• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PM Lee:individuals need to also take responsibility for the flood!!

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Connive

–verb (used without object), -nived, -niv·ing.

to avoid noticing something that one is expected to oppose or condemn; give aid to wrongdoing by forbearing to act or speak (usually fol. by at ): The policeman connived at traffic violations.

Yo, what's with the dictionary definitions? We are not illiterate. We know the meaning of all these words. Stop being a condescending piece of shit. U can look up condescending if you want to.
 

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When things are going well and doing well, they are quick to claim credit for it. When things are not going well and not doing well, they are quick to blame you for it. What do you call these people? Snake? Rats? Or just MIW?
 

Cerebral

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
Knn. They are a bunch of mother fuckers. Ask individuals to take responsibilities.

When BP has oil spill, do they ask everyone to be responsible? Obama called the Chairman and fucked him.
 

nickers9

Alfrescian
Loyal
Knn. They are a bunch of mother fuckers. Ask individuals to take responsibilities.

When BP has oil spill, do they ask everyone to be responsible? Obama called the Chairman and fucked him.

In USA, Obama find the main culprit(who handle the job) to take the blame and fuck him.

In Singapore, Lee Hsien Loong spread out the blame(from the main culprit who handle the job) to every Singaporeans here and make everyone looks like the culprit.

Truly Asia! Truly Singapore!

Singapore Boleh!!!
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
Scro,

Wait! Don't open the champagne yet! I believe that the MB was designed such that at the very highest level of water in the dam, it will still be lower than the levels upstream at Stamford canal. this is due to the ground gradient. so floodwaters shld still be able to run off seawards towards the dam, or in yr words, sucked outwards from the land.

In civil engineering projects, models are always built and tested before real construction begins. Quite something to think that it was not tested rigorously.




Here is an exclusive - the procedure kicks in when the tide is above a certain height. During the critical period of rainfall that caused the Orchard Rd flood, the tide was actually low. No one thought that opening the crest gates would have helped suck out the water from stamford canal despite its blockage.

What is even more interesting is that the Flood would not have occurred in the first place if the Barrage was not built. If the barrage was not built, due to the low tide, water would have been sucked out as the level at the canal mouth is much lower. This is not a king tide event. All, our previous floods occurred during King Tide. This was human error.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I see your point but I suspect that they actually raised the height close to stamford mouth as the Singapore river is very shallow especially at the mouth.

I called my contact again and she told me that no one had expected the blockage and it was not total blockage. If the water was sucked out of the bay via the pumps, the flow thru the canal would have increased and the blockage would have dislodged. The high level in the bay kept the blockage in place. She told me that King tide status has been in place for years and MB was designed with that in mind. As it was not king tide, the visual monitors were not activated.

I am waiting for the next seating of parliament.




Scro,

Wait! Don't open the champagne yet! I believe that the MB was designed such that at the very highest level of water in the dam, it will still be lower than the levels upstream at Stamford canal. this is due to the ground gradient. so floodwaters shld still be able to run off seawards towards the dam, or in yr words, sucked outwards from the land.

In civil engineering projects, models are always built and tested before real construction begins. Quite something to think that it was not tested rigorously.
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
If this was done, that blockage may not even be dislodged. It would have gone undiscovered perhaps till the next heavier prolonged downpour with a more disastrous effect then.

However, I still agree that the bloody blockage was just a convenient excuse because it was a smoking gun.

If the water was sucked out of the bay via the pumps, the flow thru the canal would have increased and the blockage would have dislodged. The high level in the bay kept the blockage in place.
 
Top