We already about know the problems. Boss job is to find a solution.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious Ah Loong - Coming Global Crises Will Shock Sinkies!
- Thread starter Pinkieslut
- Start date
Daft Sinkies need to understand that the problem cannot also be the solution. Loong story short: he backed the wrong horse.
How about reliving and enjoying all the PAP election manifestos during Loong's reign?
PAP Manifesto 2006
PAP Manifesto 2011
PAP Manifesto 2015
PAP Manifesto 2020
---
Edit: some turd had actually flagged and removed the 2020 PAP manifesto file that was uploaded a couple of years ago. Original post in 2021.
Whoever you are, I hope your entire family dies... painfully.
BONUS:
Population White Paper v1
Population White Paper v2
You should pray ah loong GEHow about reliving and enjoying all the PAP election manifestos during Loong's reign?
PAP Manifesto 2006
PAP Manifesto 2011
PAP Manifesto 2015
PAP Manifesto 2020
---
Edit: some turd had actually flagged and removed the 2020 PAP manifesto file that was uploaded a couple of years ago. Original post in 2021.
Whoever you are, I hope your entire family dies... painfully.
BONUS:
Population White Paper v1
Population White Paper v2
vote PaP in the next erection
As well as ejaculation.
vote for the Pee and Poo? Scare tactics?
Yes, vote PAP as long as LHL is PM
Singaporeans are on their own, like LKY staid, they deserve the Gov they voted for.
Actually their main solution has been simple-lower cost by bringing in "cheaper" foreign talents to improve "productivity" and supress wages .
For locals, its more and more training for jobs for the future (with no time frame when it will ever be created or given to locals ).
The same fella was broadcasting we are short of IT talents when thousands of IT people were being retrenched overseas
For locals, its more and more training for jobs for the future (with no time frame when it will ever be created or given to locals ).
The same fella was broadcasting we are short of IT talents when thousands of IT people were being retrenched overseas
Do you think Singapore have many elite talents job positions availability for Singaporean? Obviously not with such a small land mass country that keep hoping more foreign investors. Moreover so much people aiming at PMET opening. So that's why cost of living keep going up while your boss not willing to pay you more. This is life.
Population must keep increasing so that we can bring in more $$$$¥¥¥¥€€€€€ from all corner of world de Woh
Must think "Inclusive" mah
Coming soon...
He has been lock up Singapore males for 15 years of NSF liability....
First 2 years is full time, then 13 year of reservist.... this is 1.5 decade of our life time.... sad.... then bring in FTs with no such NSF liability.... bastard...
According to WEF founder Klaus Schwab, The Great Reset agenda is the best chance to instigate stakeholder capitalism using the following three main components:[6]
Steering markets toward fairer outcomes: This part of The Great Reset aims to encourage governments to change wealth taxes, withdraw fossil-fuel subsidies, and adopt new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition to promote a stakeholder economy.[6]
Ensure that investments advance shared goals: This part of The Great Reset aims to encourage governments and private entities to spend recovery funds on goals like equality and sustainability.
Schwab argued, "Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run.
This means, for example, building 'green' urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics."[6]
Harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good: Schwab argued that the cooperation among companies, universities, and others to respond to COVID-19 should continue to address other health and social challenges.[6]
Steering markets toward fairer outcomes: This part of The Great Reset aims to encourage governments to change wealth taxes, withdraw fossil-fuel subsidies, and adopt new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition to promote a stakeholder economy.[6]
Ensure that investments advance shared goals: This part of The Great Reset aims to encourage governments and private entities to spend recovery funds on goals like equality and sustainability.
Schwab argued, "Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run.
This means, for example, building 'green' urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics."[6]
Harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good: Schwab argued that the cooperation among companies, universities, and others to respond to COVID-19 should continue to address other health and social challenges.[6]
Support for The Great Reset
According to an article commissioned by SOMPO Holdings, a Japanese insurance company, in response to The Great Reset, COVID-19 revealed a need for economic change. The article says, "We need a new capitalism that increases consumer demand for goods and services that contribute to the SDGs, and that rewards companies meeting that “good demand” with economic returns. In addition, capital markets should factor in forecasts for long-term profits generated by corporate actions in line with ESG, even if those actions do not deliver short-term returns."[7]
Heather Johnson, vice president for sustainability and corporate responsibility at Ericsson, wrote that The Great Reset provides an opportunity to make sure "companies take a holistic view of their role" and that it "has become much clearer that the role of a company to simply be profitable and serve stakeholders has evolved; there’s now an expectation that companies should make a positive impact in society."[8]
According to an article commissioned by SOMPO Holdings, a Japanese insurance company, in response to The Great Reset, COVID-19 revealed a need for economic change. The article says, "We need a new capitalism that increases consumer demand for goods and services that contribute to the SDGs, and that rewards companies meeting that “good demand” with economic returns. In addition, capital markets should factor in forecasts for long-term profits generated by corporate actions in line with ESG, even if those actions do not deliver short-term returns."[7]
Heather Johnson, vice president for sustainability and corporate responsibility at Ericsson, wrote that The Great Reset provides an opportunity to make sure "companies take a holistic view of their role" and that it "has become much clearer that the role of a company to simply be profitable and serve stakeholders has evolved; there’s now an expectation that companies should make a positive impact in society."[8]
Opposition to The Great Reset
Professor C Raja Mohan summarized critiques of The Great Reset in the following way: "The right sees the WEF arguments about restructuring the global economy as a dangerous attempt to impose 'socialism’ and dismantle the traditional society, or what remains of it. The left scoffs at the Davos Man’s talk on the crisis of capitalism. It points to the complicity of the Davos forum in promoting policies that have brought the world to the current impasse and question its capacity to produce solutions."[9]
The Great Reset "has turned into a viral conspiracy theory purporting to expose something no one ever attempted to hide, most of which is not really happening anyway, some of which actually should," according to The Intercept senior correspondent Naomi Klein.[10] Klein added, "like the WEF’s earlier big themes, the Great Reset is not a serious effort to actually solve the crises it describes. On the contrary, it is an attempt to create a plausible impression that the huge winners in this system are on the verge of voluntarily setting greed aside to get serious about solving the raging crises that are radically destabilizing our world."[10]
Broadcaster Tucker Carlson wrote an op-ed for Fox News criticizing ideas WEF founder Klaus Schwab published about The Great Reset before the conference in the following way: "What changes is Schwab talking about? We don't know. What we're certain of is that you're going to pay for them and the people in charge will benefit from them."[11]
Professor C Raja Mohan summarized critiques of The Great Reset in the following way: "The right sees the WEF arguments about restructuring the global economy as a dangerous attempt to impose 'socialism’ and dismantle the traditional society, or what remains of it. The left scoffs at the Davos Man’s talk on the crisis of capitalism. It points to the complicity of the Davos forum in promoting policies that have brought the world to the current impasse and question its capacity to produce solutions."[9]
The Great Reset "has turned into a viral conspiracy theory purporting to expose something no one ever attempted to hide, most of which is not really happening anyway, some of which actually should," according to The Intercept senior correspondent Naomi Klein.[10] Klein added, "like the WEF’s earlier big themes, the Great Reset is not a serious effort to actually solve the crises it describes. On the contrary, it is an attempt to create a plausible impression that the huge winners in this system are on the verge of voluntarily setting greed aside to get serious about solving the raging crises that are radically destabilizing our world."[10]
Broadcaster Tucker Carlson wrote an op-ed for Fox News criticizing ideas WEF founder Klaus Schwab published about The Great Reset before the conference in the following way: "What changes is Schwab talking about? We don't know. What we're certain of is that you're going to pay for them and the people in charge will benefit from them."[11]
