• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Closer tabs on public figures' wealth: MAS

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
INDIVIDUALS who hold prominent public function roles, including heads of state and senior political party officials, may come under closer financial scrutiny as Singapore's central bank looks to tighten rules to tackle money laundering and terrorism financing.

Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) deputy managing director Ong Chong Tee said: "Singapore is fully committed to keeping our financial centre clean and supporting global efforts to combat financial crime."

Since the Sept 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, DC, the authorities around the world have worked to crack down on illegal movements of money.

The MAS yesterday released a consultation paper on the proposed amendments to its notices to financial institutions.

The proposed changes include a requirement for financial institutions to "cater for a risk-based approach for certain categories of politically exposed persons", said the MAS in a statement.

A "politically exposed person" is defined as a person entrusted with prominent public functions, which include the roles held by a head of state, government ministers, senior civil or public servants, or senior political party officials.

Other than conducting normal customer due diligence measures, financial institutions have to go one step further for such politically exposed people by, for example, checking their source of wealth.

Financial institutions must also carry out enhanced monitoring of the business relations with such clients as well as with their family members and close associates under the proposed amendments.

Another rule being proposed is that financial institutions must put in place additional requirements for cross-border wire transfers exceeding $1,500.

These would include performing customer due diligence on occasional transactions and minimum information fields in the message or payment instructions.

Not all cross-border transactions above $1,500 would be affected as financial institutions would normally already have the relevant information as part of their customer due diligence, such as when they establish business relations with their customers.

For the first time, card network providers such as American Express or Diners Club will also be issued with a new notice on the prevention of money laundering and terrorism financing.

MAS said in the consultation paper that such non-bank credit or charge card issuers are already subject to existing regulations and have established internal controls against money laundering and terrorism financing.

They have not been regulated for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing as MAS said they are less exposed to these risks compared with other financial sub-sectors here.

But MAS said they will now come under such regulations as "the card-issuing sub-sector as a whole is considered by international bodies to warrant closer scrutiny".

Other proposed amendments would see financial institutions perform money-laundering or terrorism-financing risk assessments at the wider institutional level.

This is on top of assessing such risks over individual customers.

Financial institutions will also have to formalise the need to screen customers and their connected parties.

Many of the proposals are already being done by financial institutions, according to MAS, which said "the proposed changes formalise existing supervisory expectations and practices of the financial institutions".

MAS said the new measures will further safeguard Singapore's financial system from being used to launder money or finance terrorism.

In an evaluation exercise conducted by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in 2008, Singapore was assessed to have a rigorous regime against money laundering and the financing of terrorism, Mr Ong said.

The FATF will conduct another evaluation of Singapore next year and Mr Ong said MAS aims to do as well in that exercise. The FATF is the global standard-setter for measures to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and the financing of proliferation.

Dr Lim Wee Kiak, a member of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Finance and Trade and Industry, said: "If there are more checks and balances, it is always better."

[email protected]

Background Story

AMONG THE PROPOSED CHANGES:

• Financial institutions need to cater for a risk-based approach for certain categories of politically exposed people.
• Financial institutions must put in place additional requirements for cross-border wire transfers exceeding $1,500.
• Financial institutions need to perform money-laundering or terrorism-financing risk assessment at the wider institutional level.

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.
 

greenies

Alfrescian
Loyal
How about having the similar "more checks and balances" in PAP government and agencies!

Dr Lim Wee Kiak, a member of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Finance and Trade and Industry, said: "If there are more checks and balances, it is always better."
 

greenies

Alfrescian
Loyal
The biggest crooks are the PAP bigwigs. If there's any auditing to be done, let's start with them.

Cannot understand why this clean PAP government dare not to declare assets of the political and high-office holders.
What are they afraid of, or hiding for?
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
In other word/ meaning.... "Fence sitter".

"Fence sitter" is someone who does not want to make a stand either way on an issue.

However, I take a stand on just about everything so there is no way I can be accused of sitting on a fence.

The PAP govt is not transparent. They can be extremely devious. It is full of flawed characters. However, that does not alter the fact that they are one of the best governments in the whole wide world.

A person can be both flawed and talented. Governments are no different.
 

greenies

Alfrescian
Loyal
Something like a politician saying I support your movement of blaming NLB for removing some books, but also I do not agree with the gay right. He can claim later that I am on your side whoever won.
 

greenies

Alfrescian
Loyal
A person can be both flawed and talented. Governments are no different.

Yes, absolutely.
But but there should have responsibility and accountability.
Someone caused lost of billion dollars public money, but not accountable for it.
How can we digest it?
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Yes, absolutely.
But but there should have responsibility and accountability.
Someone caused lost of billion dollars public money, but not accountable for it.
How can we digest it?

Who has lost billions of dollars of public money?
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Suzhou projects and 2008 bank crisis as samples.

Those are specific projects but that does not mean that there haven't been many other projects which reaped great returns. You have to look at the net gain/loss in order to pass judgement.
 
Top