I have sang praises about Ken more than anyone else in this forum and over many moons. Trueif SPH want to hang it hook on a single individual its quite a stretch.
By the way this forum and society can only succeed if we keep discussions going on a regular basis, whether views are skewed, cynical, slanted or pure vitriol. The cream will always rise to the top. The trick is to have the forum in the first place and keeping it busy with contribution even at times of an event droughtagree
Occasional forays though tempting to carve out an image of self righteousness, being objective, on a separate plane of being a higher being does no one any good except for one's ego i steer clear from the rascist/non rascist sparring... Vexatious
In essence don't worry too much about the person but wait for the occasional gems to make for good argument and a way forward. True
Name me one other than Ken Kwek and show his or her content over the years . It will let the rest know that SPH is not what I paint it out to be.
you got me here ... The scholars r out... Gang Han, Sumiko, chua sis-es, that andy guy & indian rohith something ... Vebose n convulated occasionally ok, KP Ho op-ed once in a while he is not staff,
jenadas Devan too arty farty snoot for me...
Tough call, brothel i hv no issue, most familiar with the regular kind...
so this term describing times house or sph, well, kind of doing injustice to the term & my lovely chickens
:-)
no issues mate...