https://m.sohu.com/a/348994141_665455?spm=smwp.home.fd-important.5.1571825774941UTLEaiP
老外拉下高铁紧急制动阀？“谣言”击中的焦虑
狐度10-23 16:35
文丨杜虎
今天（10月23日）一早，一则“外籍乘客拉下高铁紧急制动阀未被处理”的话题很快冲上了热搜。
网传的两段视频显示，一名外国乘客疑似拉下停靠在长沙南站的高铁紧急制动阀，但未受到处理，涉事外国人表情轻浮，对周围人形成“挑衅”姿态。有国内乘客当场怒斥乘务员处理不力，一张“你不尊重中国人”的视频截图广为流传，引发舆论质疑。
舆情持续发酵后，长沙铁路公安很快给出了回应，称事发21日晚上海虹桥开往广州南的G1305次列车上，并称已开始调查，将依法进行处理。23日中午，长沙铁路上级单位@广州铁路 发布微博对事件进行了说明，称系“一名外国乘客误碰15号车门手动按钮，导致车门鸣响关闭”，并非网传的外国乘客拉下高铁紧急制动阀。
社交媒体时代，新闻出现反转并不奇怪，但如此短时间内巨大反转，还是让很多情绪激昂的网友惊愕。有网友就调侃说，“我喷都喷完了，你才给我看这个？”
事实上，如果仔细观看最早在网上流传的两段视频会发现，视频只有国内乘客对乘务员“你不尊重中国人”、“有多远滚多远”的怒斥，没有“表情轻浮”外国乘客的辩解（也可以理解为语言障碍），也没有乘务员整个的沟通处置过程。换言之，这是一段缺少核心事实、没有头只有尾的视频，根本无法得出“外国乘客拉下高铁紧急制动阀”的结论。
但就是这么两段模糊的视频，经网络传播后掀起轩然大波，最后演变为对铁路官方处置不满的集体讨伐。是因为有人恶意造谣传谣，还是因为误会导致的误传，现在还不知道。但值得反思的是，近两年面对公共部门处理外籍人员时的差别态度，网上确实民愤很大。这也是谣言很快能被更多人采信和传播的情绪基础，其准确击中了大众的公平焦虑。
远的不说，近一点的“福州一高校留学生当街推搡交警”以及“南京地铁罚中国人不罚外国人”事件，都是因为对中国人和外国人区别执法引发巨大争议，最后在舆论的介入下才加重处罚或表示反思。
而在广州铁路的说明发布前，有网友找出了多条中国乘客按下紧急制动阀被处罚的案例，更是有意在引导舆论往这方面靠——
2019年7月13日，上海人李某上错高铁后拉下G7325次列车紧急制动阀，导致晚点五分钟，被罚款一千元；
2017年10月3日，旅客蔡某在湖北建始火车站拉下D2217次列车紧急制动阀，被襄阳铁路警方罚款500元。
上述两位中国乘客遭受的处罚，依据的是2014年起施行的《铁路安全管理条例》，其第77条规定了16项“禁止实施下列危害铁路安全的行为”，其中就包括“擅自移动铁路线路上的机车车辆，或者擅自开启列车车门、违规操纵列车紧急制动设备”。
如果这次真的只是“误碰车门手动按钮”，要不要受到处理？事发时的监控视频显示，该外国乘客在列车停靠时在车门口拿手机拍摄，并非有意触碰车门手动按钮，且该行为并未影响列车的运行，列车“正点开出长沙南站”。如果由此认定要处罚当事外国乘客，于法于情都说不通。
尽管被证明是“虚惊一场”，这场舆论风波也提醒相关执法部门，在处理外国人违反治安案件问题上，一定要秉持公平公正的原则，不留下执法上内外有别的话柄。
但另一方面，我们也要考虑到，处理外国人的治安管理案件，棘手的地方在于它存在着权限问题，在取证、确定处罚方式、执行等方面也存在着现实困难。涉及到权限，就会引出一系列的层级汇报机制，派出所如果不具备这个权限，就得层层请示，而指令结果下来又得再重复一遍。别说基层警员犯难，高铁乘警恐怕更吃不消。
当然，这么说不是为警方的不作为推卸责任，只是希望摆明在个别懈怠案例的背后，有着一整套仅凭他个人执法很难快速、高效推动的执法程序。在这样的情况下，如果真遇到外国人在高铁上胡作非为，后果轻微的，能忍则忍，能放则放，恐怕也是理性的选择。这个说到底，跟乘警是不是对外国人更宽容，关系不大。
所以面对涉外籍人员的案例，与其过于敏感地认定这是讨好外国人而宣泄情绪，不如多追问一下执法是不是面临一些程序困境。作为佐证，可以回顾高铁乘警处置霸座现象的过程，一开始也是不愿管、不敢管，但随着舆论压力变大，处置有了规范，对霸座、阻碍高铁等现象都有积极的处置处罚。
当然，也有一些外国人在违反交通规章时被处理，有的因为是留学生所以直接由学校处置。在这两种情况中，处理效率之所以高，是因为外国人违反交规是直接授权当事交警的，可以现场处罚。而留学生也赋权给高校处理，但具体到一般治安纠纷，更容易因权限、授权、程序等实际情况，令一线警员束手束脚。
总之，高铁上的不文明现象、甚至是违规情况越来越容易被社交媒体捕捉，成为社会关注的“富矿”。铁路公安因为经历过改革、改制的过程，随车乘警在业务规范、介入的主动性、职业能力等方面迫切面临升级的要求。同时，一些机制的实际也会反映到他们身上，责备个人的同时，舆论若能推动制度优化那就更好了。
Foreigners pull down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve? "谣言" hit anxiety

Fox degree 10-23 16:35
Wen Hao Du Hu
Early today (October 23), a topic of "foreign passengers pulling down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve was not processed" quickly rushed to the hot search.
The two videos of the network show that a foreign passenger suspected of pulling down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve parked at Changsha South Station, but it was not dealt with. The foreigners were frivolous and formed a "provocative" attitude towards the surrounding people. Some domestic passengers angered the flight attendants on the spot, and a video clip of "You don't respect the Chinese" was widely circulated, causing public opinion to question.

After the lyrical continuous fermentation, the Changsha Railway Public Security quickly gave a response, saying that the Haihong Bridge was on the G1305 train to Guangzhou South on the 21st, and said that the investigation had begun and it would be dealt with according to law. At noon on the 23rd, the Changsha Railway's superior unit @广州铁路 issued a microblog to explain the incident, saying that "a foreign passenger accidentally touched the No. 15 door manual button, causing the door to sound off", not the foreign passengers of the network. High-speed rail emergency brake valve.

In the era of social media, it is not surprising that the news has reversed, but such a huge reversal in a short period of time has caused many emotional netizens to be shocked. Some netizens ridiculed and said, "I sprayed all the spray, did you show me this?"
In fact, if you carefully watch the two videos that were first circulated on the Internet, you will find that only the domestic passengers are angry at the flight attendants, "You don't respect the Chinese," "How far is it," and there is no "floating" foreign passengers. Defence (also can be understood as a language barrier), and there is no entire communication process for the flight attendants. In other words, this is a video that lacks core facts and has no head and tail. It is impossible to conclude that “foreign passengers have pulled down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve”.
However, it is such a two-stage vague video that, after being spread by the Internet, has caused a great uproar and finally evolved into a collective crusade against the official disposition of the railway. It is because someone has maliciously made a rumor, or because of misunderstanding caused by misunderstanding, I still don't know. However, it is worth rethinking that in the past two years, when faced with the different attitudes of the public sector in dealing with foreigners, the Internet is indeed very angry. This is also the emotional basis that rumors can soon be accepted and disseminated by more people, which accurately hit the public's fair anxiety.
Far from saying that the recent "Fuzhou University students in the street to push the traffic police" and "Nanjing subway penalties for Chinese people do not punish foreigners" are all because of the huge dispute between Chinese and foreigners, and finally in public opinion. The intervention is only aggravating or reflecting.

Before the announcement of the Guangzhou Railway, some netizens found out that many Chinese passengers were punished for pressing the emergency brake valve, and they were interested in guiding public opinion to rely on this aspect.
On July 13, 2019, Shanghai Li, who was on the wrong high-speed rail, pulled down the G7235 train emergency brake valve, resulting in a fine of 1,000 yuan after five minutes late;
On October 3, 2017, the passenger Cai Mou pulled down the D2217 train emergency brake valve at the Jianshi Railway Station in Hubei, and was fined 500 yuan by the Shenyang Railway Police.
The penalties imposed by the above two Chinese passengers are based on the Railway Safety Management Regulations implemented in 2014. Article 77 of the regulations stipulates 16 “prohibitions to implement the following acts that endanger railway safety”, including “unauthorized movement of railways”. Locomotives on the line, or unauthorized opening of train doors, illegally operating train emergency braking equipment."
If this time is really just "missing the door manual button", should it be dealt with? The surveillance video at the time of the incident showed that the foreign passenger took the mobile phone at the door of the train when the train stopped. It did not intentionally touch the door manual button, and the behavior did not affect the operation of the train. The train “opened the Changsha South Station at the right point”. If it is determined that the foreign passengers are to be punished, it is impossible to understand the law.

Although it proved to be a "false alarm", this public opinion storm also reminded relevant law enforcement agencies that in dealing with foreigners' violations of public security cases, we must uphold the principle of fairness and justice, and not leave a separate voice inside and outside the law enforcement.
On the other hand, we must also consider that the most difficult part of dealing with foreigners' security management cases is that they have jurisdiction problems, and there are also practical difficulties in obtaining evidence, determining punishment methods, and implementing them. When it comes to permissions, it will lead to a series of hierarchical reporting mechanisms. If the police station does not have this permission, it will have to ask for layers, and the results will be repeated again. Not to mention that the grassroots police officers are guilty, and the high-speed rail passengers may not be able to eat.
Of course, this is not to shirk responsibility for the police's inaction. It is only hoped that behind the individual slack case, there is a set of law enforcement procedures that are difficult to promote quickly and efficiently based on his personal law enforcement. Under such circumstances, if you encounter a foreigner who is mischievous on the high-speed rail, the consequences are slight, you can bear it, and you can let it go, I am afraid it is also a rational choice. In the end, whether it is more tolerant to foreigners with the police is not relevant.
Therefore, in the face of foreign-related personnel cases, rather than being too sensitive to believe that this is to please foreigners and vent their emotions, it is better to ask whether law enforcement is facing some procedural dilemmas. As evidence, we can review the process of the high-speed rail passengers handling the stagnation phenomenon. At the beginning, they were unwilling to manage and dare not manage. However, as the pressure of public opinion became larger, the disposal was standardized, and there were positive phenomena such as tyrants and obstacles to high-speed rail. Disposal penalty.

Of course, there are also some foreigners who are dealt with in violation of traffic regulations, and some are directly disposed of by the school because they are international students. In both cases, the high efficiency of processing is because foreigners who violate the regulations are directly authorized to traffic police, and can be punished on the spot. The international students are also empowered to deal with colleges and universities, but specific to general public security disputes, it is easier to make the frontline police officers constrained by the actual situation of authority, authorization, procedures and so on.
In short, the uncivilized phenomenon on the high-speed rail, and even the violations, are more and more easily captured by social media and become the "rich mine" of social concern. Because the railway public security has experienced the process of reform and restructuring, the on-board passengers are urgently facing the requirements of upgrading in terms of business norms, initiative, and professional ability. At the same time, the actuality of some mechanisms will be reflected in them. While blaming individuals, it is better if public opinion can promote institutional optimization.
老外拉下高铁紧急制动阀？“谣言”击中的焦虑
狐度10-23 16:35
文丨杜虎
今天（10月23日）一早，一则“外籍乘客拉下高铁紧急制动阀未被处理”的话题很快冲上了热搜。
网传的两段视频显示，一名外国乘客疑似拉下停靠在长沙南站的高铁紧急制动阀，但未受到处理，涉事外国人表情轻浮，对周围人形成“挑衅”姿态。有国内乘客当场怒斥乘务员处理不力，一张“你不尊重中国人”的视频截图广为流传，引发舆论质疑。
舆情持续发酵后，长沙铁路公安很快给出了回应，称事发21日晚上海虹桥开往广州南的G1305次列车上，并称已开始调查，将依法进行处理。23日中午，长沙铁路上级单位@广州铁路 发布微博对事件进行了说明，称系“一名外国乘客误碰15号车门手动按钮，导致车门鸣响关闭”，并非网传的外国乘客拉下高铁紧急制动阀。
社交媒体时代，新闻出现反转并不奇怪，但如此短时间内巨大反转，还是让很多情绪激昂的网友惊愕。有网友就调侃说，“我喷都喷完了，你才给我看这个？”
事实上，如果仔细观看最早在网上流传的两段视频会发现，视频只有国内乘客对乘务员“你不尊重中国人”、“有多远滚多远”的怒斥，没有“表情轻浮”外国乘客的辩解（也可以理解为语言障碍），也没有乘务员整个的沟通处置过程。换言之，这是一段缺少核心事实、没有头只有尾的视频，根本无法得出“外国乘客拉下高铁紧急制动阀”的结论。
但就是这么两段模糊的视频，经网络传播后掀起轩然大波，最后演变为对铁路官方处置不满的集体讨伐。是因为有人恶意造谣传谣，还是因为误会导致的误传，现在还不知道。但值得反思的是，近两年面对公共部门处理外籍人员时的差别态度，网上确实民愤很大。这也是谣言很快能被更多人采信和传播的情绪基础，其准确击中了大众的公平焦虑。
远的不说，近一点的“福州一高校留学生当街推搡交警”以及“南京地铁罚中国人不罚外国人”事件，都是因为对中国人和外国人区别执法引发巨大争议，最后在舆论的介入下才加重处罚或表示反思。
而在广州铁路的说明发布前，有网友找出了多条中国乘客按下紧急制动阀被处罚的案例，更是有意在引导舆论往这方面靠——
2019年7月13日，上海人李某上错高铁后拉下G7325次列车紧急制动阀，导致晚点五分钟，被罚款一千元；
2017年10月3日，旅客蔡某在湖北建始火车站拉下D2217次列车紧急制动阀，被襄阳铁路警方罚款500元。
上述两位中国乘客遭受的处罚，依据的是2014年起施行的《铁路安全管理条例》，其第77条规定了16项“禁止实施下列危害铁路安全的行为”，其中就包括“擅自移动铁路线路上的机车车辆，或者擅自开启列车车门、违规操纵列车紧急制动设备”。
如果这次真的只是“误碰车门手动按钮”，要不要受到处理？事发时的监控视频显示，该外国乘客在列车停靠时在车门口拿手机拍摄，并非有意触碰车门手动按钮，且该行为并未影响列车的运行，列车“正点开出长沙南站”。如果由此认定要处罚当事外国乘客，于法于情都说不通。
尽管被证明是“虚惊一场”，这场舆论风波也提醒相关执法部门，在处理外国人违反治安案件问题上，一定要秉持公平公正的原则，不留下执法上内外有别的话柄。
但另一方面，我们也要考虑到，处理外国人的治安管理案件，棘手的地方在于它存在着权限问题，在取证、确定处罚方式、执行等方面也存在着现实困难。涉及到权限，就会引出一系列的层级汇报机制，派出所如果不具备这个权限，就得层层请示，而指令结果下来又得再重复一遍。别说基层警员犯难，高铁乘警恐怕更吃不消。
当然，这么说不是为警方的不作为推卸责任，只是希望摆明在个别懈怠案例的背后，有着一整套仅凭他个人执法很难快速、高效推动的执法程序。在这样的情况下，如果真遇到外国人在高铁上胡作非为，后果轻微的，能忍则忍，能放则放，恐怕也是理性的选择。这个说到底，跟乘警是不是对外国人更宽容，关系不大。
所以面对涉外籍人员的案例，与其过于敏感地认定这是讨好外国人而宣泄情绪，不如多追问一下执法是不是面临一些程序困境。作为佐证，可以回顾高铁乘警处置霸座现象的过程，一开始也是不愿管、不敢管，但随着舆论压力变大，处置有了规范，对霸座、阻碍高铁等现象都有积极的处置处罚。
当然，也有一些外国人在违反交通规章时被处理，有的因为是留学生所以直接由学校处置。在这两种情况中，处理效率之所以高，是因为外国人违反交规是直接授权当事交警的，可以现场处罚。而留学生也赋权给高校处理，但具体到一般治安纠纷，更容易因权限、授权、程序等实际情况，令一线警员束手束脚。
总之，高铁上的不文明现象、甚至是违规情况越来越容易被社交媒体捕捉，成为社会关注的“富矿”。铁路公安因为经历过改革、改制的过程，随车乘警在业务规范、介入的主动性、职业能力等方面迫切面临升级的要求。同时，一些机制的实际也会反映到他们身上，责备个人的同时，舆论若能推动制度优化那就更好了。
Foreigners pull down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve? "谣言" hit anxiety

Fox degree 10-23 16:35
Wen Hao Du Hu
Early today (October 23), a topic of "foreign passengers pulling down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve was not processed" quickly rushed to the hot search.
The two videos of the network show that a foreign passenger suspected of pulling down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve parked at Changsha South Station, but it was not dealt with. The foreigners were frivolous and formed a "provocative" attitude towards the surrounding people. Some domestic passengers angered the flight attendants on the spot, and a video clip of "You don't respect the Chinese" was widely circulated, causing public opinion to question.

After the lyrical continuous fermentation, the Changsha Railway Public Security quickly gave a response, saying that the Haihong Bridge was on the G1305 train to Guangzhou South on the 21st, and said that the investigation had begun and it would be dealt with according to law. At noon on the 23rd, the Changsha Railway's superior unit @广州铁路 issued a microblog to explain the incident, saying that "a foreign passenger accidentally touched the No. 15 door manual button, causing the door to sound off", not the foreign passengers of the network. High-speed rail emergency brake valve.

In the era of social media, it is not surprising that the news has reversed, but such a huge reversal in a short period of time has caused many emotional netizens to be shocked. Some netizens ridiculed and said, "I sprayed all the spray, did you show me this?"
In fact, if you carefully watch the two videos that were first circulated on the Internet, you will find that only the domestic passengers are angry at the flight attendants, "You don't respect the Chinese," "How far is it," and there is no "floating" foreign passengers. Defence (also can be understood as a language barrier), and there is no entire communication process for the flight attendants. In other words, this is a video that lacks core facts and has no head and tail. It is impossible to conclude that “foreign passengers have pulled down the high-speed rail emergency brake valve”.
However, it is such a two-stage vague video that, after being spread by the Internet, has caused a great uproar and finally evolved into a collective crusade against the official disposition of the railway. It is because someone has maliciously made a rumor, or because of misunderstanding caused by misunderstanding, I still don't know. However, it is worth rethinking that in the past two years, when faced with the different attitudes of the public sector in dealing with foreigners, the Internet is indeed very angry. This is also the emotional basis that rumors can soon be accepted and disseminated by more people, which accurately hit the public's fair anxiety.
Far from saying that the recent "Fuzhou University students in the street to push the traffic police" and "Nanjing subway penalties for Chinese people do not punish foreigners" are all because of the huge dispute between Chinese and foreigners, and finally in public opinion. The intervention is only aggravating or reflecting.

Before the announcement of the Guangzhou Railway, some netizens found out that many Chinese passengers were punished for pressing the emergency brake valve, and they were interested in guiding public opinion to rely on this aspect.
On July 13, 2019, Shanghai Li, who was on the wrong high-speed rail, pulled down the G7235 train emergency brake valve, resulting in a fine of 1,000 yuan after five minutes late;
On October 3, 2017, the passenger Cai Mou pulled down the D2217 train emergency brake valve at the Jianshi Railway Station in Hubei, and was fined 500 yuan by the Shenyang Railway Police.
The penalties imposed by the above two Chinese passengers are based on the Railway Safety Management Regulations implemented in 2014. Article 77 of the regulations stipulates 16 “prohibitions to implement the following acts that endanger railway safety”, including “unauthorized movement of railways”. Locomotives on the line, or unauthorized opening of train doors, illegally operating train emergency braking equipment."
If this time is really just "missing the door manual button", should it be dealt with? The surveillance video at the time of the incident showed that the foreign passenger took the mobile phone at the door of the train when the train stopped. It did not intentionally touch the door manual button, and the behavior did not affect the operation of the train. The train “opened the Changsha South Station at the right point”. If it is determined that the foreign passengers are to be punished, it is impossible to understand the law.

Although it proved to be a "false alarm", this public opinion storm also reminded relevant law enforcement agencies that in dealing with foreigners' violations of public security cases, we must uphold the principle of fairness and justice, and not leave a separate voice inside and outside the law enforcement.
On the other hand, we must also consider that the most difficult part of dealing with foreigners' security management cases is that they have jurisdiction problems, and there are also practical difficulties in obtaining evidence, determining punishment methods, and implementing them. When it comes to permissions, it will lead to a series of hierarchical reporting mechanisms. If the police station does not have this permission, it will have to ask for layers, and the results will be repeated again. Not to mention that the grassroots police officers are guilty, and the high-speed rail passengers may not be able to eat.
Of course, this is not to shirk responsibility for the police's inaction. It is only hoped that behind the individual slack case, there is a set of law enforcement procedures that are difficult to promote quickly and efficiently based on his personal law enforcement. Under such circumstances, if you encounter a foreigner who is mischievous on the high-speed rail, the consequences are slight, you can bear it, and you can let it go, I am afraid it is also a rational choice. In the end, whether it is more tolerant to foreigners with the police is not relevant.
Therefore, in the face of foreign-related personnel cases, rather than being too sensitive to believe that this is to please foreigners and vent their emotions, it is better to ask whether law enforcement is facing some procedural dilemmas. As evidence, we can review the process of the high-speed rail passengers handling the stagnation phenomenon. At the beginning, they were unwilling to manage and dare not manage. However, as the pressure of public opinion became larger, the disposal was standardized, and there were positive phenomena such as tyrants and obstacles to high-speed rail. Disposal penalty.

Of course, there are also some foreigners who are dealt with in violation of traffic regulations, and some are directly disposed of by the school because they are international students. In both cases, the high efficiency of processing is because foreigners who violate the regulations are directly authorized to traffic police, and can be punished on the spot. The international students are also empowered to deal with colleges and universities, but specific to general public security disputes, it is easier to make the frontline police officers constrained by the actual situation of authority, authorization, procedures and so on.
In short, the uncivilized phenomenon on the high-speed rail, and even the violations, are more and more easily captured by social media and become the "rich mine" of social concern. Because the railway public security has experienced the process of reform and restructuring, the on-board passengers are urgently facing the requirements of upgrading in terms of business norms, initiative, and professional ability. At the same time, the actuality of some mechanisms will be reflected in them. While blaming individuals, it is better if public opinion can promote institutional optimization.
