• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

6.9 million: policy or planning parameter?

watchman8

Alfrescian
Loyal
Haha, I thought many ministers said the 6.9 million is only a planning parameter. How come they are seeking parliament approval for this 6.9mil "policy". So nowadays we can regard any government policy as guideline only?:*:

Or the ministers are all lying about planning parameter? Which one huh?:*:

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/hd--pap-mp-moves-to-drop-%E2%80%98policy%E2%80%99-from-population-motion-054411492.html
Holland-Bukit Timah Member of Parliament Liang Eng Hwa on Tuesday sought to strike the word “policy” off from a motion asking Parliament to give its nod to a controversial population white paper.

Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean filed a motion on Monday asking that the House endorse the white paper “as the population policy roadmap to address Singapore’s demographic challenge, and (the Land Use Plan) as the land use plan to support Singapore’s future population”.

The phrase “population policy” should first be removed, argued Liang, and further elaboration should be provided to clarify the government’s focus on boosting Singapore’s core citizen population, carefully moderating immigration rates and maintaining that the projections are to facilitate infrastructure and land use planning.

Liang also said the motion should specify first that it will be more a roadmap than the exact policy, and second, that the figures indicated are projections, with further emphasis on maintaining a strong Singaporean core.
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Just to share with you how good is their fucked up performance. If you look at the 2001-2011, 1% labor increase only generates 1.8% increase in GDP, all things being equal. So you can see how useless cheap labor is. Productivity would have been different. But LKY hates smart skilled people. He purposely refused to invest in it for the past 4 decades. All the talk about R&D and high tech is just snake oil charm.
 
Top