Cancer in Salmon
http://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/item/493-surprise-you-re-eating-fukushima-radiation-bloody-cancerous-tumors-in-fish-seafood
The next time you hear anyone from 'government' say "We have no reason to believe there is any radiation hazard" bear in mind it is because they are not testing for it. That's why they have no information . . . . . and . . . . conveniently . . . . "no reason to believe" there is any danger.
Yet government did take -some- action with respect to radiation; they raised the definition of "safe" exposure! Yes, you read that correctly.
A nearly 1000-fold increase for exposure to strontium-90;
A 3000 to 100,000-fold hike for exposure to iodine-131; and
An almost 25,000 rise for exposure to radioactive nickel-63.
The new radiation guidelines would also allow long-term cleanup thresholds thousands of times more lax than anything EPA has ever judged safe in the past.
And see this.
Indeed, some government scientists and media shills are now “reexamining” old studies that show that radioactive substances like plutonium cause cancer to argue that they help prevent cancer.
It is not just bubbleheads like Ann Coulter saying this. Government scientists from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratories and pro-nuclear hacks like Lawrence Solomon are saying this.
In other words, this is a concerted propaganda campaign to cover up the severity of a major nuclear accident by raising acceptable levels of radiation and saying that a little radiation is good for us.
As of October 30, 2015, (yesterday) the Japan Times reported that the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has detected radiation at 9.4 Sieverts outside Reactor containment vessel #2. This amount of radiation is absolutely deadly to anyone exposed for 45 minutes. This latest development has scuttled TEPCO's plans to decommission what's left of that exploded reactor because no one can be near enough to it to disassemble the wreckage.
