What are the forum's view?
Did India denied that their troops are remained across the border over almost 2 months on the Chinese side with tents and bulldozer?
Did India claimed any legal or justified reasons for that?
The Chinese said that location is one that has no dispute over the position of border line, hence the Indian troops are not an area which their govt claimed to own, and they are aware that Chinese warned them to withdraw back to their own side repeatedly. No claims from India that they "were just staying within their own territory" what so ever. Is that correct?
Did India denied that their troops are remained across the border over almost 2 months on the Chinese side with tents and bulldozer?
Did India claimed any legal or justified reasons for that?
The Chinese said that location is one that has no dispute over the position of border line, hence the Indian troops are not an area which their govt claimed to own, and they are aware that Chinese warned them to withdraw back to their own side repeatedly. No claims from India that they "were just staying within their own territory" what so ever. Is that correct?