Australia migrant muslim relatives kidnap women, terrorize them for converting to Christianity

[mudhatter]

There actually is. It's called 'muhammadiyah', kinda like a variant of mohameddan.

There is not. No one in the world recognizes any such religion. If you can find billions of adherents of any such religion, you are free to ask them to register their names and memberships along with entries on ID cards/passports/etc showing the said religion.

This is unlike Christ-ianity.

Because they have been in jiuhu even before the mohameddan religion. If you're not happy, you can fuck off.

Kafir pendatang have never been in jiuhu before bumiputera, by default.

Obviously not only are you an inveterate liar, you can't make up consistent lies.

The natives, bumiputera, lord over the lands that kafir pendatang imported by the pommies were dumped on. If you, as a kafir pendatang, don't like it, then sod off back to your homelands. Btw, tiongkok or ceca virus are NOT members of ASEAN, just so that you know.

Now sod off back to your chink or ceca virus home turf.

Actually there are. They are in your OIC.

Actually there is not. Not a single one calls them by such a stupid name, unlike Christ-ians.

John tan's fake prophet was a pedophile, slave trafficker, bandit, cheated on his wives, engaged in incest by marrying his first cousin.

You are not talking about a fake prophet of a religion that promotes penetrating your tender arse at a tender age for the purpose of salvation that your fake religion with fake scriptures promotes and that thanks to your ang moh kia pastors and priests you have come to love and adore?

Those are precisely the characteristics of the who's who, all the movers and shakers, of european nobiity and papal aristocracy and christendom that you have described above. Good now that you have learned to look at a mirror.

After Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) died, your first Caliph, Abu Bakar (RA), sent his brotherly Umar (RA), to beat up Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)'s daughter and her husband, and burn down their home for not accepting him as the new caliph.

Wonder how many times were your arse penetrated for you to come up with another one of your fantasies a.k.a lies without any basis? The proficiency with which you churn out lies is incredible although disgustingly so.

What is the source of your information for this fantasy? Certainly, nothing in the Quran attests to this and nothing in the Hadiths either, even if we were to believe in the fantasy that Hadiths compiled 200 years afterwards contained no errors or inaccuracies. Nowhere did Allah (SWT) promise that Hadiths will never be manipulated or corrupted, and true to expectations, many of them have been corrupted.

Unchanged and unaltered remains the Holy Quran as it was promised by Allah (SWT) in the Holy Quran.

None of these fantasies of yours, as expected, are backed by any historical sources. All of them are - and have to be - concocted fantasies of yours since there is no other way the only true religion, the greatest religion ever, that is Islam, can be maligned.

I don't think Abu Bakr (RA) was happy about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) marrying his daughter, but he was smart enough to keep his mouth shut, and bid his time for revenge against the house of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

You can't think in the first place and all you do is fabricate lies after lies consistently, endlessly, without any historical sources or facts to back them up, knowing fully well that is the only recourse the kuffar - including you - who like to take it up the arse from your ang moh kia priests and pastors have for trying to save "face".

Otherwise, your religion which has already been proven false and a paedophile religion that has ended up ruining your posterior - not posterity, just to be very very clear and certain - thanks to the greed and lust of your ang moh kia priests and pastors who your parents entrusted you to for "grooming" would become more of a laughing stock.

Naturally, the question would arise what sort of a perverted religion would need to lie endlessly, ceaselessly and fabricate stories without any historical basis to try to paint Islam in a negative light, to cast aspersions on the only true religion and the only valid religion on Earth?

It has to be a diabolical religion that promotes faggotry pinkdotsg and penetrating your tender arse at a tender age as a matter of religious rite all for the sake of satisfying the beastly desires of your "much beloved" ang moh kia priests and pastors.

 

[mudhatter]

You are right, in jiuhu being a malay = muslim.

The orang asli are constantly enticed with 'benefits' to convert, even the chinks are also enticed.

Malays are the orang asli.

Orang asli is a malay phrase meaning original people.

Melayu are natives of asean, and malaya.

Although it is true Melayun or Indon have never been Muslims, and Indon today are visibly less Islamic than Melayu, we can all read Ibn Battuta's descriptions to understand how these lots were historically, it remains true that today Melayu are more visibly Islamic than Indon. That's the only positive I can think of for the Melayun.

Chinks or ah neh kafir pendatang are not desired in Malaysia incl stinkypura. Together these kafir pendatang number close to 13 to 14 million, which is about the same as the number of jiuhu Melayu all over Malaysia+ brunei +stinkypura. Unless Malaysia import Indon Muslims (who are weaker than Melayu, usually, in Islamic belief) or at least more Bangla Paki Afghan CECA Muslims (many bangla or CECA are indeed black and therefore dirty and low IQ, expected from blacks or ceca niggers incl you), then this is indeed an uphill battle for Melayu.

it's better for Malaun to import more Muslims from more Islamic countries where ppl are more firm steadfast in their Islamic beliefs and upbringing and not soft weak willed and from a country with no civilization culture or history or intellect to begin with (such as ASEAN countries, or CECA virus which was ruled by Muslims for 1000 years showing how CECA have long been inferior or from tiongkok where mao wiped out everything in cultural revolution basically resetting their entire system)


this is a necessity and a compulsion. i agree with melayu on this thing, this one thing, at least.

 

[Loofydralb]

islam is truly a cult, a totally nonsensical religion.

Like I said. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Your religion eats your god's flesh and drink his blood. What is that? Cannibalism? Because they sacrificed their god on a cross. Pagans and polytheists.

Cat-alcoholic is truly a cult, a totally nonsense religion.

 

[syed putra]

Freedom of faith is the foundation for those who believe.
Jesus, mahomet, moses did not embrace religion, but warned the masses about religion. Idol worship.
Those who embraced religion were pharoah, the jews, arabs in mecca....quraish, ......

 

[duluxe]

Freedom of faith is the foundation for those who believe.
Jesus, mahomet, moses did not embrace religion, but warned the masses about religion. Idol worship.
Those who embraced religion were pharoah, the jews, arabs in mecca....quraish, ......

You are talking nonsense, no such thing being a muslim, you are controlled by faith of what you can eat, dress, who are your friends, etc. Islam is the only religion with many religious enemies.

 

[mudhatter]

You are talking nonsense, no such thing being a muslim, you are controlled by faith of what you can eat, dress, who are your friends, etc. Islam is the only religion with many religious enemies.

??

i understand you are 76 IQ CECA virus sore about 1000 year rule over your ancestors by your Muslim masters

why aren't you sore about 200 year rule by pommies over your ancestors? just because they first created and then gifted you an entirely artificial entity called "India" which had never existed before the Brits and for which there exists no documented history or record or artefact?


moreover these statements don't make much sense either since they are contradictory to begin with.

 

[Loofydralb]

You sure?

After your mahomet died from poisoning, his father-in-law from the child bride, abu bakr, got his goons to beat up the other muhammedan elders and get them to vote for him in their elections.

After that, abu bakr proceeded to lead armies of moslems to kill arabs who left islam after mahomet died. It's obvious that islam is a like a cult. Once you join, you're forbidden to leave, and other moslems are allowed by islam to use violence to stop other moslems from leaving islam.

islam is truly a cult, a totally nonsensical religion.

You are making up fairy tales just like what Paul did after Jesus went away. Prove it.

 

[JohnTan]

You are making up fairy tales just like what Paul did after Jesus went away.

You must talking about your fake prophet, mahomet. Didn't he make up a prophecy to allow him to marry his first cousin, zaynab? The pre-islamic arabs were against incest marriages. So mahomet made up a prophecy claiming that God allowed him to marry zaynab, paving the way for future moslems to marry their first cousins and legally engage in incest.

Prove it.

You really are very ignorant of your mohammedan religion. Or just in denial because you are deeply ashamed of islam's origins.


The account is narrated on the authority of Salman (d. c. 32/653), a close companion of both the prophet and Ali. In the final standoff, according to this account, Fatima refused the mob entry into the house, after which an enraged Umar ignored Fatima's pleas and set the door on fire, pushing his way into the house. Upon Fatima's resistance, the account describes that Umar physically assaulted her with a sheathed sword. The mob soon overpowered Ali and dragged him away, striking Fatima again as she tried to prevent it. The account states that Fatima still carried the bruises from this raid when she died soon after.[52][53]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Fatima's_house


You didn't read about the 'Ridda Wars' ?

The wars started very soon after mahomet died of poisoning. Many of the arabs were 'moslems' as a sign of personal allegiance or submission to mahomet. That allegiance did not transfer automatically to the next leader. That was what being 'moslem' meant to arabs.

So the new caliph, abu bakr, fought and killed many of those arabs who wished to leave islam peacefully and do their own thing.

The rebellious Arabian tribes declared that their pact with Muhammad was of personal nature and that they felt no obligation to serve the new empire; they refused to submit their collection of the zakat (alms payable by all Muslims with certain financial standing) to Medina. These people were branded as apostates, and Abu Bakr soon called a Jihad (holy war – contextually) against them to bring the region to order. The socio-economic and political motives of the Ridda Wars can be summarised as follows:

https://www.worldhistory.org/Ridda_Wars/

 

[mudhatter]

You must talking about your fake prophet, mahomet. Didn't he make up a prophecy to allow him to marry his first cousin, zaynab? The pre-islamic arabs were against incest marriages. So mahomet made up a prophecy claiming that God allowed him to marry zaynab, paving the way for future moslems to marry their first cousins and legally engage in incest.



You really are very ignorant of your mohammedan religion. Or just in denial because you are deeply ashamed of islam's origins.


The account is narrated on the authority of Salman (d. c. 32/653), a close companion of both the prophet and Ali. In the final standoff, according to this account, Fatima refused the mob entry into the house, after which an enraged Umar ignored Fatima's pleas and set the door on fire, pushing his way into the house. Upon Fatima's resistance, the account describes that Umar physically assaulted her with a sheathed sword. The mob soon overpowered Ali and dragged him away, striking Fatima again as she tried to prevent it. The account states that Fatima still carried the bruises from this raid when she died soon after.[52][53]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Fatima's_house

Apparently, you just made it up.

Attack on Fatimas house​

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Jump to navigationJump to search

Look for Attack on Fatimas house on one of Wikipedia's sister projects: Wiktionary (dictionary) Wikibooks (textbooks) Wikiquote (quotations) Wikisource (library) Wikiversity (learning resources) Commons (media) Wikivoyage (travel guide) Wikinews (news source) Wikidata (linked database) Wikispecies (species directory) Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Attack on Fatimas house in Wikipediato check for alternative titles or spellings. You need to log in or create an account to create this page. Search for "Attack on Fatimas house" in existing articles. Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title.

If your religion is false and promotes faggotry and penetration of children's rear at their tender ages, the only recourse left might be to malign the only true religion in the vain hope that some numskull or unsuspecting chink or slanty might fall for this trick and be ready to offer their arse on a platter to the next ang moh faggot eager to penetrated a chink slanty child's arse at his "confession" session!

How disgusting is that?

Apart from monkeypox and other diseases, from a moral standpoint, it's a revolting thought.

What sort of a perverted religion would promote that and resort to fabricated stories in order to try and falsely salvage some sort of respect for their fake religion?

Anybody with double digit IQ or higher would ditch such fake manmade "religions" immediately and opt for the only true religion that remains.

 

[JohnTan]

Apparently, you just made it up.

Attack on Fatimas house​

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Jump to navigationJump to search

Look for Attack on Fatimas house on one of Wikipedia's sister projects: Wiktionary (dictionary) Wikibooks (textbooks) Wikiquote (quotations) Wikisource (library) Wikiversity (learning resources) Commons (media) Wikivoyage (travel guide) Wikinews (news source) Wikidata (linked database) Wikispecies (species directory) Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Attack on Fatimas house in Wikipediato check for alternative titles or spellings. You need to log in or create an account to create this page. Search for "Attack on Fatimas house" in existing articles. Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title.

If your religion is false and promotes faggotry and penetration of children's rear at their tender ages, the only recourse left might be to malign the only true religion in the vain hope that some numskull or unsuspecting chink or slanty might fall for this trick and be ready to offer their arse on a platter to the next ang moh faggot eager to penetrated a chink slanty child's arse at his "confession" session!

How disgusting is that?

Apart from monkeypox and other diseases, from a moral standpoint, it's a revolting thought.

What sort of a perverted religion would promote that and resort to fabricated stories in order to try and falsely salvage some sort of respect for their fake religion?

Anybody with double digit IQ or higher would ditch such fake manmade "religions" immediately and opt for the only true religion that remains.

click again.

 

[JohnTan]

Like I said. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

You seem to enjoy throwing stones.

Your religion eats your god's flesh and drink his blood. What is that? Cannibalism? Because they sacrificed their god on a cross. Pagans and polytheists.

Where where? I gotta check with my pastor again. I'm sure the Holy Communion we consumed was bread wafer and ribenna. I would have preferred real red wine, but my pastor said kids were around, so we had to drink ribenna as substitute for wine.

You're always welcome to join us for Communion.

 

[mudhatter]

You didn't read about the 'Ridda Wars' ?

The wars started very soon after mahomet died of poisoning. Many of the arabs were 'moslems' as a sign of personal allegiance or submission to mahomet. That allegiance did not transfer automatically to the next leader. That was what being 'moslem' meant to arabs.

So the new caliph, abu bakr, fought and killed many of those arabs who wished to leave islam peacefully and do their own thing.

The rebellious Arabian tribes declared that their pact with Muhammad was of personal nature and that they felt no obligation to serve the new empire; they refused to submit their collection of the zakat (alms payable by all Muslims with certain financial standing) to Medina. These people were branded as apostates, and Abu Bakr soon called a Jihad (holy war – contextually) against them to bring the region to order. The socio-economic and political motives of the Ridda Wars can be summarised as follows:

https://www.worldhistory.org/Ridda_Wars/

So you now just made things up and after that has been exposed, you added these bits.

Those kuffar who breached their treaty were obviously in violation of the terms of the treaty and in line with the treaty were dealt with justly and swiftly. That seems to be perfectly fine and reasonable.

Yu mean if you sign a contract with pap-piglets saying you would pay them back a certain sum, say $5k SGD a month as repayment for a loan that they had approved, then what? Can you just go back on your word, renege on the contract, abandon it and stop paying for it and spend the loaned amount any way you want? WTF?

Who the hell allows that?

PAP-piglets would allow you to do that?

Let me know if your pap-piglets or your ang moh kia faggot priests and pastors who you love utmost even if they've deflowered your tender arse and continued to violate it repeatedly would ever allow yu to get away with it. If they do, ask them to lend you a billion SGD at least.

 

[Loofydralb]

You must talking about your fake prophet, mahomet. Didn't he make up a prophecy to allow him to marry his first cousin, zaynab? The pre-islamic arabs were against incest marriages. So mahomet made up a prophecy claiming that God allowed him to marry zaynab, paving the way for future moslems to marry their first cousins and legally engage in incest.



You really are very ignorant of your mohammedan religion. Or just in denial because you are deeply ashamed of islam's origins.


The account is narrated on the authority of Salman (d. c. 32/653), a close companion of both the prophet and Ali. In the final standoff, according to this account, Fatima refused the mob entry into the house, after which an enraged Umar ignored Fatima's pleas and set the door on fire, pushing his way into the house. Upon Fatima's resistance, the account describes that Umar physically assaulted her with a sheathed sword. The mob soon overpowered Ali and dragged him away, striking Fatima again as she tried to prevent it. The account states that Fatima still carried the bruises from this raid when she died soon after.[52][53]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Fatima's_house


You didn't read about the 'Ridda Wars' ?

The wars started very soon after mahomet died of poisoning. Many of the arabs were 'moslems' as a sign of personal allegiance or submission to mahomet. That allegiance did not transfer automatically to the next leader. That was what being 'moslem' meant to arabs.

So the new caliph, abu bakr, fought and killed many of those arabs who wished to leave islam peacefully and do their own thing.

The rebellious Arabian tribes declared that their pact with Muhammad was of personal nature and that they felt no obligation to serve the new empire; they refused to submit their collection of the zakat (alms payable by all Muslims with certain financial standing) to Medina. These people were branded as apostates, and Abu Bakr soon called a Jihad (holy war – contextually) against them to bring the region to order. The socio-economic and political motives of the Ridda Wars can be summarised as follows:

https://www.worldhistory.org/Ridda_Wars/

Who is Salman? You are using Shia narrations which have been roundly proven inauthentic.
It's like trying to prove that god is three and god is one.

 

[syed putra]

You are talking nonsense, no such thing being a muslim, you are controlled by faith of what you can eat, dress, who are your friends, etc. Islam is the only religion with many religious enemies.

Muslim serve their religion. So do christians, but not so enthusiastically like in the old days.
The arabs were liberstors agsinst harsh roman enslavement. But those days are long gone.

 

[Loofydralb]

Where where? I gotta check with my pastor again. I'm sure the Holy Communion we consumed was bread wafer and ribenna. I would have preferred real red wine, but my pastor said kids were around, so we had to drink ribenna as substitute for wine.

You're always welcome to join us for Communion.

Where? It's in the bible John 6:51 to 58 and Jesus says it's a literal eating and drinking of his blood!
And why you need to ask your pastor? Your religion is like an army full of regiment and straightjacket idiotic rules.
Did Jesus tell you to drink ribena? Then why you drink it, Jesus never told you to do that.
That's why Muslims say this verses is a forgery because it is completely nonsensical.

Why would I want to join you singing, dancing, eating, drinking? Jesus never did that when he worshipped the father.
He prostated and puts his forehead on the ground!!

 

[JohnTan]

Where? It's in the bible John 6:51 to 58 and Jesus says it's a literal eating and drinking of his blood!

You're welcome to read if his disciples literally ate his flesh or drank his blood.

Who is Salman? You are using Shia narrations which have been roundly proven inauthentic.

That's your problem with the Shia. Sort it out with them then. I doubt they find your sonni narrations to be authentic.

Your religion is like an army full of regiment and straightjacket idiotic rules.

Your own mahomet found his islamic rules full of straightjacket idiotic rules.

That's why he didn't obey his own islamic laws on not marrying more than 4 wives.

 

[JohnTan]

Those kuffar who breached their treaty were obviously in violation of the terms of the treaty and in line with the treaty were dealt with justly and swiftly.

Leaving the muhammedan religion is a breach in treaty?

Yu mean if you sign a contract with pap-piglets saying you would pay them back a certain sum, say $5k SGD a month as repayment for a loan that they had approved,

In your islam, your 'repayment' is for life, unlike a bank loan.

Your analogy doesn't even make sense, and has no relation to abu bakr massacring people and threatening them with death if they do not return to islam.

 

[mudhatter]

Leaving the muhammedan religion is a breach in treaty?



In your islam, your 'repayment' is for life, unlike a bank loan.

Your analogy doesn't even make sense, and has no relation to abu bakr massacring people and threatening them with death if they do not return to islam.

There is no such religion in the first place.

Given your penchant for taking it up the arse, it's understandable why you don't think anybody would ever like to lead a morally upright lifestyle. This might explain a thing or two about how many times your arse was penetrated by your ang moh kia priests and pastors.

The analogy makes perfect sense for those with high enough IQ. If someone does not adhere to the terms of the treaty, they will have to be dealt with accordingly. Nothing complicated about that for most people with high enough IQ.

If you want, you may ask PAP-piglets to lend you a billion SGD and see if you can extract anything out of them in the first place. You can forget about violating any terms of any contract with your pap-piglets who, just like you, are a bunch of eunuchs.

 

[Loofydralb]

You're welcome to read if his disciples literally ate his flesh or drank his blood.

Looks like you do not know your fellow christians. Some of them readily admit eating the literal flesh and blood of christ.

That's your problem with the Shia. Sort it out with them then. I doubt they find your sonni narrations to be authentic.

The Shia are not Islam's problem. We view Shias and Catholic in the same way.
Shia worship Ali, Fatima, Hassan and Hussein.
Cat-alcoholic worship Paul, Mary Jesus, saints, and believe the Poke represents god's word.
These 2 will have plenty of time to comfort each other in Jahanam.

Your own mahomet found his islamic rules full of straightjacket idiotic rules.

That's why he didn't obey his own islamic laws on not marrying more than 4 wives.

Yes rules like circumcision, no pork, no alcohol, no gambling. Same rules ALL the previous prophets followed but surprisingly you bible doesn't say a single thing about gambling. So the rules you are following is not from god.

Marrying more wives is only limited to prophets. Like Moses, Solomon etc.
The rest of us are reminded in the Quran to stick to one is we cannot be just. Does your bible say how many you can marry? No. That means you are free to marry 9 like all chinese towkays have mistress.