• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

iPhone 6, Applewatch, Singapore not involved??

B Man

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nope.

Apple develops some of its hardware/software outside the USA.

when it does, the:
1. VPs/CEO are not the ones going there. They stay put.
2. The engineering team flies into USA monthly

Singapore unfortunately was never in the development for any of the cutting edge stuff. More like as a backend manufacturing site with tax breaks. They did not even transfer any of the high tech stuff over to Singapore to be manufactured. Just the low end stuff that they could not care less if it was copied as it will have no commercial value outside of apple's doors.

The main software development work has to be done in Cupertino. If they did that outside the US, it would require the VPs & CEO to travel outside the US, slowing the development work.

The Spore R&D was working more on monitors & I think the speech recognition thing. Apple was manufacturing monitor in Spore & it made sense to have the team located in Spore.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Singapore unfortunately was never in the development for any of the cutting edge stuff. More like as a backend manufacturing site with tax breaks.

such as power adapters for older model macs. the design and manufacture were so poor that apple moved production of simple power adapters to japan.
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
The MIW should can all their crap about Singapore work on protecting intellectual property when nobody willing to do R&D work here, or rather do the 'back end' stuff and relabel the works as 'R&D' to get tax breaks from us!
 
Top