• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

DPM Teo Chee Hean: Govt reviewing cyber-crime laws

MarrickG

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thoughtless comments have no place even on social media because a "single thoughtless comment can have immense reach and severe consequences".

While the Penal Code covers offences such as criminal intimidation in both the physical world and cyberspace, there are no specific laws protecting persons from cyber harassment, bullying and other anti-social acts on the Internet, said Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) Teo Chee Hean in Parliament yesterday.

DPM Teo, who is also Minister for Home Affairs, said his ministry will work with the ministries of Law and of Information, Communications and the Arts (Mica) to review the matter and consider the laws needed to address such situations.

Mr Teo was asked whether existing laws were adequate to protect Singaporeans against inappropriate or wrongful online behaviour.

Touching on the "changing complexion" of Singapore society, DPM Teo said there are those who feel "they should be allowed to express their views in an unfettered way".

But, he added: "On the other hand, when remarks or acts denigrate another culture, nationality or religion, members of the public and those groups who are the target want action to be taken against the perpetrators."

He added that the UK, Australia, India and the US have laws to protect people from cyber-bullying, cyber-stalking or cyber-harassment.

In reviewing Singapore's laws in these areas, the Government will also consider "enhancing civil remedies for those affected by wrongdoings which are not criminal in nature".

He said: "For example, an aggrieved party should be able to protect himself from falsehoods spread on the Net when suing for defamation and obtain a timely injunction to order the removal of any offensive statements... given its viral nature."

People must also be savvy in spotting and avoiding others with malicious intent.

On this, cyber-wellness initiatives will be part of the Government's efforts to protect online users.

Mica will give details about this later.


This article was first published in The New Paper.
 

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Why didnt TRE reveal what demand was made by LHL and LHY when they sent the lawyer letters?

Did they ask for the identity of the commenter?

yes, the succinct version of what is happening. people in toc and tre facebook are the first to get it. they pretty much deserve it for stupidly commenting openly instead of anonymously.
 
Top