• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Dog on board MRT train stirs netizens

cooleo

Alfrescian
Loyal
There's nothing wrong with dogs on trains. Most of them are a lot cleaner than the filthy humans the poor dogs have to share the train with.

first_class_mrt_passenger-thumbnail

:eek: Sam why u insulting your own race?
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
The simple answer is we are much lower in civilisation and hence will behave badly if given this freedom. The truth is probably most Asian authorities find it easier to just ban something if it has potential to cause problems... ban eating/drinking in trains, ban pets in public transport, ban public speaking... so if the solution is always to ban something then people will just behave like robots.

The issue is poor values, which have been incalculated from young.
 

J_Tay

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pets are allowed in first-world countries because their owners are very responsible and the animals are well-behaved. In 'other' places owners don't clean up their dogs' shit and their dogs are fond of causing a din.
 

KNNBCCB

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Pets are allowed in first-world countries because their owners are very responsible and the animals are well-behaved. In 'other' places owners don't clean up their dogs' shit and their dogs are fond of causing a din.

Sinkapooor also first world cuntry but the petz are more well behaved than most of the sinkies :eek:
 

bullfrog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yea, what would happen if the dog has a bomb in its belly planted by the terrorist?

The photograph has caused a buzz among netizens, many of whom cried foul over SMRT's lack of vigilance.



Teacher Rose Lim, 56, said: "I know it's hard for them (SMRT staff) to check all bags, but what if the dog was something more dangerous, like a bomb?"

She added: "They should really look into their security system and identify the loophole."

Technical officer Bernadette Ong, 41, said: "If people want more stringent checks involving guard dogs or metal detectors, they have to be prepared that it will take up more of their time."

The SMRT spokesman assured the public that their staff and security personnel look out for suspicious people and items.
 
Top