spent on only ONE income. The other income, we saved and later invest. QUOTE]
You all can live with 1 salary yet having car, maid etc your salary really power lah ! Lucky you double power salary !
I do know many couples with power salary but they made a big mistake to spend it all. You are really indifferent couple I respect!.
why do u need to do that!
hehe... i am beginning to like you already. getting hysterical over points.
ok lah.. up you.
so, u now got 2 million cash, ur wife oso got 2 million cash? ...
Depends on what you mean by good. If you are here to check if you are underpaid compared to your peers, it will depend on your industry. In my industry, some grads are even earning $3,500 after 10 years.
If you are here to check if your salary is ok for Singapore living, then I say it is. Unlike what the others said, you can afford a simple car if you know how to manage your money.
Of course, if you want to break through that amount, you either need to work a lot harder and smarter than now, or be on your own (which also needs you to work harder and a lot smarter).
Some people are not suited to be on their own. They will be lost on things outside their scope, pick up slow, be too slow for changes and are not people-friendly. You may be like that. In this case, I would suggest you invest in some property and rent it out.
I m from engineering ground
It is alway more difficult in engineering industry
Middle-level executive now has difficulty in finding jobs that pay between $4000 to $5000 a month regardless whether degree or diploma holders :(
You all can live with 1 salary yet having car, maid etc your salary really power lah ! Lucky you double power salary !
One may necessary qualification, skill and experience but does not means employers will hire you and give a higher salary.
Nowadays many employees between age group of 35 to 45 salaries were stagnant and for them change jobs mostly will resulted pay cut for about $200 to $500. Even to applying section or department managers position, the employers will still only offer middle-level executive pay.
Middle-level executive now has difficulty in finding jobs that pay between $4000 to $5000 a month regardless whether degree or diploma holders :(
The original question of "Is My Salary OK?" have evolved into a discussion of retirement.
Talking about retirement and planning for it, the questions raised by Clone are very important.
I am surprised that Boss Sam simply brushed it aside. Whatever it is, hawker's input said it all.
The marital status question is very important because in my case, I married somebody of my level - both graduates. What we did was, after we got married, we spent on only ONE income. The other income, we saved and later invest. Lifestyle control is important. Avoided debts, drove cheaply [no COE or $5k COE] and stayed in HDB. This continued even after the kids came along. Hiring a domestic helper was also within the budget then. As years gone by, with good increments, promotion & bonuses then and without fear of sickening FT depressing wages or taking away our rice bowl, we are able to accumulate a fair bid.
Lots of planning, proper discipline & execution are required. That is how we are able to retire. Without my wife, it is unlikely I could retire now. She gave lots of support and provided the much needed discipline to stick with the plan.
BTW, both of us came from poor background and we have to support families of both sides as well.
Back to TS alantan27, how much you earn, whether ok or not, depends alot on your lifestyle and the choice you made in your life.
For the rest, thinking about early retirement, the above is one real life example of how it has worked out - go find someone who can help you realised your dream. Have more kids and vote the people who make your dream so hard to achieve out!
Bro po2wq, the answer to your question is partly found here: http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?125431-My-Friend-Jocelyn&p=1192161#post1192161
Lets just say we have more than enough to live very very comfortably on interest income alone.
Even with $4 million cash in SG, it is nothing because interest income is really low. More so, when the interest received can't even cover inflation. You are eating into your real dollar value without even spending a single cent!
In SG, one has to put that $4 million to good use like placing it in properties when the prices were at more acceptable level or other revenue generating assets. Guess you know whose policies drove property prices sky high?
And yes, in SG, it is better to die than to fall ill with protracted heavy medical expenses.
I really feel sorry for SG kids these days.
The 3 local banks preference share, at the very least, is still paying a 4.7% to 5.1% with a certain element of risk as well.
Nevertheless, going by your nick, you are not blur at all.
Bro Chinese, who did you vote for in the recent general election may I ask? It is the self serving party that created the whole mess. Singaporeans deserve the government they elected. I am afraid, come 2016, it may be too late as the massive number of new citizens may tilt the balance in favour of that self serving party.
Bro lifeafter41,
Personally I have not read the details of those preference shares issued by banks. However, just on the surface of it, one must realised a few risks, among others, involved:
1. For a start, you may want to google the followings characters - Kweku Adoboli, Jérôme Kerviel and Nick Leeson. It is likely that no payment will be received if the bank is not profitable. That could be a result of the work of a rogue trader. One never know when it will happened.
2. Missing payouts during the bad years may not be cumulative. Too bad if you missed a payment.
3. Likely to say goodbye to most of the principal amount if the bank went bust. Preferential shares generally rank just above ordinary shares but they are ranked way down the table. This, as against a government guaranteeing up to $250k for every account holder of every bank as it is in Oz.
4. What about tax? Is the amount payable after tax or before tax?
Bottomline, just off the cuff, why would any bank pay 4.7% to 5.1% for your funds when they could pay less than 1% for similar funding viz deposits. Perhaps those who had the bad experience of minibonds in SG could well remember and understand that there is no free lunch.
Hey you think I not blur, can you up me then? Leave me your nick, and I will return fave in due course.
Your truly,
a blur sotong :o
Bottomline, just off the cuff, why would any bank pay 4.7% to 5.1% for your funds when they could pay less than 1% for similar funding viz deposits. Perhaps those who had the bad experience of minibonds in SG could well remember and understand that there is no free lunch.
Your truly,
a blur sotong :o