This is bloody nonsensical and an open lies. If Aljunied GRC were to remain in the hands of PAP instead of WP, will AIM terminate the contract based on the above reasoning that the GRC boundaries have changed? :oIo:
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Ho Ho Ho-sey ah - Ho Pin AIM replies. Happy now?
- Thread starter Confuseous
- Start date
This is bloody nonsensical and an open lies. If Aljunied GRC were to remain in the hands of PAP instead of WP, will AIM terminate the contract based on the above reasoning that the GRC boundaries have changed? :oIo:
It wasn't AIM who terminated the contract, it was WP.
WP screwed and and then turn around and lied to the public that it was AIM who terminated the contract.
Didn't you follow the news?
Obviously he kicked his own feet by admiting this is indeed a partisan transaction - for SINGLE PARTY. Why consolidate for the benefit of single party and not for the residents regardless of their party affiliation? Why not operate like power supply,water supply that benefit everyone in Singapapore and yet have two different set of systems when managing Town council?
Last edited:
It was not WP that lied but Leegime. Leegime screwed and then turn around and lie to the public that it was WP's fault. Don't you follow the news?
I fully agree with you. Computer is set up to cater to volumne and if this shitty computer cannot handle it why developed it in the first place and how to justify that this computer will benefit the town economically with such stupid limitation. This is called the utlimate lie to quickly get the guilt covered but the fox tail is still seen waging in the open.
GD, I think it's Tanah Merah you saw. I saw it too on the way from Gold Coast to Brisbane
After so many days, this is the best the millionaire scholars can come up with?
$8,000 savings - I bet that they did not take into account the increase in IT support cost for the town council as a result of the sale of the software.
'Cumbersome and inefficient' - so it is more efficient to enrich some PAP-owned companies?
There is NO rationale explanation of enriching a PAP-owned company at the expense of taxpayers.
Kinana, you speak like you still have Teo's sperm in your mouth. Pleasee.. either you swallow it or spit it out
I speak only the truth bro.
You speak like you got Sylvia's stuff in your mouth?
The press statement by THP appears illogical and inconsistent.
1) On what basis would AIM get better deal than the 14 Town Councils? AIM is afterall a $2 shell company with a virtual office. Why could AIM get deals and prices from NCS that the town councils could not?
2) The replacement of obsolete systems and software is a fairly common thing. Going by the timeline, the standard practice would be to call tender in 2009 and have the system ready by 2011. The option to extend would be used as a contingency in the event of unexpected delays. It is not standard practice to spend money to hire a consultant to tell you your system is old and should be replaced. It is also not standard practice to sell your obsolete system and then pay money to use it.
1) On what basis would AIM get better deal than the 14 Town Councils? AIM is afterall a $2 shell company with a virtual office. Why could AIM get deals and prices from NCS that the town councils could not?
2) The replacement of obsolete systems and software is a fairly common thing. Going by the timeline, the standard practice would be to call tender in 2009 and have the system ready by 2011. The option to extend would be used as a contingency in the event of unexpected delays. It is not standard practice to spend money to hire a consultant to tell you your system is old and should be replaced. It is also not standard practice to sell your obsolete system and then pay money to use it.
Wow, your information is more accurate than the PAP's newspapers?
There should not be a termination clause to cater to material causes. If the township outgrew the system, then there can be some price variation upwards but both sides cannot terminate the contract unless there is a contractual breach. So, Teo Ho Pin's explanation is hogwash with regards to the existence of the termination clause.
Who's chee?
WP chose to terminate the contract. Sylvia need to explain to the why she misled the public.
I must have hit the jackpot to attract so many reputation hits and awards. Keep this thread going boys! Kinana is made to make our taxpayers' monies at last.
GD, I think it's Tanah Merah you saw. I saw it too on the way from Gold Coast to Brisbane
Thanks bro. Yes, should be from GC to Brisbane.
Similar threads
