Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok
You are a bright kid.
You are a bright kid.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Edmund Kwok NKF Had Multiple Sex Partners with his Male and Female Nurses in NKF
- Thread starter gingerlyn
- Start date
He is an Elder at Zion BP Church in Serangoon Garden
Last edited:
Why the victim could not say no ?
Is the offer too good to refuse ? Is he offered a higher position in the company if he comply ? Or is he already given the position and now it is just payback time ?
Last edited:
Gerard Ee offered him the job because of this. He didn’t want a corrupt like his predecessor.
I want inside info from the faggots themselves. Others will then be able to google it.
Any update from the Church Pastor ?
http://www.zionserangoon.org.sg/about-us/our-leaders/
The Qualifications of (Church ) Elders
The character and effectiveness of any church is directly related to the quality of its leadership. That’s why Scripture stresses the importance of qualified church leadership and delineates specific standards for evaluating those who would serve in that sacred position.
The qualifications for elders are found in 1 Timothy 3:2-7 and Titus 1:6-8. According to these passages, an elder must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money, not fond of sordid gain, a good manager of his household, one who has his children under control with dignity, not a new convert, one who has a good reputation outside the church, self-controlled, sensible, able to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict, above reproach as God’s steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, loving what is good, just, and devout. (For an explanation of these qualifications, see pages 215-33 of The Master’s Plan for the Church by John MacArthur.)
The single, overarching qualification of which the rest are supportive is that he is to be “above reproach.” That is, he must be a leader who cannot be accused of anything sinful because he has a sustained reputation for blamelessness. An elder is to be above reproach in his marital life, his social life, his business life, and his spiritual life. In this way, he is to be a model of godliness so he can legitimately call the congregation to follow his example (Phil. 3:17). All the other qualifications, except perhaps teaching and management skills, only amplify that idea.
http://www.gty.org/resources/positio...ical-eldership
Any update from the Church Pastor ?
We understand you want to know more about the case. EK has admitted his mistake. It was a honest mistake. Let's move on.
Last edited:
What ? My church have gays ? No... No...we are not a gay church. You come and see for yourself. We are in Serangoon. Not Rangoon Road ok!
Last edited:
Any update from the Church Pastor ?
http://www.zionserangoon.org.sg/about-us/our-leaders/
The Qualifications of (Church ) Elders
The character and effectiveness of any church is directly related to the quality of its leadership. That’s why Scripture stresses the importance of qualified church leadership and delineates specific standards for evaluating those who would serve in that sacred position.
The qualifications for elders are found in 1 Timothy 3:2-7 and Titus 1:6-8. According to these passages, an elder must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money, not fond of sordid gain, a good manager of his household, one who has his children under control with dignity, not a new convert, one who has a good reputation outside the church, self-controlled, sensible, able to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict, above reproach as God’s steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, loving what is good, just, and devout. (For an explanation of these qualifications, see pages 215-33 of The Master’s Plan for the Church by John MacArthur.)
The single, overarching qualification of which the rest are supportive is that he is to be “above reproach.” That is, he must be a leader who cannot be accused of anything sinful because he has a sustained reputation for blamelessness. An elder is to be above reproach in his marital life, his social life, his business life, and his spiritual life. In this way, he is to be a model of godliness so he can legitimately call the congregation to follow his example (Phil. 3:17). All the other qualifications, except perhaps teaching and management skills, only amplify that idea.
http://www.gty.org/resources/positio...ical-eldership
On a serious note, I won't be surprised that his title will be revoked and he may be asked to step down from membership for a period of time.
People say very tight T-shirt showing their biceps, and literally squashing their nipples coupled with high or hooded collar are the cultural wear of a gay. Any of you know the nuances ?
Last edited:
just checked , Zion Serangoon Bible Presbyterian Church,
the Church has acted , forthwith, no more "Ruling Elder" Title ,
EK 's name and photo removed from Church Web Page :
http://www.dev.zionserangoon.org.sg/about-us/our-leaders/
Order from which top?
just checked , Zion Serangoon Bible Presbyterian Church,
the Church has acted , forthwith, no more "Ruling Elder" Title ,
EK 's name and photo removed from Church Web Page :
http://www.dev.zionserangoon.org.sg/about-us/our-leaders/
What they just recognised is wrong with the ruling elder title?
Similar threads
