• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Dispute over missing ring's value

D

Da Qiao

Guest

Oct 27, 2010

Dispute over missing ring's value

By Selina Lum

THE value of a 6.41-carat diamond ring was yesterday at issue in a hearing into the suit brought by an American multimillionaire who said she lost it at the Shangri-La hotel. Testifying via video link from New York on Day Two of the hearing was a senior executive from auction house Christie's, which valued the ring at US$220,000 (S$286,400), echoing the assessment of the jeweller who had sold the ring to Ms Anne Hendricks Bass.

Ms Bass is suing the hotel for compensation for the missing ring, which she said she lost during her stay there in February last year. The hotel's gem expert, who took into account the prices of gold and diamonds, had concluded in his report that the ring was worth US$50,000 to US$60,000. Lawyer K. Anparasan, for the hotel, questioned the way in which Ms Daphne Lingon, a 17-year veteran of Christie's, arrived at her opinion, faulting her for not doing independent calculations.

But she replied that calculating the ring's value the way the hotel's valuer had done was like trying to arrive at the value of a Picasso painting by totting up the cost of the frame and the canvas. The estimate, she said, had to factor in the creator of the piece and its demand in the marketplace. She added that in this case, the fact that the ring was made by famed Parisian jeweller Joel Arthur Rosenthal, better known as JAR, was the largest factor in deciding its value.


 
Top