• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

CPF is a time bomb

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=2]CPF is a time bomb[/h]
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
PostDateIcon.png
June 6th, 2014 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Contributions


CPF is a ticking political time bomb that the govt. is trying to defuse without much success. The 2.5% interest rate paid on ordinary balance is just a political ‘bribe’ paid to placate the people. So what if it is 2.5% p.a. risk-free, can you really take out your CPF funds if you need it?

The long journey into CPF hell was simply political – LKY wanted to harness economic power using political influence. From the late 60s to 70s, the Singapore govt. pulled in foreign MNC investments and manufacturing expertise via tax incentives like pioneer status, etc. As the Singapore economy took off, LKY initiated the CPF as a forced saving plan or accumulated capital source. To achieve full employment, husband & wife were required to go out to work. The ‘Stop at Two’ family planning policy was not Malthusian in intent – the true intention was economic! Less time spent on child bearing & upbringing meant more time spent working! That was why LKY is still so unrepentant to this day – it was economic not social.

The CPF was harnessed & channeled to drive Govt. linked companies for the domestic economy via population first followed by outward investment via Temasek Holdings & GIC. Truth be told, LKY was more communist than capitalist. He believed that the govt. should be in control of economic power in addition to political power. No surprise then that local entrepreneurship in Singapore is quite stagnant plus SMEs are quite weak.

The govt. has dominated the domestic economy with over 60% as well as acquired over 80% of land through the Compulsory Land Acquisitions Act. Our own CPF was used for funding GLCs and to acquire vasts tracts of private land for pennies.

The 2000s destroyed Singapore govt’s capital intensive investment policy – ACC 1998, Internet & China’s rise all contributed to the demise of past economic growth pillars! Post-2000, what has kept Singapore seemingly growing economically are foreign population growth ponzi, the construction bubble and the IRs {casinos}. As our local PMET class is disintegrating, the CPF is not growing as fast to accumulate capital – Temasek Holdings has to raise capital via capital markets.

The current govt. policy of PROFIT MAXIMIZATION across all sectors – GLCS, STAT BOARDS & Govt fees & levies – they are pressing for cost push inflation. What are the CPF implications? Inflation robs CPF balances as 2.5% is insufficient against rampant inflation. It also gives the govt. an excuse to retain more CPF sums to meet inflation for retirement. You see, it is all a game where HEADS THEY WIN, TAILS YOU LOSE!

CPF-is-a-time-bomb
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Not enough sinkees are awake to see how the government is ripping them off on the CPF.

$300k saved over 30 years via $10k a year would net you $450k;
$300k invested in S&P over 30 years via 10k a year would net you $1.3 million, a difference of $850k!!!!!!!
 

cunnilaubu

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Not enough sinkees are awake to see how the government is ripping them off on the CPF.

$300k saved over 30 years via $10k a year would net you $450k;
$300k invested in S&P over 30 years via 10k a year would net you $1.3 million, a difference of $850k!!!!!!!

How many sinkies contribute 10K a year in CPF?
And with MS increases at an average of 8K pa, most Sinkies can never be able to meet the MS requirement.
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nobody believed that CPF is bankrupt...well when it explodes...BR..OOM ! it will be too late,cry and beat your chests also no use.Too bad,brainwashed and greedy selfish and balls-less sinkees are blur-blobs and in denial mode and scared to know the truth.
 

Lionheart

Alfrescian
Loyal
everything is now a time bomb
the world is also a time bomb
might as well blow your own stupid head
it's the greatest time bomb
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
The way I looked at this, Sinkie deserved what's coming to them. In the early 80s cost of living wasn't so high but was already increasing. That is when their CPF was getting locked up coming to the 90s. Yet these Sinkie let things be and ALLOW the PAP to do more damage to their livelihood but not only locking up their funds but started to rampantly increase the locked up amount across all tbe account. Still these Sinkie let things be.
Things only started to boil over when their cost of living went so high and they now faced extinction.
Serves tbe Sinkie right when they did not bother to correct issues after issues, giving complete trust and control to the PAP.
And now they suddenly want back control of their money.
Tan ku ku.
 
Top