• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Companies criticised after demanding female staff ‘book’ maternity leave years ahead

IronMaiden

Alfrescian
Loyal

Chinese companies criticised after demanding female staff ‘book’ maternity leave years ahead


China National Radio says firms are breaking the law by requiring employees to follow ‘second-child’ timetables

PUBLISHED : Monday, 11 January, 2016, 2:36pm
UPDATED : Monday, 11 January, 2016, 2:49pm

Gloria Chan
[email protected]

da4b4850-b81f-11e5-9ce7-2395197ababe_1280x720.jpg


The mainland relaxed its one-child policy at the start of the year. Photos: Xinhua

China National Radio criticised companies for establishing “second-child timetables” for their staff and asking employees to submit applications for having a second child at least one year in advance.

The mainland on January 1 relaxed its population-control policies, allowing all couples to have two children.

According to the radio report, companies in several provinces including Jilin and Shandong are asking women employees who want to become pregnant to do so at specific times, and submit applications. Otherwise, they would have to wait until other staff had their babies and a “window” opened. Some women say they have booked out times as far in advance as 2018.

Companies responded by saying that if a large number of staff took maternity leave at the same time, business would suffer.

The commentary by China National Radio slammed the companies as being “unlawful, unreasonable, and heartless” for setting up the timetable.

It added that under mainland law employers did not have a right to interfere in women employees’ reproduction.



 
Top