• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Indian national convicted for using unlicensed employment agent

RedHat

Alfrescian
Loyal

Indian national convicted for using unlicensed employment agent

Posted: 22 March 2013 1326 hrs

SINGAPORE: A 23-year-old Indian national has become the first employer to be convicted for using an unlicensed employment agent to hire a foreigner.

In February 2011, Sadh Aakash Raman engaged Balaguru S/O Amirthalingam to submit a work pass application for the foreigner, who is his uncle, to be hired as a general manager.

Sadh, the director of Times Supermarket, agreed to pay Balaguru $6,000 in agent fees once the application was approved by the manpower ministry.

He also gave his SingPass details to the unlicensed employment agent to submit the application.

Sadh pleaded guilty to one charge of engaging the services of an unlicensed employment agent.

He was also convicted of one charge of illegally employing a foreigner without a valid work pass.

Another three illegal employment charges against him were taken into consideration for the purposes of sentencing.

In total, Sadh was fined $4,500 and will have to spend 18 days in jail if he can't pay the fine.

This is the first time the Ministry of Manpower successfully prosecuted an employer for such an offence, since the revised Employment Agencies Act came into effect in April 2011.

In 2012, six employers were offered composition for similar offences.

- CNA/fa

 

RedHat

Alfrescian
Loyal

Supermarket boss fined for engaging unlicensed employment agent


20121109.195355_court.jpg


AsiaOne
Friday, Mar 22, 2013

An Indian national has been fined $2,000 for engaging the services of an unlicensed employment agent, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said today.

Sadh Aakash Raman (Sadh), 23, is the first employer to be prosecuted by MOM for engaging the services of an unlicensed agency since the Employment Agencies Act took effect in April 2011.

Sadh was the Director of Times Supermarket Pte Ltd when he committed the offence.

In February 2011, Sadh sought the agent's assistance in submitting an application for an Employment Pass for his uncle, Sadh Manoj Kumar, who was to be employed as a general manager.

Sadh had agreed to pay the unlicensed agent $6,000 once the work pass application was approved by MOM.

In June 2011, the same agent helped Sadh to find additional manpower for his company. As a result, Sadh hired Arumugam Alagesan, an Indian national.

However, Arumugam Alagesan held a valid work pass to work for another company as a senior warehouse manager. In addition, the accused was aware that Arumugam Alagesan did not have a valid work pass to be employed at Sadh's supermarket.

Sadh had never enquired whether the agent he used had possessed a valid EA licence issued by the Commissioner for Employment Agencies.

Here is the press release from MOM:

On March 21, 2013, 23-year-old Indian national Sadh Aakash Raman (Sadh) was charged in court for using the services of an unlicensed employment agent (EA).

Sadh had engaged Balaguru S/O Amirthalingam (Bala), who did not have a valid EA licence as required under Section 22A(1) of the Employment Agencies Act (EAA), to submit a work pass application for a foreigner to work in his company.

Sadh pleaded guilty in the Subordinate Courts to one charge of engaging the services of an unlicensed EA. He was also convicted of one charge of illegally employing a foreigner without a valid work pass.

Another three illegal employment charges against him were taken into consideration for the purposes of sentencing. In total, Sadh was fined $4,500 in default 18 days' imprisonment.

This is the first case which the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has successfully prosecuted an employer for engaging the services of an unlicensed EA, since the revised EAA came into effect in April 2011.

In 2012, six employers were offered composition for similar offences.

Facts of the Case

Sadh was the Director of Times Supermarket Pte Ltd. In February 2011, Sadh sought Bala's assistance to submit an application for an Employment Pass for his uncle, one Sadh Manoj Kumar to be employed as a general manager. Sadh agreed to pay a sum of $6,000 to Bala as agent fees once the work pass application was approved by MOM. He also provided his SingPass details to the unlicensed EA, Bala to submit the application.

In June 2011, Bala again helped Sadh to find additional manpower for the latter's company, when Sadh mentioned that he needed an inventory manager in his supermarket. Arumugam Alagesan, an Indian national, subsequently worked for Sadh's supermarket for about four months from June to September 2011.

Arumugam Alagesan held a valid work pass to work for another company as a senior warehouse manager. The accused was aware that Arumugam Alagesan did not have a valid work pass to be employed at Sadh's supermarket. Under the law, employing a foreign employee without a valid work pass is an offence under Section 5(1) of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act (EFMA).
Throughout Sadh's transactions with Bala, he had never enquired whether Bala had possessed a valid EA licence issued by the Commissioner for Employment Agencies.

Advisory from MOM

Under the EAA, it is an offence to use the services of any person not licensed by the Commissioner for Employment Agencies for recruitment and hiring needs. If found guilty, offenders can be fined up to $5,000 for each employee engaged through the unlicensed EA.

Members of the public are advised to use only MOM-licensed EAs for their employment needs. To protect their interests, they are encouraged to verify whether EAs are licensed through the EA Directory on the MOM website. All staff who are conducting EA work are registered with MOM. Members of the public should also request EA personnel for their registration cards to ascertain their status.

To enhance deterrence, MOM has amended the EFMA last year, and penalties for EFMA contraventions have increased. With the increase in penalties, offenders prosecuted for illegally employing foreign employees will be subject to minimum fines of $5,000, and higher maximum fines of up to $30,000 and/or 12 months' jail.

Members of the public who are aware of any individuals or EAs that are operating without a valid licence or have information on illegal employment activities should contact MOM at Tel: (65) 6438-5122 or email [email protected]. All information will be kept strictly confidential.


 
Top