Fook Gor, the 1st part yes, proportional representation based on GRC to ensure that the Chinese do not dominate entirely and minority groups are represented.
As for the 2nd part, hee hee... better ask those cronies that wear wigs to interpret. Remember that being inside the polling staion does not breach the regulation where candidates cannot be within a certain meters from the polling station since they are INSIDE the polling station. How else do these candidates got in to begin with?
Remember the Old Man once said that maybe there should be more than one vote per person?
At that time, most of us interpreted it as he wanted to give more votes to some than to others (he could still be meaning that). But assuming he was a fair guy and was looking at all the options of how to get minority representation (OK this is a big "if" because we all know that whatever he did was to screw the Opposition but just assuming that this was true), wouldn't PR through a GRC system have been a studied option?
Under such a system, for a 5-member GRC, you get, say, 6 votes with the sixth, compulsorily going to a minority candidate. Other than the minority candidate, all the other four candidates are elected based on the number of votes received but constrained by some restrictions that favour proportional representation. This would be a very interesting system - proportional representation yet with minority protection.
If this thought process did actually take place, then the final decision had been made in the interest of selfish control and at the detriment of fair play.