• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Groomsman found guilty of molesting, sexually assaulting bride in hotel suite on wedding night

Johnrambo

Alfrescian
Loyal
1653918751932.png


SINGAPORE — A 42-year-old man was found guilty on Monday (May 30) of molesting and sexually assaulting the wife of his newlywed friend on the couple’s wedding night in a hotel room suite.


The Singaporean, who was a groomsman during the wedding, claimed during the trial that he thought the victim was his own wife and that he was sleeping next to her at home.

Following several days of a trial that began in March 2020, he was convicted of one charge each of molestation and sexual assault.


None of the parties involved can be named due to a court order to protect the identity of the victim, who is now 39 years old. The media is not allowed to state the hotel’s name or the exact date the couple got married in 2016.


The couple, who dated for 11 years, got a divorce after the incident.

Principal District Judge Victor Yeo found that the victim and her ex-husband were credible and honest witnesses who had no reason to falsely implicate the accused.

The case turned on whether the victim’s account was sufficiently credible as opposed to the accused’s.

The judge then found that her testimony was “unusually convincing” — the threshold to convict an accused person of sexual offences.


DENIED TOUCHING VICTIM​


The victim’s ex-husband testified in court that the accused was his colleague, and they were close friends for about eight years before the wedding day.


During the wedding banquet that evening, part of this friend’s job as a groomsman was to “help” the groom to drink alcohol when guests gave them toasts, so that the groom would not get too drunk.


When the banquet was over, several of the 10 groomsmen, including the accused, and some bridesmaids took the leftover alcohol to the bridal suite and continued drinking there. The bride did not join in but went to sleep instead.


The groom and the accused both fell asleep on separate sofas in the living room, which was separated from the bedroom by a sliding door.

The victim testified that she woke up at about 6am and felt someone caressing her chest, as well as someone sexually assaulting her. Thinking that it was her husband, she told him to take a shower but received no response.


The touching stopped for a while before continuing. She then touched the man’s lower leg and thought he was not her husband because he was wearing jeans.


However, she did not say anything, thinking no one else could be in bed with her and because the bedroom was very dark.


When she turned and saw the man’s face, she realised that it was “much bigger and rounder” than her husband’s. She asked him who he was but did not get a response.


Feeling afraid, she got out of bed and went to the suite’s living room to look for her husband, who was still asleep in his wedding suit on a two-seater sofa. The groomsman then emerged shirtless from the bedroom.

The victim soon confronted him about what he did. He denied it at first, but then admitted to touching her chest but swore he did not “touch her below”.

Her husband, awake by then, told him to leave. The couple then discussed what to do and she decided to make a police report that same morning.

More at https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...ual-assault-bride-hotel-wedding-night-1911611
 
Top