-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Can we vote for prime minister instead of president
- Thread starter †††††
- Start date
can....but his name must be Tan KuKu
Full name : Tan Ku Ku. Angmo mia: Bird.
Just need to challenge him in AMK. If I remember correctly, you cannot be a cabinet minister unless you are a MP. So if LHL loses in a constituency, he will have to step down.
There's no such thing as "the" western system, just as there's no such thing as an Asian system or values. US voters vote for President then he decides who are the ministers (secretaries of departments). The regionally representative congressmen are voted for separately. UK voters vote for their constituency MPs and the party with majority decides who are their PM and ministers from the MPs. The town councillors are voted for seperately. Singapore being so small, many of these are merged or modified or even taken advantage of for gerrymandering purposes.
My view is that SG don't have the basic ingredients for western-level democracy - educated citizens, free press, rights protected by constitution and a diverse economy.
What is the point of democracy when you have a mainly state-owned economy structure? It will only hamper the efficiency of the system when you have opposition.
The amount of dissent will be reduced when the 3rd generation Singaporeans pass away. They are left out due to a lack of education/opportunities. The current generation is well aware that they are responsible for their own life and there will be no help when they fuck up their lives.
What is the point of democracy when you have a mainly state-owned economy structure? It will only hamper the efficiency of the system when you have opposition.
The amount of dissent will be reduced when the 3rd generation Singaporeans pass away. They are left out due to a lack of education/opportunities. The current generation is well aware that they are responsible for their own life and there will be no help when they fuck up their lives.
Anything also can lah, and not just limited to a single way as well.
One of them being to take PAP out of the parliament and then re-write whole constitution, then hold referendum to pass it.
Other ways including do a strong action alike Yellow Shirts and Red Shirts of Thailand. Can also, who say can not? Military Coupe also can remove Thaksin. Who say can not?:p
One of them being to take PAP out of the parliament and then re-write whole constitution, then hold referendum to pass it.
Other ways including do a strong action alike Yellow Shirts and Red Shirts of Thailand. Can also, who say can not? Military Coupe also can remove Thaksin. Who say can not?:p
this is interesting.
last time I check, a cabinet minister must be a member of parliament ( MP, NCMP and NMP ) so it's possible to have a scenario where LHL lose in AMK GRC, return as NMP and be a cabinet minister but he won't have full voting rights as a MP. Can a NMP be prime minister, not sure?
it's morally impossible for a NCMP or NMP to be PM or cabinet minister but why can't they legislate these words in black and white - NCMP and NMP cannot be PM or minister.
SAF is under the command of who?
The paper generals are well paid and won't stray one lah!
If anything, Chinese understand greed and motivation more than any other races.
SAF is under the command of who?
The paper generals are well paid and won't stray one lah!
hahaha...papee very clever...
SAF is for show show only...
They make sure that CDF and Service Chiefs do not stay in the appt too long....maybe 4 years or less.
Uniquely sinkapore...
Perhaps the fact that people have not stepped foward to challenge LHL in AMK, or that the majority have not voted for opposition in AMK or in other wards, shows that most people are still satisfied with LHL and PAP.
If people were suffering, hungry and desperate all over SG, there would be strong challenges in AMK and opposition support all over SG. Am I right?
As for the point about mp becoming ministar, he can also be an ncmp, if he gets one of the highest % of losing votes. But I don't think he will be PM as an nmp or ncmp.
GCT won't allow it. Hahahahahahahahahaha.............................
Not forgetting a comfortable position for the top generals after they retire.
Which means that the possibility of a coup ever happening is practically zero.
SAF is under the command of who?
The paper generals are well paid and won't stray one lah!
If anything, Chinese understand greed and motivation more than any other races.
In Singapore SAF is peasant and peasant is SAF, in a political situation for the use of forces, generals regardless how they are paid or incompetent have nearly zero chance to reverse the men's political positions by order.
They will only flee or get shot dead trying to serve PAP.
You can be sure that PAP only put trusted dogs to be generals, but that is still far from this dream to use military orders or forces to achieve political goals, because only the reverse result will be there awaiting.
Military coups to gain power had been and still will be carried out by lower officers who have balls bigger than the generals. Colonel Gaddafi of Libya and Colonel Suharto from Indonesia for example. In Myanmar their generals had lost power to their own subordinates using softer coups. A major by a name I can not remember was well respected and very popular in Philippines during People's Power.
Chinese Mao was also a lower positioned officer initially in the CCP, and it was only during heavy losses ad serious defeats suffered by CCP under KMT troops attacks, and during which Mao's battle plan proposals was proven to be effective that he gained power. But what was his qualifications and trainings? He had no formal military background at all, not even BMT! He was just a librarian from Chang Sha library. Big time generals with big troops and formal trainings etc got defeated by strategies from a no body.
Real leadership emerged from unexpected places, Hitler was only an NCO in the German army! BGs in Singapore are not expected to perform anything other than blow-jobs. If forces are to be exercised politically in Singapore BGs are not able to prevent anything, neither side can really count on them, they will not be able to cause anything to happen nor preventing anything from happening.
there is also the mayor. don know do wat also.
hey dunch forget...we have half a dozen ministers in prime minister office - also dunno do what...
keep the PM company perhaps?
keep the PM company perhaps?
Similar threads
