• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Fewer MRT Trains During Off-Peak Period Because MRT Losses Are Unsustainable! Sinkies To Tighten Belts By Taking PMDs And Grab!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
nz_mrt_310819.jpg


Commuters may have to wait longer for trains during off-peak hours, as train operators consider cost-saving measures in the face of mounting losses.

Operating costs have risen as train services have become more reliable, and Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan said yesterday it was time to extend the focus from immediate fixes to include the system's long-term sustainability.

Noting that demand for train services is not uniform throughout the day, he said he would encourage rail operators to experiment with longer train intervals during off-peak times

Speaking at the SBS Transit (SBST) Sengkang Depot to celebrate improvements in rail reliability, Mr Khaw noted the MRT network recorded mean kilometres between failure (MKBF) of over one million train-km last month. This measures the distance travelled before a train fault that lasts more than five minutes. In 2017, the MRT network as a whole clocked 181,000 MKBF.

But train operators have expressed concerns about the cost of service improvements. Last month, SMRT Trains reported losses of $155 million in the 12 months to end-March this year, almost double that of a year ago, because of higher operating expenses. Spending on repairs and maintenance accounted for about 71 per cent of rail-fare revenue, up from just 45 per cent three years ago.

Meanwhile, SBS Transit's Downtown Line registered losses of $125 million over the past three years.

The Transport Ministry has said such losses are not sustainable and higher fares will be needed, even with rising operating subsidies by the Government for public transport in the next five years.

Talks have also begun between the National Transport Workers' Union and the Land Transport Authority on reviewing the year-old New Rail Financing Framework, which caps operators' earnings while giving them a measure of protection if costs outpace revenues.

SBS Transit trainer Renzo Chua, 48, conducting training with the help of a train driving simulator for drivers, in order to prepare them for emergency situations on the North East Line or Downtown Line. The simulator is among initiatives aimed at boo

Mr Khaw noted that initiatives by SMRT and SBST have led to greater cost efficiency and total savings of more than $25 million since 2015. These include the use of train driving simulators, and putting trains into energy-saving mode before they are deployed.

An adjustment of train frequencies based on commuter demand would also optimise the use of resources, said Mr Khaw, citing the example of the Taipei Metro and Hong Kong MTR, which have train intervals of up to 10 and 14 minutes respectively during off-peak hours.

"This also reduces unnecessary wear and tear on the system that drives up downstream maintenance costs," he noted.

Currently, SMRT and SBST trains arrive at stations every five to seven minutes during off-peak hours.

National University of Singapore transport infrastructure expert Raymond Ong said it was sensible to lengthen train intervals during non-peak hours to reduce unnecessary stress on the system.

But transport economist Michael Li from the Nanyang Technological University said it would make sense only if utilisation is relatively low during off-peak hours.

"If the off-peak utilisation rate of the train's capacity is high, it would not make sense to do a consolidation of the service even if operators have financial issues," he said.

Commuters too were concerned about the impact on them, with some like civil servant Nurul Rahmat, 32, wondering if the reduction in wear and tear from having off-peak trains run less frequently would make a significant cut in operating costs.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ators-seek-ways-to-manage-costs-for-long-term
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Didn't you just increase fares?

Apparently, the increase wasn't high enough. PAP needs to be more resolute and give in less to populist pressure, which would only lead to unsustainable losses for our trains and bankrupt the reserves.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This minister is a total idiot. Paying him $2 million a year is a total waste of money.

If wait for train is longer during non-peak, wouldn't sinkees who use train at those hours be upset?

Extending his logic further, why not just stop train services during non-peak hours so that SMRT can be profitable?
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Just vote for PAP & pay...don't complain. First they tell you, they need to improve the system, then they tell you, it is costly to improve the system. All the impressive on time schedule, improvements...etc..cost money. They are a monopolist, and for a monopolist to loose money...it must be the commuter's fault. They have been underpaying the transport providers, which coincidentally is owned by one...PAP indirectly. Just pay more & shut up! Just vote for PAP...& live with it.
 

hofmann

Alfrescian
Loyal
Apparently, the increase wasn't high enough. PAP needs to be more resolute and give in less to populist pressure, which would only lead to unsustainable losses for our trains and bankrupt the reserves.

They don't have the balls to do so, if not GST will be 9% already today.

PAP has lost its balls along the way.
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
This minister is a total idiot. Paying him $2 million a year is a total waste of money.

If wait for train is longer during non-peak, wouldn't sinkees who use train at those hours be upset?

Extending his logic further, why not just stop train services during non-peak hours so that SMRT can be profitable?
KNN henceforth the current off peak shall become peak and the current peak shall become peak peak aka peek as in karchng peek KNN
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How to be profitable when they're constantly building new MRT lines and stations? :rolleyes:

It's not just the cost of building, it's the maintenance and upkeep of those stations too.

Look at Circle Line Stage 6. Three more stations to 'close the loop'. Costs $4.85 bil to build, to be finished in 2025. Someone, somewhere is making a lot of money at the expense of the dumbass technocrats. :cool:

The lines and stations are built to 'buff up' the land/property prices in the surrounding areas, that's where HDB and the property developers swoop in.

And you wonder why the cost of living is skyrocketing. :wink:
 

greedy and cunning

Alfrescian
Loyal
Speaking at the SBS Transit (SBST) Sengkang Depot to celebrate improvements in rail reliability, Mr Khaw noted the MRT network recorded mean kilometres between failure (MKBF) of over one million train-km last month. This measures the distance travelled before a train fault that lasts more than five minutes. In 2017, the MRT network as a whole clocked 181,000 MKBF.

But train operators have expressed concerns about the cost of service improvements. Last month, SMRT Trains reported losses of $155 million in the 12 months to end-March this year, almost double that of a year ago, because of higher operating expenses. Spending on repairs and maintenance accounted for about 71 per cent of rail-fare revenue, up from just 45 per cent three years ago.

Meanwhile, SBS Transit's Downtown Line registered losses of $125 million over the past three years.

The Transport Ministry has said such losses are not sustainable and higher fares will be needed, even with rising operating subsidies by the Government for public transport in the next five years.

me think tis is khaw using same hdb accounting method
hence always showing losses.
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
They put in more trains because they brought in millions of foreigners. Now complain trains are not fully used during off-peak periods. They created their own problems, and expect us to sympathise and understand? :FU:
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
They put in more trains because they brought in millions of foreigners. Now complain trains are not fully used during off-peak periods. They created their own problems, and expect us to sympathise and understand? :FU:
KNN correct KNN ownself create problem then blame other people is @ginfreely forte KNN
 
Top