• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

1 billion in alleged fraud case (Former: Fat boy screwed her of S$48 million)

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Over 420 investors in Envy fraud scheme may have to return $119.7m in investment gains​

The 424 investors had invested in a dodgy $1.2 billion nickel trading scheme involving businessman Ng Yu Zhi (right).


The 424 investors had invested in a dodgy $1.2 billion nickel trading scheme involving businessman Ng Yu Zhi (right).
graceleong.png

Grace Leong
Senior Business Correspondent

Jul 8, 2021

SINGAPORE - Hundreds of investors who reaped $119.7 million in so-called profits from fraudulent nickel investments with Envy Global Trading (EGT) may have to return the money to the company, according to court documents seen by The Straits Times.
The 424 investors had invested in a dodgy $1.2 billion nickel trading scheme involving big-spending businessman Ng Yu Zhi, former managing director of trading companies EGT and Envy Asset Management (EAM).
The possibility that they may have to return their gains arose after KPMG, the High Court-appointed interim judicial manager for Ng's companies, found that "there was no purchase or sale of physical nickel for the purported nickel trading".
"Hence, there were no investment returns," it added.
KPMG noted that any returns paid to investors could not have come from the sale and purchase of actual nickel.
"The source of such payments could only be the funds paid in by investors," it said in a report.

The interim judicial manager, represented by Shook Lin & Bok partner David Chan, noted: "The investment scheme sold to investors was built on non-existent physical metals trades, fraudulently created documents and the promise of generous returns on investments."
The July 2 report prepared by a team led by KPMG partner Bob Yap stated: "It is our view that any amounts paid out to investors as referral fees or amounts withdrawn beyond the principal invested should be returned to the companies."
Mr Yap added that some investors have agreed in principle to do so.
The KPMG team's bid to claw back funds is part of efforts to meet creditors' claims against Ng's companies.
These creditors include 522 investors who had lost $841.5 million, of which more than half is alleged to have gone to Ng.
The tracing of fund flows is ongoing, but KPMG has estimated net outflows of about $475 million to Ng from his Envy group of companies, including transactions that were not recorded in company bank records.
Ng led a lavish lifestyle with personal monthly expenses of around $2 million, including for private jet flights, butler and chauffeur services, alcohol, expenditure at nightclubs and upmarket restaurants, and expenses associated with multiple luxury cars and "significant monetary gifts to his close associates".
A $5.4 million payment was also allegedly made to Ng's "family in China", according to court papers. Some $100 million worth of his assets seized by the Commercial Affairs Department included a rare multimillion-dollar Pagani Huayra Italian supercar - the only one in Singapore - and a Porsche 911 GT3, according to earlier ST reports.
ST understands that other assets include jewellery, watches, artwork and high-end bags like the Hermes Birkin.
Some of the $841.5 million of investor funds was also alleged to have gone to Ng's associates, including nearly $22 million to Ms Lee Si Ye, deputy managing director of the Envy companies. Around $43.6 million in commissions and profit-sharing payments went to employees and $24 million in referral fees were allegedly paid to investors for bringing in other investors, the interim judicial manager found.
About $64.5 million of outflows is yet to be verified.
The KPMG team said legal proceedings, including claims against Ng and Ms Lee for all liabilities incurred by the Envy companies in relation to the nickel trading scheme, will begin after the High Court rules on whether the firms should be put into liquidation. A hearing on the winding up application is scheduled for Aug 16.
The interim judicial manager wants the companies to be wound up as "none of the purposes of a judicial management can be achieved".
This is because the Envy companies' nickel trading is "non-existent; there is no other meaningful business undertaken by them and their assets are grossly insufficient to meet the potential claims of their creditors".
Further, they found that various papers such as contracts, trading statements and shipping documents contained a number of irregularities. "Documents presented in support of the purported nickel trading were forgeries," they said.
EAM is said to have borrowed money from investors to buy nickel, but it is accused of never having bought any metal.
EGT is alleged to have deceived investors into buying a portion of receivables from its purported sale of nickel through forward contracts when there were no such contracts.
The investment contracts with EAM and EGT were for an investment period of three months.
Investors were promised varying returns that averaged 15 per cent. Many investors rolled over their contracts after the end of three months to reinvest their principal and returns, noted reports.
Ng, 34, who was removed as managing director of EGT, faces 31 charges, most of them alleging cheating that took place between September last year and February this year. Other charges include fraudulent trading, forgery and criminal breach of trust involving at least $201.2 million.
The alleged victims named in the charges include Temasek International general counsel Pek Siok Lan, criminal lawyer Sunil Sudheesan and former Law Society president Thio Shen Yi.
Ms Pek was allegedly cheated of $5.5 million, Mr Sunil of $1 million and Mr Thio of $87,000.
Ng's bail on Monday was increased to $4 million from $1.5 million after police uncovered a plot to help him flee the country by land or sea.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Diamonds, nickel - and S$1.46b of failed promises


Diamonds, nickel - and S$1.46b of failed promises​

16 Jul 2021
Angela Tan
Singaporean businessman Ng Yu Zhi who was charged with fraud and cheating in one of Singapore's largest suspected investment fraud schemes led a lavish lifestyle that perpetuated his image of a successful trader.
Late last year, Coco Cai, a 30-year old socialite, was photographed for a luxury magazine, draped in her newly acquired baubles from luxury brand Bvlgari's Barocko jewellery collection.

As a valued client of the Italian jeweller, she was getting an exclusive private viewing of a curated collection, presented to her in her home, since a shopping trip to Italy was out of the question during the pandemic.

Among her purchases was the Cupola necklace, featuring a 32.88-carat sugarloaf cabochon Colombian emerald, framed by a mosaic of platinum, diamonds and more emeralds.

This was another addition to her family's trove of high-end collectibles, which included Chinese ink and water-colour paintings, pop-art sculptures and Louis Vuitton trunks.

But that world threatens to crumble for the Fujian native. In February, her husband, 34-year old Ng Yu Zhi, was arrested. The following month, he was charged with fraud and cheating in one of Singapore's largest suspected investment fraud schemes.

Between 2016 and this year, the heavy-set, bespectacled Singaporean is suspected to have duped close to 1,000 investors into parting with S$1.46 billion for what they thought was going into the trading of nickel.

The metal is a critical mineral in lithium-ion batteries, a key component in the fast-growing electric vehicle market; nickel prices hit a seven-year high recently.

Prosecutors and court-appointed judicial managers, led by KPMG's Bob Yap (partner, head of restructuring and of Asia-Pacific deal advisory), said that while investors had received payments of around S$700 million, they are still owed another S$840 million, based on the face value of outstanding contracts.

Some of the monies were allegedly siphoned into Ng's personal account (S$474 million), and into the account of Lee Si Ye, a deputy managing director of Envy group of companies (S$22 million); S$44 million went to other employees as commissions and profit sharing; S$24 million was paid to investors as referral fees; and about S$120 million went to investors as withdrawn profits.

Investigations are ongoing, but so far, more than S$100 million in bank accounts and properties belonging to various entities connected to Ng have been confiscated by the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD).

The CAD has confirmed that it was not their intent to forfeit assets if there are persons legally entitled to them.

Over several virtual townhall meetings with investors, KPMG's Mr Yap said the interim judicial managers were looking into clawing back the monies, including referral fees, commissions, profit sharing paid and profits withdrawn by investors.

Ng, whose bail has been raised from S$1.5 million to S$4 million, ran Envy Asset Management (EAM) and Envy Global Trading (EGT). As they were not fund-management companies, they were not licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

However, in March last year, EAM was put on the MAS' investor-alert list to flag the firm's unlicensed status.

Still, investors poured in money. The companies were eventually brought to the attention of the CAD last November.

What gave Ng away were the large transfers of funds from corporate accounts to personal accounts, which triggered thousands of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) from banks to the police.

Convincing story

Ng led a lavish lifestyle that perpetuated his image of a successful trader. He was charming with women, and known for his friendships with Singapore's business elites, even as he carried out an alleged Ponzi scheme - an investment fraud structure which pays investors with money from new clients rather than actual profits.

The interim judicial managers at KPMG said 424 investors received some profits.

With personal expenses to the tune of S$2 million a month, Ng splurged on travel by private jet, a butler, a chauffeur, alcohol, expenditure at nightclubs, fine-dining restaurants, hotel rooms, multiple luxury cars and significant monetary gifts to close associates.

According to a close family source, his butler was paid S$30,000 a month, more than what many senior executives here earn.

But he was no ordinary help. He ran Ng's households and his many relationships. To the women, Ng was generous and gifted Hermes Birkin bags (each retailing at US$9,000 and up).

Ng loved his cars, and had 40 of them, including Singapore's only Pagani Huayra, a supercar he bought second-hand for more than S$7 million.

The gull-winged Italian hyper beast was stored in a clean room, under precisely controlled environmental conditions. His other marques included Rolls Royce, Aston Martin, Lamborghini, Ferrari and Porsche.

Despite his conspicuous spending, Ng had a positive public image. He became an increasingly visible figure in Singapore's philanthropic community, and was honoured by the prestigious Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine at the National University of Singapore for his contribution to a fund-raising drive.

The accountancy graduate did not own any real estate. His three-storey bungalow in Bukit Timah, one of Singapore's most desirable residential addresses, was rented - as were most of the homes for his female friends.

There was one exception - a penthouse in Orchard Road, which was bought under a trust.

An option to buy a good-class bungalow was scuttled when the authorities swooped in and his accounts were frozen.

From his office on the 19th floor of Centennial Tower in Singapore's central business district, Ng allegedly targeted victims, promising them average quarterly returns of 15 per cent - an eye-popping 60 per cent or more in annual gain.

This is considerable, given that large hedge funds tracked by Citco had the highest weighted average return of 23 per cent the whole of last year, and smaller funds a weighted average return of 3.3 per cent.

Investors thought their money went into buying physical nickel from Poseidon Nickel Limited, an Australian-listed company, at a discount; the metal was then thought to be sold at a profit to either BNP Paribas or Raffemet.

They would then profit from the sale of nickel to BNP or Raffemet, less the logistics charges and commissions.

The only problem was there were no real nickel trades. The ultimate beneficial interest in the Envy Group was held mostly by Ng.

The other ultimate beneficial owner was Ms Lee.

To convince investors of the existence of the purported nickel trading, he is alleged to have forged documents; shipping documents appeared to be printouts of scanned documents.

Other irregularities included a "Citibank" logo on a document that is inconsistent with Citibank's official logo.

Ng even went to the extent of recording a video showing investors a group of people, including himself, inspecting a shipment of nickel purchased from Raffemet.

But this purchase cannot be traced to any investment agreement.

Unaudited accounts and star-power allure

What is particularly shocking about Ng's scheme was that his alleged victims were not your typical mom-and- pop investors or retirees. He allegedly hoodwinked high-net-worth individuals and some of Singapore's most prominent names in the investment and legal fields.

Alleged victims included Temasek International general counsel Pek Siok Lan, criminal lawyer Sunil Sudheesan, former Law Society president Thio Shen Yi and founder of Vickers Venture Partners Finian Tan, known for spotting the potential in search giant Baidu back in 2000, when it was just a small Chinese start-up.

Ms Pek was allegedly cheated of S$5.5 million, Mr Sunil of S$1 million, Mr Thio of more than S$500,000, and Mr Tan of US$19.2 million (S$25.8 million).

Ng also allegedly cheated Envysion Wealth Management, a Singaporean fund-management company, and its founder Veronica Shim Wai Han, of at least S$48 million.

The interest of Mr Tan, a former Asia-Pacific head at Goldman Sach's oil unit, J. Aron, and Ms Shim, an ex-Singapore Airlines flight stewardess-turned-private banker of almost 20 years' standing, arguably helped lend legitimacy to Ng's scheme.

Kerry Goh, an investment professional who is now chief executive of multifamily office Kamet Capital, said it was important to be wary of funds and companies which court investments by mentioning big names.

"'So-and-so invests in our fund'. You have to watch out for that sort of name-dropping," he said.

"If you're not conducting your own due diligence and want to rely on the famous name as an investor, you have to at least find out who did the due diligence."

Moreover, Ng's companies were not even audited. One investment banker said: "All the investors needed to ask was: 'Who are your auditors?'"

He added that at the most fundamental level, investors could have done "a simple Google search", and in Envy's case, searched Poseidon.

"That would have alerted them as there was no offtake of nickel," he said.

In a statement through the Australian Securities Exchange, Poseidon said it has no business relationship or sales agreements with Ng and the Envy entities.

The names and initials of the Poseidon director who supposedly signed off on the contracts of June 27, 2016 and October 20, 2017, did not match the name of any of the directors listed in Poseidon Nickel's annual reports for the fiscal years 2016 and 2017.

Further checks would show the BNP statements purportedly issued by BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Ltd as the buyer were dated after BNP Paribas Commodity Futures was closed and no longer authorised to conduct regulated business.

David Gerald, founder, president and chief executive of the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), advised investors to do the simple "smell test": If the headline returns are high relative to the risk-free rate, be suspicious, sceptical and walk away.

"Practise the 'Ask, Check and Confirm' routine. Ask as many questions as you need to understand what's being offered, and how the returns are to be generated.

"Then check and double-check the credentials of the proposer or seller and whether it is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and go back and confirm everything again and again."

That may still not be enough. Said one affected investor: "If the documents are fabricated, or if there's deliberate fraud, short of conducting forensic due diligence, there's only so much an individual can do to verify that the transaction is legitimate."
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Why the Greedy Gullibility of Temasek’s General Counsel Should Ring Alarm Bells​

KJEYARETNAM
14DAC839-E1C8-42F9-86CF-9B64FF8B0C22
A7913D22-FBBF-4747-ABCC-3C111A8E52A8
Yesterday I read the astonishing news that Temasek’s General Counsel, Pek Siok Lan, had apparently blown $5.5 m in a fraudulent nickel trading scam.

This immediately raises several concerns. First how did one of the most senior members of Temasek’s management fall victim to a scam that should have rung alarm bells in even the most unsophisticated retail investor’s mind? The alleged fraudster, Ng Yu Zhi, was promising investors guaranteed returns of 15% over a three month period, a staggering return when global interest rates are close to zero. A sophisticated fraudster like Bernie Madoff did not promise 15% returns but lured investors in with consistent supposed high single-digit yields but with low volatility. So this grifter was hooking greedy rich people with money burning a hole in their pockets with the most brazen of lies.The old adage that if an investment return is too good to be true, then it generally isn’t, proven to be true time and time again, does not seem to have percolated the brain of Ms Pek when even a school kid should have seen the con. Fools, soon, parting and money are words that spring to mind.

This leads to my second concern. As General Counsel at Temasek, Ms Pek plays a central role in compliance and due diligence checks.She would presumably be responsible for checking that investments by Temasek were above aboard and satisfied legal requirements and probably a central role in due diligence and risk. To quote Price Waterhouse UK:

In-house legal teams no longer simply provide advice, manage risk and ensure legal compliance. Today’s General Counsel (GC) is expected to help guide the business through times of change and meet commercial objectives, operating as a business enabler and an essential adviser to the board.

If Ms Pek was so gullible and indifferent to her own money, and so willing to be ensnared by a shady scheme that was undoubtedly marketed on the basis that it took advantage of legal or regulatory “arbitrage” (a euphemism for law breaking), what does that say about her ability to act as a steward of the nation’s reserves? How blasé was she in signing off on unwise and dubious investments by Temasek? It would be interesting to know if Ms Pek was alone or whether she or another Temasek board member brought other members of senior management in our sovereign wealth fund into the scam. If Ms Pek could so easily fall victim to an industrial scale scam involving her own money in amounts that most ordinary Singaporeans will have trouble comprehending then she is not a fit and proper person to be General Counsel and should be removed.

Secondly, what does this say about how our reserves are being managed? The Government keeps saying it has no money, the reserves have been depleted by the pandemic and need to be rebuilt and that taxes (which means regressive taxes on the poor like GST and not taxes on the privileged and politically connected like Ms Pek) need to go up. Yet I have calculated that, based on the size of the Net Investment Returns Contribution and the way the Constitution mandates how it is calculated, that the reserves should be at least $2.6 trillion and that does not even include the value of the land the Government owns (80% of Singapore). I have previously, on multiple occasions over several years going back to at least 2012, (see links below) voiced serious concerns that a large part of the reserves may have been lost through fraud, mismanagement or corruption. The fact that Ms Pek could so easily lose such a large sum (though maybe not to her), and not even through an investment loss but through the most basic of frauds, should ring alarm bells about the true state of our reserves.

Thirdly, this is yet another demonstration of SIngapore’s fake “meritocracy”, which operates from the top down, with the Prime Minister as head of the Government appointing his wife to be head of Temasek despite mediocre qualifications and little evidence of ability outside the public sector, which in Singapore is the family business. People of Ms Pek’s star quality, undoubtedly selected on the basis of who they are related or married to or the colour of their skin and their loyalty to the ruling family rather than their ability, fill up the top ranks of not only Temasek but also GIC, MAS and every Government-linked company and statutory board. In addition to the egregious and undeserved appointment of Ho Ching, which made the current Governor of the Bank of England, my old friend from university Andfrew Bailey guffaw when I described it, I have written previously about Josephine Teo and her husband and the amazing ability of these members of the political elite to always land on their feet even when they are found out to be at the centre of the most shocking conflicts of interest.

Finally the fact that Ms Pek had so much money to invest that she was able without thinking twice to give $5.5 million to an out-and-out fraudster is a strong indication that the stories about Ho Ching pocketing $100 million a year are probably true. Presumably Ms Pek only “invested” a small portion of her liquid wealth to Mr Ng and had so much money burning a hole in her pocket that she was in a hurry to give it away. She is only General Counsel and on Temasek’s management chart is only in the fifth row, far below the gods in the first row (Ho Ching, Dilhan Pillay, Lee Theng Kiat and Chia Song Hwee). The website does not even mention her qualifications, which is a strong indication that they are mediocre, and merely states that she has 25 years legal experience, most recently at ST Telemedia, a Temasek-owned company. She does not even appear to be a former Government scholar though given the quality of the other scholars, it would not be surprising if she was. Like Ho Ching, her whole career appears to have been spent in the public sector.

Singaporeans’ minds may boggle at the audacity and huge scale of the fraud that Ng is alleged to have perpetrated and the number of rich idiots he has ensnared. However the real confidence trick is the way SIngaporeans tolerate a small elite of mediocre and unintelligent people, who insult us with their claims to be selected on the basis of mediocrity, are able to help themselves to obscenely outsize amounts of money out of public funds, while insulting us with their hypocritical claims that they are living lives of noble sacrifice. It is a wonder that they are able to refrain from laughing at you as they greedily pocket billions of dollars. Animal Farm is alive and well in Singapore.
 

nayr69sg

Super Moderator
Staff member
SuperMod
How much does Pek Siok Lian earn to be able to blow away $5.5m in investments? I am sure $5.5m is not her entire life savings
 

nayr69sg

Super Moderator
Staff member
SuperMod
All these financial people. Yes they dabble with large sums of money betting on stocks and this and that and make more money. And get paid big bucks for it.

But really how does that contribute to society and the world?

It is almost poetic that the filthy rich got scammed by the filthy rich.

Poor people like me that Ng guy would not have wasted his time talking to me.

I so want to have one of those extinction level events destroy the entire world monetary system and reset the fucking world.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How much does Pek Siok Lian earn to be able to blow away $5.5m in investments? I am sure $5.5m is not her entire life savings

The staggering amount the legal counsel earns in Temasek is staggering. Even a partner in a law firm may not earn that much.
The rumours about Ho Ching's compensation is $100 million - there is no smoke without fire.
A fresh graduate who joins Temasek is reportedly paid $9,000 per month.
Why? Because there is a salary scale and HR has to fit these fresh graduates into the salary scale, regardless of experience or what the market rate is.
 
Last edited:

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

How Ng Yu Zhi allegedly perpetrated the billion-dollar Envy 'nickel trading scheme'​

July 20,2021
GRACE LEONG
SENIOR BUSINESS CORRESPONDENT

SINGAPORE - A massive investment fraud scheme that allegedly ensnared high-profile investors such as the chairman of Vickers Capital Group Finian Tan and even notable names in Singapore's legal fraternity has stunned many - given the calibre of the investors involved and the amounts they lost.
Ng Yu Zhi, 34, a little known businessman until four months ago, is accused of having swindled investors into putting at least $1.2 billion into non-existent nickel deals - making his the first-ever investment fraud case here to hit the billion-dollar range.
The former managing director of trading companies Envy Global Trading (EGT) and Envy Asset Management (EAM), Ng faces 31 charges to date, most of them alleging cheating that took place between September last year and February this year. Other charges include fraudulent trading, forgery and criminal breach of trust involving at least $201.2 million.
Vickers' Mr Tan was allegedly cheated of US$19.2 million. Other alleged victims include Temasek International general counsel Pek Siok Lan, criminal lawyer Sunil Sudheesan and former Law Society president Thio Shen Yi. Ms Pek was allegedly cheated of $5.5 million, Mr Sunil of $1 million and Mr Thio of $87,000.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore had brought EAM and EGT to the attention of the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) in November 2020. Following the CAD's probe into the two firms' activities, Ng was arrested on 16 February 2021 for suspected cheating. Ng's bail on July 6 was increased to $4 million from $1.5 million after police uncovered a plot to help him flee the country by land or sea.
But how did the scheme work, how did Ng get so many to believe him and where did the money go? The following account is based on court documents seen by The Straits Times.

How the scheme worked​

rk_nickel-ore_190721.jpg


Ng's scheme revolved around the purported trading of Nickel. Nickel is used in a wide range of electronics, including in the manufacture of batteries for electric cars. PHOTO: REUTERS
According to the interim judicial managers, EAM or EGT would buy nickel from Poseidon Nickel Ltd, a company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange, at a discount. EAM or EGT would then sell the nickel at a higher price to either BNP Paribas Commodity Futures or a firm called Raffemet Pte Ltd.
The investors would enter into agreements with Ng's companies, EAM or EGT, to fund the purported purchase of physical nickel from Poseidon. EAM and EGT would transfer the investors' funds to Envy Asset Management Trading Limited ("EAMT"), a British Virgin Islands company wholly owned by Ng. EAMT would make payment to Poseidon on behalf of EAM/EGT and also receive sale proceeds from BNP and/or Raffemet on behalf of the two companies.
The model was supposed to work like this:
rk_chart1_190721.jpg

PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS

The investment returns would then be the profits from the sale of nickel to BNP or Raffemet.
Investors were promised returns that averaged 15 per cent, over an investment period of three months. Many investors rolled over their contracts after the end of three months to reinvest their principal and returns.
In reality, the purported nickel trading was non-existent and the documents presented in support of the purported nickel trading were forgeries, the judicial managers found. They found that aggregate payments of $238.6 million made by EGT to a purported EAMT account, actually went to two Singapore bank accounts owned by Ng.
The actual trading model looked like the one below, said the interim judicial managers.
rk_chart2_190721.jpg
PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS

What Ng did to make it look convincing​

rk_office_190721.jpg


The office of Envy Global Trading in Centennial Tower, taken in February. PHOTO: REUTERS

Much was done to convince investors of the existence of the purported nickel trading. This included forging documents - and recording a video that showed Ng and Ms Lee Si Ye, deputy managing director of the Envy companies, inspecting a shipment of nickel in a Singapore warehouse.
Apart from being lured by the promise of generous returns, many investors were also attracted by the fact that a number of prominent investors were investing in the scheme.
The interim judicial managers also found a slew of irregularities in Envy's documents.

1. Buying nickel allegedly for a video to convince investors​

Among the irregularities alleged, Envy Global Trading bought nickel from Raffemet and then sold the same quantities back to Raffemet shortly after a video recording of the purchase was shown to investors.
The following tables show the transactions that took place between July and September 2020 after Ng allegedly requested that nickel be procured "to show to investors".
rk_tables_190721.jpg


PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS
The interim judicial managers said this nickel was "unrelated to the investors' investments" as it "did not involve the purchase of nickel from Poseidon."
"Instead, it appears that the nickel shipment was procured from Raffemet to be shown to investors and resold to Raffemet after this was done," they said.

2. Inconsistencies in company names on contracts​

The report from the interim judicial managers also found inconsistencies in Poseidon's name in contracts purporting to sell nickel to Envy. The Poseidon contracts record "Poseidon Nickel Limited" as the contractual counterparty. But, in certain other contracts, the signing pages record "Nickel Poseidon Ltd" as the signing entity.
In the snippet of a Poseidon contract below, the name is rendered one way at the start.
rk_highlighted-screenshot-1_190721.jpg
PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS
Then later in the same document, the name is changed.
rk_highlighted-screenshot-2_190721.jpg
PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS
Other irregularities included identical imperfections and illegible areas (red arrows below) in the signatures of both Poseidon's signatories in the Poseidon contracts signed on 1 April 2019, 1 July 2019 and 1 October 2019.
rk_annotated-screenshot_190721.jpg


PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS

3. Doing business with a defunct entity​

BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Limited was no longer authorised to conduct regulated business as of February 4, 2019, and was closed on March 15, 2019.
This UK Companies House's records of BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Limited obtained by the IJMs shows that the company closed on that date.
highlighted_screenshot_3.jpg
PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS
Yet strangely, nine BNP Statements purportedly issued by BNP Paribas Commodity Futures have a date after February 4, 2019. And all of the receivables purchase agreements in April 2020 had BNP terms appended that record BNP Paribas Commodity Futures as the buyer.
This BNP statement, one of several the IJMs obtained from Envy employees, is dated some nine months after the company closed, on Dec 31, 2019.
rk_highlighted-screenshot-4_190721.jpg


PHOTO: SCREENGRAB OF COURT DOCUMENTS
As of May 25, 2021, BNP has not responded to the IJMs' requests for confirmation of any business ties with EAM or EGT.

Where did the money go?​

The tracing of fund flows is ongoing, but KPMG has estimated net outflows of about $475 million to Ng from his Envy group of companies, including transactions that were not recorded in company bank records.
Ng led a lavish lifestyle with personal monthly expenses of around $2 million, including for private jet flights, butler and chauffeur services, alcohol, expenditure at nightclubs and upmarket restaurants, and expenses associated with multiple luxury cars and "significant monetary gifts to his close associates".
A $5.4 million payment was also allegedly made to Ng's "family in China", according to court papers.
Some $100 million worth of his assets seized by the Commercial Affairs Department included a rare multimillion-dollar Pagani Huayra Italian supercar - the only one in Singapore - and a Porsche 911 GT3, according to earlier ST reports.
rk_pagani-huayra_190721.jpg
The Pagani Huayra supercar owned by businessman Ng Yu Zhi. PHOTO: ENVY MOTORS/FACEBOOK
ST understands that other assets include jewellery, watches, artwork and high-end bags like Hermes' Birkin.
Some of the $841.5 million of investor funds was also alleged to have gone to Ng's associates, including nearly $22 million to Ms Lee.
424 investors also reaped $119.7 million in so-called profits from the bogus nickel investments with Envy Global Trading, and may be asked to return the monies.
Around $43.6 million in commissions and profit-sharing payments went to employees and $24 million in referral fees were allegedly paid to investors for bringing in other investors, the interim judicial manager found.
About $64.5 million of outflows is yet to be verified.

What now?​

The KPMG team said legal proceedings, including claims against Ng and Ms Lee for all liabilities incurred by the Envy companies in relation to the nickel trading scheme, will begin after the High Court rules on whether the firms should be put into liquidation.
A hearing on the winding up application is scheduled for Aug 16.
The interim judicial manager wants the companies to be wound up as "none of the purposes of a judicial management can be achieved".
This is because the Envy companies' nickel trading is "non-existent; there is no other meaningful business undertaken by them and their assets are grossly insufficient to meet the potential claims of their creditors".
 

SalahParking

Alfrescian
Loyal
looks like all futures contract trading. no exchange for physical. the 3 month rollover is the telltale sign of papaer trading. Nickel was in contango and the 15 percent was realistic. These pap porlumpars were greedy and they knew what they going into but got cold feet when the futures market turned south.
 

no_faith

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If there is such opportunity i also do it
Its about the billions
Those goons you dont con them
They got conned by another :biggrin:
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Ng

Ng
Photographer: Juliana Tan for Bloomberg Businessweek

Businessweek - The Big Take

The Billion-Dollar Nickel-Swap Scandal That Shocked Singapore​

Singaporeans invested a billion dollars in Ng Yu Zhi’s nickel-trading company. He’s accused of taking the money and skipping the nickel.
By Matthew Campbell and Chanyaporn Chanjaroen
February 11, 2022

Not long after the novel coronavirus arrived in Singapore, forcing the hyperconnected city-state to shut its borders for the first time, a rumor circulated among its many wealthy people—and among others who weren’t so well-off. A little-known investment manager was apparently delivering an astonishing 15% quarterly profit to anyone who invested with him, by trading nickel.

As word spread, more and more Singaporeans clamored to give their money to the investment manager, a 34-year-old ex-accountant named Ng Yu Zhi. Soon Ng’s fund, Envy Group, had raised almost S$1.5 billion ($1.1 billion) from hundreds of clients. He certainly seemed to be making good on the hype, returning steady gains quarter after quarter and giving every appearance of great success, with a mansion in one of Asia’s most expensive neighborhoods, a 126-foot yacht, and a fleet of luxury cars.

Trusting Ng would prove to be catastrophic. Singapore police arrested him last February and accused him of running perhaps the largest scam, in terms of dollars lost, in the small country’s history. According to police and forensic accountants appointed to examine Ng’s books, the trades he claimed to be making had simply never occurred. Instead, they say, he was engaged in an elaborate fraud, transferring S$475 million of investors’ money to himself and using it to enjoy a lifestyle that was lavish even by the standards of the setting for Crazy Rich Asians. Ng has yet to enter a plea in response to the 75 charges against him, and he declined to provide a comment for this story, citing ongoing police investigations.

relates to The Billion-Dollar Nickel-Swap Scandal That Shocked Singapore

Featured in Bloomberg Businessweek, Feb. 14, 2022. Subscribe now.
Source: DEEPOL/plainpicture

His clients included some of Singapore’s most successful citizens: senior lawyers, former bank executives, and businesspeople who should have known better than to invest in what appears, in retrospect, to have been a Ponzi scheme, and not a particularly sophisticated one. They weren’t the only people who failed to ask enough questions. According to legal filings, Ng made more than a thousand transfers from Envy’s corporate and investor funds to bank accounts he likely controlled, misappropriating hundreds of millions of dollars before being stopped.

Investment scams occur all over the world and can last far longer than Envy survived; Bernie Madoff ran a giant Ponzi scheme under the noses of investors and regulators for decades. Still, the allegations against Ng are awkward for Singapore, which is navigating a sensitive national transition. With its stable politics, relatively open borders, and respected legal system, the city is closer than ever to displacing Hong Kong as Asia’s main financial center, a development that would turbocharge its already robust economy. Yet despite Singapore’s orderly reputation, it’s seen more than its share of high-profile scandals in recent years, including the collapse of Noble Group Ltd., a commodity trading company accused of cooking its books, and an alleged fraud at Hyflux Ltd., a water utility that entered a court-mandated debt restructuring in 2018, infuriating retail investors.

To some in the city, the apparent ease with which Ng operated suggests that its authorities need to keep a closer eye on the rising tide of cash that’s sloshing in. “I absolutely think Singapore needs to step up its enforcement and oversight of white-collar crime,” says Mak Yuen Teen, a professor of accounting at the National University of Singapore Business School. In the Envy case, “there were many red flags indicating possible fraud. So we have to ask, ‘Where were the circuit breakers?’ ”

relates to The Billion-Dollar Nickel-Swap Scandal That Shocked Singapore

Ng incorporated Envy Group in 2015 and decided to focus on nickel.
Photographer: Juliana Tan for Bloomberg Businessweek

Until a few years ago, little about Ng would have marked him as bound for the world of high finance. Soft-spoken and unfailingly polite, with a round, full face, he studied accounting at one of Singapore’s public universities then joined audit firm KPMG LLP. One of the main clients he worked with was BHP Group, the world’s largest mining company, and Ng found that he was fascinated by the metals business, with its huge, liquid markets, real-world industrial needs, and 24/7 volatility. He began trading commodities on the side, and in 2015 he left KPMG to develop his interest into a full-time career.

It was a fortuitous moment to start a trading company. Global commodity prices had declined by roughly half from their 2008 peak, offering the potential for huge profits to anyone with the courage and capital to ride them back up. And there were few better places to do it than Singapore. Always a busy regional hub, the city was emerging as a global financial contender, attracting investments not only from other parts of Southeast Asia but increasingly from India, China, and beyond. Everyone seemed to want a piece of its success. Over the next several years, billionaires including Ray Dalio and Sergey Brin would open local offices to invest their personal wealth; British vacuum-cleaner tycoon James Dyson also set up one and spent a reported S$74 million on a five-bedroom downtown penthouse.

Ng incorporated Envy Group in 2015, taking its name from a slightly cringey line KPMG used in its training sessions: that the company’s goal was to be “the envy” of other accounting providers. He decided to focus on nickel, which was an unusual strategy for a small commodities outfit. The trade was dominated by a handful of well-connected operators, making it challenging to build a business from scratch. But Ng saw nickel as seriously undervalued, with markets failing to price in its growing utility: It’s so crucial to rechargeable batteries that Tesla Inc. co-founder Elon Musk once asked suppliers to “please mine more.”

Business was excellent, as far as anyone outside of Envy could tell. Nickel prices went on a bull run for most of the second half of the 2010s, and Ng steadily expanded his client list, sometimes with help from Veronica Shim, a successful wealth manager who was impressed enough by Ng that she invested with him herself and offered Envy’s trades to her own clients.

Singapore is a flashy place. On Orchard Road, the main shopping drag, chauffeur-driven Bentleys pull up outside flagship stores for the likes of Harry Winston and Dolce & Gabbana; at the waterfront Marina Bay Sands casino, high rollers can wager millions before retiring to a 6,400-square-foot “Chairman Suite” on the 53rd floor. But even in a city where the rich delight in showing off their success, Ng stood out. Envy operated from a luxuriously appointed office, arranged around a fully stocked bar from which visitors might be offered a glass of 21-year-old Hibiki whisky, a Japanese treasure that can sell for more than S$200 per pour. Ng liked to meet clients and colleagues at top-drawer sushi restaurants, roaring between engagements in vehicles from a fleet that included a Ferrari, a Lamborghini, and Singapore’s only Pagani Huayra supercar, which he’d spent more than S$7 million to buy.

relates to The Billion-Dollar Nickel-Swap Scandal That Shocked Singapore

Cai on the cover of Prestige.

His home life was no less luxurious. Ng and his Chinese-born wife, Coco Cai, rented a mansion near the lush Botanic Gardens, and he was in the process of buying two others. The pandemic hardly dented their lifestyle. In December 2020, she told Prestige, an Asian society magazine, how a team of salespeople from Italian jewelry brand Bulgari had come to their home to present a “curated selection” of new pieces “flown in specially for her.” Cai bought four.

Ng did little marketing, but news of the outsize returns he was delivering to investors was spreading, discussed at birthday parties and on golf courses or passed between yacht owners at the Sentosa Cove marina, where Singapore’s super rich keep their vessels. In turn, more and more members of the city’s financial elite sought to entrust him with their money. From Pek Siok Lan, the general counsel of state investment company Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd., came S$5.6 million. Arun Murthy, former global head of commodities at Standard Chartered Plc, put in a little less than S$1 million. Finian Tan, one of Singapore’s most prominent venture capitalists, was a major backer; he and partners invested a total of S$26 million.

Few, if any, were perturbed by a March 2020 decision by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the nation’s main market watchdog, to place Envy on its “investor alert list,” which flags companies that may be “wrongly perceived as being licensed or regulated by MAS,” and thus appear to be safer. One Envy investor, who asked not to be identified discussing his loss, says it didn’t seem like a major concern: Dozens of funds are placed on the list each year. Nor did it stop hundreds of less wealthy investors, including restaurateurs and doctors, small-business owners and retirees, from giving Ng their money, swelling the total handed over to Envy to almost S$1.5 billion by early 2021. In a city where so many people seemed to be finding ways to get rich, why shouldn’t they?

Put simply, Envy had almost never bought any of the nickel it claimed to be trading

The tropical sun was barely over the horizon when a team of officers from the Commercial Affairs Department, the antifraud unit of the Singapore Police Force, arrived at Ng’s mansion last Feb. 16. He was already up, preparing to send his daughter to school. The officers let him shower and change before taking him to gather documents from Envy’s office and then to a police station.

It turned out Ng had been on investigators’ radar for at least several months. The MAS had received tips about Envy’s operations in mid-2020 and referred the matter to the police later that year. Once Ng was in custody, officers held him for more than two days, questioning him at length about Envy’s operations. After his release, according to people familiar with the matter who asked to remain anonymous in order to describe private conversations, Ng told staff and investors that his detention was the result of a misunderstanding—one that might result, at most, in a slap on the wrist for Envy. Many believed him, one of the people says. Ng appeared more relaxed about the police’s interest in Envy than most of his employees, giving every impression he had little to worry about.

That outward calm was shattered on March 22, when prosecutors filed their first criminal charges against Ng, accusing him of channeling S$300 million of investor money to his own accounts. (Subsequent legal filings pushed the alleged total to just under a half-billion Singapore dollars.) The charges outlined the broad strokes of what police and, later, a team of court-appointed accountants from Ng’s alma mater, KPMG, concluded was an audacious but simple fraud. Put simply, Envy had almost never bought any of the nickel it claimed to be trading, and the returns investors thought they were receiving were in fact drawn from new clients’ deposits—a classic Ponzi structure. Indeed, Poseidon Nickel Ltd., the Australian mining concern that Ng told investors he was sourcing the metal from, informed KPMG auditors that it had “no business relationship” with Envy and had never entered any transaction with it.

When they looked over Envy’s purported contracts with Poseidon, the accountants, led by Bob Yap, one of Singapore’s best-known restructuring specialists, noticed what they dryly described in an update for the court as “numerous irregularities” in the documents. For one thing, the name of a “director” whose signature appeared on two contracts on behalf of the Australian company did “not appear to match the initials or names of any of Poseidon’s directors in the relevant period.”

Meanwhile, according to the auditors, investor money was being moved in tranches of S$200,000 to accounts likely controlled by Ng, sometimes in dozens of wire transfers per day. Two of Singapore’s major banks, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. and United Overseas Bank Ltd., were concerned enough by Ng’s activities to close his accounts well before his arrest. Other lenders, including DBS Group Holdings Ltd. and HSBC Holdings Plc, filed suspicious-transaction reports with the authorities but continued doing business with him. DBS and HSBC declined to comment on Ng’s accounts; spokespeople for both lenders said that they have comprehensive systems for flagging suspicious transactions and cooperate fully with law enforcement. An MAS spokesperson said in a statement that the agency expects banks to “implement robust measures to monitor for suspicious transactions” and would take action against firms that fell short of regulatory requirements.

As they dug further, investigators concluded that everything about the nickel deals had been faked, and not especially well. In communications with investors, Envy had said it was selling cargoes to a trading operation called BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Ltd., a London-based unit of the French bank. But U.K. corporate records indicated that this entity had ceased operations in February 2019. Envy’s records nonetheless contained 11 trading statements from after that date—documents that would have to have been forged.

The investigation did find that Envy had conducted one genuine nickel deal. In July and August of 2020, the company spent S$42 million to buy more than 2,000 metric tons of the commodity from Raffemet Pte Ltd., a large trading house. Ng went to a local warehouse to inspect the load, with colleagues recording a video of him looking over loads of nickel pellets. Envy sent the video to its investors, then sold the nickel right back to Raffemet.

relates to The Billion-Dollar Nickel-Swap Scandal That Shocked Singapore

The cityscape at dusk.
Source: Anekoho/Agefoto

Ng is awaiting trial in somewhat more straitened conditions than he enjoyed before his arrest. Out on S$4 million bail—one of the largest in Singapore history—he’s swapped his mansion for a serviced apartment. After recent court hearings, he’s departed not in a souped-up sports car but an Audi sedan. He’ll soon face a difficult choice. If he opts to contest the charges against him, he could remain free for years, albeit without the ability to leave Singapore, as the case winds its way through the courts. If he pleads guilty, he’ll likely receive a lengthy sentence, though one that’s shorter than the 20-year maximum he’d probably face if convicted at trial.
The broader damage of Envy’s collapse is still being tallied. Several investors who asked not to be identified in order to avoid being publicly associated with Envy say they don’t expect to recover the bulk of what they lost. It’s not clear how much will be raised from ongoing sales of Ng’s assets, including cars, art, and jewelry. The same is true of a lawsuit filed against him by the KPMG auditors, who are seeking more than S$500 million in damages.

Whatever the ultimate financial cost, the Envy scandal will nudge along efforts to prevent fraud in Singapore as it becomes a more important global hub. Ravi Menon, managing director of the MAS, acknowledged not long before Ng’s arrest that detecting financial irregularities is “an area that needs to be addressed.” The national stock exchange recently expanded its enforcement mechanisms, making it mandatory for public companies to institute whistleblower policies and giving itself the power to require a director or executive to resign. Other proposals would give regulators more tools to ensure that accounting companies comply with anti-money-laundering regulations.

But even the most finely tuned regulatory systems can be frustrated by a sufficiently audacious swindler, especially one that’s in tune with the psychological needs of his marks. To win the confidence of so many sophisticated people, Ng appears to have grafted the timeless appeal of get-rich-quick schemes onto a more particular desire: to share in the spoils of a city rising faster than almost any other. Above all, Ng’s investors “trusted the individual,” says Chenthil Kumarasingam, a partner at the law firm Withers KhattarWong, who advises on white-collar crime but wasn’t involved in the Envy case. “He made a very good show of living a lifestyle that everybody aspired to.” —With Joyce Koh and Yoolim Lee
 

cocobobo

Alfrescian
Loyal
The staggering amount the legal counsel earns in Temasek is staggering. Even a partner in a law firm may not earn that much.
The rumours about Ho Ching's compensation is $100 million - there is no smoke without fire.
A fresh graduate who joins Temasek is reportedly paid $9,000 per month.
Why? Because there is a salary scale and HR has to fit these fresh graduates into the salary scale, regardless of experience or what the market rate is.
Nah... they are masterchefs.... what is salary scale to them? Can structure infinite ways
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
It’s been 5.5 months since I left and the malicious dogs cottonmouth aka glockman aka Jeremy Quek as per hint by jw5 (and sweetiepie etc) are allowed by Leongsam to smear and insult me slut whore mistress with no consequence. I have to inform Leongsam to delete the posts and sometimes to no avail and i am sick of it. So Leongsam did not follow his deal to get his moderators to remove posts speaking ill of me so here I am carrying out my vow to spam the forum if cottonmouth is allowed to spam in my threads without consequence - which cottonmouth obviously did and was allowed - and he has been allowed in this 5.5 months no need follow his agreement to stop insulting me and continued to smear and insult me whore just yesterday and insulted me have std one day before that and everyday with no consequence.

Another thing to highlight is I realised after I left forum that @strawberry = @kaninabuchaojibye and I already know @nightsafari = @kaninabuchaojibye i.e despicable nightsafari is the strawberry that started the thread Who is Ginfreely sugar daddy and then keep upping it on the pretext of asking about strawberry. No wonder so pretentious always pretending to like my Hokkien threads while stabbing me non stop.
 
Top