• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Iran declares retaliation on Israel if US strikes Syria over chemical attack

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<nyt_headline version="1.0" type=" ">Strike on Syria Would Cause One on Israel, Iran Declares</nyt_headline><nyt_headline version="1.0" type=" "></nyt_headline>

<nyt_byline style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.75px;">By THOMAS ERDBRINK

</nyt_byline>Published: August 27, 2013


Iranian lawmakers and commanders issued stark warnings to the United States and its allies on Tuesday, saying any military strike on Syria would lead to a retaliatory attack on Israel fanned by “the flames of outrage.”

The warnings came against a backdrop of rising momentum among Western governments for a military intervention in the Syria conflict over what the United States, Britain, France and others have called undeniable evidence that President Bashar al-Assad’s forces used banned chemical weapons on civilians last week, killing hundreds. Mr. Assad has accused the insurgents who are trying to topple him of using such munitions.

Iran, which itself came under chemical weapons assault by Iraq during its eight-year war in the 1980s, has been a loyal ally of the Syrian government. Iranian hard-liners often say Syria is Iran’s first trench in a potential war with hostile Western powers. Iran has blamed Israel for the conflict in Syria, saying Israel is trying to bring down Mr. Assad.

“In case of a U.S. military strike against Syria, the flames of outrage of the region’s revolutionaries will point toward the Zionist regime,” the semiofficial Fars news agency quoted Mansur Haqiqatpur, an influential member of Parliament, as saying on Tuesday.

At the same time Iran has always taken the moral high ground on the issue of chemical weapons, actively opposing their use. If it turns out that Mr. Assad’s side deployed the weapons, it will be difficult for Iranian leaders to explain their support for the Syrian president to their people, analysts point out.

A potential military intervention by the United States in Syria also represents a test for Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani, who condemned the use of chemical weapons on his Twitter account on Monday, but stopped short of blaming either side in the Syrian conflict.

On Tuesday the new foreign minister of Iran, Mohammad Javad Zarif, stressed that Iran condemned the use of chemical weapons by any group. He also said Iran had pressed the Syrian government to assist the United Nations weapons inspectors who are in the country conducting an inquiry.

There is no evidence, he said, that chemical weapons were used by the Syrian government. But in remarks quoted by the official Islamic Republic News Agency. Mr. Zarif said there was some evidence that such munitions had been given to what he called Takfiri groups, referring to Syria’s insurgents. Takfiri is a disparaging term used by Muslims for extremist groups that accuse others of apostasy.

Many analysts close to Mr. Rouhani privately say that Syria is an obstacle to change inside Iran. The country’s hard-liners say any attack on Syria is in fact an act of war against Iran, and point to a support pact in which both nations have vowed to defend each other in case of a military attack by a third country.

“Naturally Iran does not want to lose Syria as a foothold in the region,” said Davoud Hermidas-Bavand, a professor of international relations at Allameh Tabatabaei University in Tehran.

“But in the long run a solution for Syria will mean that officials in Tehran can soften their stance towards the U.S.,” he said. “It means we would have a more open domestic atmosphere.”

Iran is widely seen as having close coordination with Hezbollah, the militant Shiite Lebanese organization that is an ideological ally. Both regard Israel as a common enemy, and Hezbollah is reported to have many rockets deployed in southern Lebanon capable of striking deep into Israeli territory.

Iran and Hezbollah are heavily engaged in helping Mr. Assad’s side in the Syria conflict. Iranian military advisers have been seen in Syria, and Iran provides military support and training to Hezbollah fighters, who have joined the Syrian armed forces in recent months retake rebel-held areas.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, meeting with visiting Sultan Qaboos bin Said al Said of Oman in Tehran on Monday, predicted the Syrian conflict would escalate far beyond its borders if other regional nations continued to aid the Syrian opposition.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I bet some hawks in Israel see this as an opputrunity to take out Iran before they develop nuckear weapons.
 

watchman8

Alfrescian
Loyal
I bet some hawks in Israel see this as an opputrunity to take out Iran before they develop nuckear weapons.
maybe that's why obama deliberately want to attack syria over chemical weapons used. This will surely incite Iran to attack Israel and everyone can legitimately whack Iran's nuclear facilities.
 

crossroads

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The madcaps in the ME are at it again. This is the most unstable place in the whole world because of the Muslim fanatics.
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
maybe that's why obama deliberately want to attack syria over chemical weapons used. This will surely incite Iran to attack Israel and everyone can legitimately whack Iran's nuclear facilities.

US can't afford to wage another long campaign against a big country after Iraq and Afghanistan

The other 2 wild cards are how China and Russia, countries which Iran's buddies, will react
 

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think the Israelis will welcome that because it will give them justification to strike at Iran's nuclear facilities and unload firepower on them to set them back a few decades. The Iranians are crazy to say all this and now Israeli can do a preemptive strike on Iran once US deals with Syria.

<nyt_headline version="1.0" type=" ">Strike on Syria Would Cause One on Israel, Iran Declares</nyt_headline><nyt_headline version="1.0" type=" "></nyt_headline>

<nyt_byline style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.75px;">By THOMAS ERDBRINK

</nyt_byline>Published: August 27, 2013


Iranian lawmakers and commanders issued stark warnings to the United States and its allies on Tuesday, saying any military strike on Syria would lead to a retaliatory attack on Israel fanned by “the flames of outrage.”

The warnings came against a backdrop of rising momentum among Western governments for a military intervention in the Syria conflict over what the United States, Britain, France and others have called undeniable evidence that President Bashar al-Assad’s forces used banned chemical weapons on civilians last week, killing hundreds. Mr. Assad has accused the insurgents who are trying to topple him of using such munitions.

Iran, which itself came under chemical weapons assault by Iraq during its eight-year war in the 1980s, has been a loyal ally of the Syrian government. Iranian hard-liners often say Syria is Iran’s first trench in a potential war with hostile Western powers. Iran has blamed Israel for the conflict in Syria, saying Israel is trying to bring down Mr. Assad.

“In case of a U.S. military strike against Syria, the flames of outrage of the region’s revolutionaries will point toward the Zionist regime,” the semiofficial Fars news agency quoted Mansur Haqiqatpur, an influential member of Parliament, as saying on Tuesday.

At the same time Iran has always taken the moral high ground on the issue of chemical weapons, actively opposing their use. If it turns out that Mr. Assad’s side deployed the weapons, it will be difficult for Iranian leaders to explain their support for the Syrian president to their people, analysts point out.

A potential military intervention by the United States in Syria also represents a test for Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani, who condemned the use of chemical weapons on his Twitter account on Monday, but stopped short of blaming either side in the Syrian conflict.

On Tuesday the new foreign minister of Iran, Mohammad Javad Zarif, stressed that Iran condemned the use of chemical weapons by any group. He also said Iran had pressed the Syrian government to assist the United Nations weapons inspectors who are in the country conducting an inquiry.

There is no evidence, he said, that chemical weapons were used by the Syrian government. But in remarks quoted by the official Islamic Republic News Agency. Mr. Zarif said there was some evidence that such munitions had been given to what he called Takfiri groups, referring to Syria’s insurgents. Takfiri is a disparaging term used by Muslims for extremist groups that accuse others of apostasy.

Many analysts close to Mr. Rouhani privately say that Syria is an obstacle to change inside Iran. The country’s hard-liners say any attack on Syria is in fact an act of war against Iran, and point to a support pact in which both nations have vowed to defend each other in case of a military attack by a third country.

“Naturally Iran does not want to lose Syria as a foothold in the region,” said Davoud Hermidas-Bavand, a professor of international relations at Allameh Tabatabaei University in Tehran.

“But in the long run a solution for Syria will mean that officials in Tehran can soften their stance towards the U.S.,” he said. “It means we would have a more open domestic atmosphere.”

Iran is widely seen as having close coordination with Hezbollah, the militant Shiite Lebanese organization that is an ideological ally. Both regard Israel as a common enemy, and Hezbollah is reported to have many rockets deployed in southern Lebanon capable of striking deep into Israeli territory.

Iran and Hezbollah are heavily engaged in helping Mr. Assad’s side in the Syria conflict. Iranian military advisers have been seen in Syria, and Iran provides military support and training to Hezbollah fighters, who have joined the Syrian armed forces in recent months retake rebel-held areas.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, meeting with visiting Sultan Qaboos bin Said al Said of Oman in Tehran on Monday, predicted the Syrian conflict would escalate far beyond its borders if other regional nations continued to aid the Syrian opposition.
 

watchman8

Alfrescian
Loyal
US can't afford to wage another long campaign against a big country after Iraq and Afghanistan

The other 2 wild cards are how China and Russia, countries which Iran's buddies, will react
Wars can be financed, it depends on whether the leaders want to go to the extremes.

Note the EU countries are unusually enthusiastic. It is like they have finally found the excuse to whack Syria and Iran. No reason that chemical weapons are any worse than carpet bombing which the USA does regularly.

I think USA and EU are just waiting for legitimate reason to clean up the Middle East. Iran has been pain in the ass for too long. This war will also cause inflation problem in china, and may even precipitate a china recession. One stone, many birds.
 

Awake

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Israel will respond with force to any attack from Syria

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/pqHKFRSF2hg?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Aug. 27 - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel will respond forcefully to any attempts to attack it. Deborah Lutterbeck reports.

 

Awake

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset


Netanyahu warns Israel will respond if attacked by Syria; US attack on Syria to last 'hours not days

<iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/_gzVvmp6paQ?rel=0" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="480"></iframe>

Published on Aug 27, 2013

This is the latest on the Syria issue where the Obama administration is not even considering going to Congress to get authorization for the attack.
Meanwhile Netanyahu, worried that Syria will attack Israel in response to US attacks on them, warns Israel will respond in force if attacked.
Also, Biden and Obama are both hypocrites re the first point:

 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
maybe that's why obama deliberately want to attack syria over chemical weapons used. This will surely incite Iran to attack Israel and everyone can legitimately whack Iran's nuclear facilities.

Yes Israel will take every opportunity to attack Iran if ever one rocket were to hit Israel. Iran is foolish if she thinks Israel is going to run away from a fight.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
US can't afford to wage another long campaign against a big country after Iraq and Afghanistan

The other 2 wild cards are how China and Russia, countries which Iran's buddies, will react
Those who want property prices to crash....
This is your chance to loon for WW3
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Yes Israel will take every opportunity to attack Iran if ever one rocket were to hit Israel. Iran is foolish if she thinks Israel is going to run away from a fight.

During the gulf war....Israel did not retaliate even though pelted with Iraqi scuds.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
During the gulf war....Israel did not retaliate even though pelted with Iraqi scuds.


Bro, then there was no loss of life. Most went into the sea.

But now it is definitely different. Israel is crying for blood this time. Iran is on the verge of going nuclear. Israel will not allow this!
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wars can be financed, it depends on whether the leaders want to go to the extremes.

Note the EU countries are unusually enthusiastic. It is like they have finally found the excuse to whack Syria and Iran. No reason that chemical weapons are any worse than carpet bombing which the USA does regularly.

I think USA and EU are just waiting for legitimate reason to clean up the Middle East. Iran has been pain in the ass for too long. This war will also cause inflation problem in china, and may even precipitate a china recession. One stone, many birds.

Look what Operation Iraqi freedom has done to the US economy.. Another long drawn occupation campaign will cause the US economy to slip into coma.

Most likely they'll send drones in to bomb Syrian chemical weapon storage and launch facilities. Eradicating chemical weapon capability is in the interests of other pro-western countries in ME like UAE and Israel.
 
Top