• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious The disaster of same sex marriage for Singapore:

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
The disaster of same sex marriage for Singapore:
HIGH HIV SEXUAL TRANSMISSION RISKS:
HIV transmission risk during anal sex 18 times higher than during vaginal sex
Roger Pebody, Published: 28 June 2010
..
The risk of HIV transmission during anal intercourse may be around 18 times greater than during vaginal intercourse, according to the results of a meta-analysis published online ahead of print in the International Journal of Epidemiology.
...
http://www.aidsmap.com/HIV-transmis...-higher-than-during-vaginal-sex/page/1446187/

Since non- consumation of marriage is reason for annulment of marriage, then same sex marriage OBVIOUSLY = encouragement of anus sex (2 males) or penetration with foreign objects/ other appendage (2 females or 2 males): which is highly abnormal if not beastly behaviour with high risk of injuries if not HIV. (Increased ambulance attendance to physical injuries, increased HIV burden on healthcare system since HIV is a complicated LIFE LONG contagious disease.

Mom's with HIV can pass HIV to kid and also cannot breast feed (transmission risk) resulting in the kid being very much dependent on state welfare support for food and healthcare (mom would be poor cos HIV is expensive disease to treat).

Kid might grow up thinking anus sex is normal and even get HIV from anus sex in teenage years (latch key kids).

Same sex spouse might get HIV resulting in healthy spouse taking family leave further hurting productivity of his/ her employer resulting in reduced investments in Singapore economy.

HDB (public housing) gives couples a generous subsidy for new apartment ostensibly on the pretext that with a home, the couple can procreate and boost Singapore's birth rates which are now in dire straits. Same sex marriage couples would get upset if they cannot receive such generous subsidies, then again, why promise them a license to marry then deprive them of housing subsidies? Better to make the facts clear at the beginning.

Lastly, courts would be plagued with marital issues (divorce due to non-consumation by anus sex) or whatever kind of ritual is fashionable between homosexual couples. Judges would waste much time deciphering such odd disputes between same sex couples. Teachers would also be confused with new social conventions if a child has two daddy's or two mummies: whom to call for discipline issues, whom to call if a teenage girl has a 'pte issue', what if both daddies are on reservist and it is meet the teacher day? Who will teach a boy enlisting for NS about the inns and outs if he has two mummies?

What happens if each party independently decides to have a kid (buy sperm or via paid surrogate woman for male couples), would these folks reproduce at a ridiculous rate (a male can impregnate one surrogate each night as long as he has the $$$ to pay for her service): who is responsible for the child if the same sex couple divorces: the one who paid for the surrogacy(male payer) or the one who delivered the child (female couples). What happens if the surrogate mom decides that 2 dad's are an unhealthy family and now wants custody of the kid for his/ her bemifit? What happens to the mini army when the $$$ runs out?

When the kid is in his/her teenage years, can he sue the government of negligence for not providing the 'correct' home environment especially if one or both parents have died from HIV leaving the kid orphaned? If the kid, having passed statutory age has consensual anus sex with his/ her dad: is that okay?

The fact that a vast majority of HIV cases in Singapore are amongst homosexual people, besides alluding to the fact that anus sex is a highly dangerous and reckless act also suggest that homosexual people are more likely have multiple sex partners: this making them unsuitable for marriage certification in the first place since fidelity is a significant pillar of marriage.

Would Singapore need more foreigner influx for population replacement as anus sex yields no kids? Will our national reserves, elected president not withstanding (he could well be a homosexual bank ex-CEO), be exhausted on HIV related healthcare costs and welfare for orphaned kids and broken families?

These are all questions to be answered by those pink dot movement people who might want to distribute certificates of marriage to their friends or family like girl guide cookies. No need to make this world more complicated, crazy and confused than it already is...
 

kryonlight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
A man and a woman can also enjoy anal sex and the risk of infection is the same. It's no surprise that Christians form the majority of retards.
 

songsongjurong

Alfrescian
Loyal
ambsheader.jpg

Public be advised to stay indoor.

HIV might mutate into airborne infection!!!

Arsehole bandit wanted,Dead or Alive!
 

kiwibird7

Alfrescian
Loyal
In life, one cannot force others to like or accept certain types of people. That is why the PINK DOT event is a waste of time. What do they really hope to achieve? That people would like GAYs and accept them? And if not, would labelling and name calling those that do not like or accept them as homophobes result in any changes?

These GAYS should thank their lucky stars that they are at least left alone to practice their twisted sexual perversions in private and not hunted down and sent to concentration camps like in NAZI GERMANY days of WWII.
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
‘QUARTET OF TRUTH’: ADULT ‘KIDS’ OF GAY ‘PARENTS’ SPEAK OUT

"When we institutionalize same-sex marriage... we move from permitting citizens the freedom to live as they choose, to promoting same-sex headed households. Now we are normalizing a family structure where a child will always be deprived daily of one gender influence and the relationship with at least one natural parent. Our cultural narrative becomes one that, in essence, tells children that they have no right to the natural family structure or their biological parents, but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires." -Katy Faust

(New Orleans, LA, Jan 13th 2015) - As the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals considers whether to strike down laws in three states banning same-sex "marriage," four adult children of homosexual parents have filed court briefings arguing that government-sanctioned homosexual unions could lead to disaster for thousands of kids.

Katy Faust, Dawn Stefanowicz, B.N. Klein, and Robert Oscar Lopez, who were all raised by homosexual parents, each submitted briefs to the 5th Circuit opposing the legalization of same-sex "marriage." Recounting childhood memories of households made deeply dysfunctional by their parents' sexual appetites and the radical subculture that went along with their "gay" identities, all four argued that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples will likely lead to the exploitation and abuse of countless children for political and personal gain.

"I grew up with a parent and her partner in an atmosphere in which gay ideology was used as a tool of repression, retribution and abuse," wrote B. N. Klein of her lesbian mother and her series of live-in lovers.

"While I do not believe all gays would be de facto bad parents, I know that the gay community has never in my lifetime put children first as anything other than a piece of property, a past mistake or a political tool to be dressed up and taken out as part of a dog-and-pony show to impress the well-meaning," Klein wrote. She added that as a child of a lesbian mother, she was pressured to pay "constant homage and attention" to her mother's gay identity, taught that "some Jews and most Christians were stupid and hated gays and were violent," and told that homosexuals were "much more creative and artistic because they were not repressed and were naturally more ‘feeling.'"

While Klein classified her upbringing as abusive, Robert Oscar Lopez told the court that his own childhood upbringing by his mother and her longtime partner represented the "best possible conditions for a child raised by a same-sex couple." Even so, Lopez testified that the lack of a father figure in his life, combined with the influence of the radical gay culture in which he was raised, gave rise to a devastating confusion about his own sexuality and ultimately led to his becoming a homosexual prostitute in his teen years in order to fulfill his craving for acceptance and love from older men.

"Had I been formally studied by same-sex parenting ‘experts' in 1985, I would have confirmed their rosiest estimations of LGBT family life," Lopez wore. "[But] behind these façades of a happy ‘outcome' lay many problems."

"I experienced a great deal of sexual confusion," Lopez wrote. "I had an inexplicable compulsion to have sex with older males … and wanted to have sex with older men who were my father's age, though at the time I could scarcely understand what I was doing."

Lopez said that he has spoken to dozens of other adult children of homosexuals, and that many of them have similar stories of pain and damage inflicted by the absence of a biological parent and the unwanted "step-parent" type relationship demanded by their homosexual parents' lovers. Lopez included testimonies from nine of them in his brief, but said there were many more who were afraid to speak out for fear that the homosexual lobby would target them for harassment like they have Lopez himself.

"Children raised by same-sex couples face a gauntlet if they break the silence about the ‘no disadvantages' consensus," Lopez wrote, after recounting how homosexual activists harassed his employers and spread lies about him on the internet after he first came forward about his own childhood experiences as the son of a lesbian. "In such a climate, I must conclude that placing children in same-sex couples' homes is dangerous, because they have no space or latitude to express negative feelings about losing a mom or dad, and in fact they have much to fear if they do."

Katy Faust also [wrote], "Some adult children with gay parents shy away from making their thoughts about marriage public because we do not want to jeopardize our relationships with those to whom our hearts are tethered. Unfortunately, many gay-marriage lobbyists have made gay marriage the sole badge of loyalty to our LGBT family and friends."

..........

http://australianmarriage.org/quartet-of-truth-adult-kids-of-gay-parents-speak-out/
 
Last edited:

lifeafter41

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
‘QUARTET OF TRUTH’: ADULT ‘KIDS’ OF GAY ‘PARENTS’ SPEAK OUT

"When we institutionalize same-sex marriage... we move from permitting citizens the freedom to live as they choose, to promoting same-sex headed households. Now we are normalizing a family structure where a child will always be deprived daily of one gender influence and the relationship with at least one natural parent. Our cultural narrative becomes one that, in essence, tells children that they have no right to the natural family structure or their biological parents, but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires." -Katy Faust

(New Orleans, LA, Jan 13th 2015) - As the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals considers whether to strike down laws in three states banning same-sex "marriage," four adult children of homosexual parents have filed court briefings arguing that government-sanctioned homosexual unions could lead to disaster for thousands of kids.

Katy Faust, Dawn Stefanowicz, B.N. Klein, and Robert Oscar Lopez, who were all raised by homosexual parents, each submitted briefs to the 5th Circuit opposing the legalization of same-sex "marriage." Recounting childhood memories of households made deeply dysfunctional by their parents' sexual appetites and the radical subculture that went along with their "gay" identities, all four argued that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples will likely lead to the exploitation and abuse of countless children for political and personal gain.

"I grew up with a parent and her partner in an atmosphere in which gay ideology was used as a tool of repression, retribution and abuse," wrote B. N. Klein of her lesbian mother and her series of live-in lovers.

"While I do not believe all gays would be de facto bad parents, I know that the gay community has never in my lifetime put children first as anything other than a piece of property, a past mistake or a political tool to be dressed up and taken out as part of a dog-and-pony show to impress the well-meaning," Klein wrote. She added that as a child of a lesbian mother, she was pressured to pay "constant homage and attention" to her mother's gay identity, taught that "some Jews and most Christians were stupid and hated gays and were violent," and told that homosexuals were "much more creative and artistic because they were not repressed and were naturally more ‘feeling.'"

While Klein classified her upbringing as abusive, Robert Oscar Lopez told the court that his own childhood upbringing by his mother and her longtime partner represented the "best possible conditions for a child raised by a same-sex couple." Even so, Lopez testified that the lack of a father figure in his life, combined with the influence of the radical gay culture in which he was raised, gave rise to a devastating confusion about his own sexuality and ultimately led to his becoming a homosexual prostitute in his teen years in order to fulfill his craving for acceptance and love from older men.

"Had I been formally studied by same-sex parenting ‘experts' in 1985, I would have confirmed their rosiest estimations of LGBT family life," Lopez wore. "[But] behind these façades of a happy ‘outcome' lay many problems."

"I experienced a great deal of sexual confusion," Lopez wrote. "I had an inexplicable compulsion to have sex with older males … and wanted to have sex with older men who were my father's age, though at the time I could scarcely understand what I was doing."

Lopez said that he has spoken to dozens of other adult children of homosexuals, and that many of them have similar stories of pain and damage inflicted by the absence of a biological parent and the unwanted "step-parent" type relationship demanded by their homosexual parents' lovers. Lopez included testimonies from nine of them in his brief, but said there were many more who were afraid to speak out for fear that the homosexual lobby would target them for harassment like they have Lopez himself.

"Children raised by same-sex couples face a gauntlet if they break the silence about the ‘no disadvantages' consensus," Lopez wrote, after recounting how homosexual activists harassed his employers and spread lies about him on the internet after he first came forward about his own childhood experiences as the son of a lesbian. "In such a climate, I must conclude that placing children in same-sex couples' homes is dangerous, because they have no space or latitude to express negative feelings about losing a mom or dad, and in fact they have much to fear if they do."

Katy Faust also [wrote], "Some adult children with gay parents shy away from making their thoughts about marriage public because we do not want to jeopardize our relationships with those to whom our hearts are tethered. Unfortunately, many gay-marriage lobbyists have made gay marriage the sole badge of loyalty to our LGBT family and friends."

..........

http://australianmarriage.org/quartet-of-truth-adult-kids-of-gay-parents-speak-out/


It is a sad fact that even with the same sex couple, even with the sanction of same sex marriage in the USA, will also crave for acceptance into mainstream, what more a child that is "born" into this "family" unit.

Interestingly is that as the child grows up into adult, will they be taught by their "parents" that the family unit consist of male and female or will they insist on same sex is the norm......just as they have done.

This statement : but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires." -Katy Faust[/U]
Is very sad but true......sexual grooming is the word here.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This statement : but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires." -Katy Faust[/U]
Is very sad but true......sexual grooming is the word here.

yes its true,children are the victims of their parents,this statement is true not just for same sex marriages but for heterosexual marriages,in fact different sex marriages or the "normies" may be far more abusive and far more destructive in the overwhelming evidence in the history of mankind.....i think how abusive a child's childhood is depends on how abusive and dysfunctional human beings are his parents are not their sexual orientation.
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
The disaster of same sex marriage for Singapore:
HIGH HIV SEXUAL TRANSMISSION RISKS:


Since non- consumation of marriage is reason for annulment of marriage, then same sex marriage OBVIOUSLY = encouragement of anus sex (2 males) or penetration with foreign objects/ other appendage (2 females or 2 males): which is highly abnormal if not beastly behaviour with high risk of injuries if not HIV. (Increased ambulance attendance to physical injuries, increased HIV burden on healthcare system since HIV is a complicated LIFE LONG contagious disease.

Mom's with HIV can pass HIV to kid and also cannot breast feed (transmission risk) resulting in the kid being very much dependent on state welfare support for food and healthcare (mom would be poor cos HIV is expensive disease to treat).

Kid might grow up thinking anus sex is normal and even get HIV from anus sex in teenage years (latch key kids).

Same sex spouse might get HIV resulting in healthy spouse taking family leave further hurting productivity of his/ her employer resulting in reduced investments in Singapore economy.

HDB (public housing) gives couples a generous subsidy for new apartment ostensibly on the pretext that with a home, the couple can procreate and boost Singapore's birth rates which are now in dire straits. Same sex marriage couples would get upset if they cannot receive such generous subsidies, then again, why promise them a license to marry then deprive them of housing subsidies? Better to make the facts clear at the beginning.

Lastly, courts would be plagued with marital issues (divorce due to non-consumation by anus sex) or whatever kind of ritual is fashionable between homosexual couples. Judges would waste much time deciphering such odd disputes between same sex couples. Teachers would also be confused with new social conventions if a child has two daddy's or two mummies: whom to call for discipline issues, whom to call if a teenage girl has a 'pte issue', what if both daddies are on reservist and it is meet the teacher day? Who will teach a boy enlisting for NS about the inns and outs if he has two mummies?

What happens if each party independently decides to have a kid (buy sperm or via paid surrogate woman for male couples), would these folks reproduce at a ridiculous rate (a male can impregnate one surrogate each night as long as he has the $$$ to pay for her service): who is responsible for the child if the same sex couple divorces: the one who paid for the surrogacy(male payer) or the one who delivered the child (female couples). What happens if the surrogate mom decides that 2 dad's are an unhealthy family and now wants custody of the kid for his/ her bemifit? What happens to the mini army when the $$$ runs out?

When the kid is in his/her teenage years, can he sue the government of negligence for not providing the 'correct' home environment especially if one or both parents have died from HIV leaving the kid orphaned? If the kid, having passed statutory age has consensual anus sex with his/ her dad: is that okay?

The fact that a vast majority of HIV cases in Singapore are amongst homosexual people, besides alluding to the fact that anus sex is a highly dangerous and reckless act also suggest that homosexual people are more likely have multiple sex partners: this making them unsuitable for marriage certification in the first place since fidelity is a significant pillar of marriage.

Would Singapore need more foreigner influx for population replacement as anus sex yields no kids? Will our national reserves, elected president not withstanding (he could well be a homosexual bank ex-CEO), be exhausted on HIV related healthcare costs and welfare for orphaned kids and broken families?

These are all questions to be answered by those pink dot movement people who might want to distribute certificates of marriage to their friends or family like girl guide cookies. No need to make this world more complicated, crazy and confused than it already is...

Good may Roy Ngerng and Amos Yee die of AIDS
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is a sad fact that even with the same sex couple, even with the sanction of same sex marriage in the USA, will also crave for acceptance into mainstream, what more a child that is "born" into this "family" unit.

Interestingly is that as the child grows up into adult, will they be taught by their "parents" that the family unit consist of male and female or will they insist on same sex is the norm......just as they have done.

This statement : but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires." -Katy Faust[/U]
Is very sad but true......sexual grooming is the word here.

No I think what this person is saying the child of the gay parents is denied the rights of having natural family structure and thus the satisfaction of adult desires here not refer to sexual grooming but other personal gain like sense of fulfilment from having children and other personal reasons.
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
yes its true,children are the victims of their parents,this statement is true not just for same sex marriages but for heterosexual marriages,in fact different sex marriages or the "normies" may be far more abusive and far more destructive in the overwhelming evidence in the history of mankind.....i think how abusive a child's childhood is depends on how abusive and dysfunctional human beings are his parents are not their sexual orientation.

Yes you are right. That sentence applies as long as the parents want the children for their own personal gain. Also apply to single people adopting children to safeguard against old age or for sense of personal fulfilment.
 

lifeafter41

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
No I think what this person is saying the child of the gay parents is denied the rights of having natural family structure and thus the satisfaction of adult desires here not refer to sexual grooming but other personal gain like sense of fulfilment from having children and other personal reasons.

There is no rights to speak of for the child, unfortunately, when they are thrust into the "family" unit, by means of surrogacy or worse, adoption, if that is allowable for same sex parents.

The choice is not theirs, but already made for them.

It's a sad fact, that when one is born or raised into this kind of "family" unit that it's already skewed towards the unnatural.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
There is no rights to speak of for the child, unfortunately, when they are thrust into the "family" unit, by means of surrogacy or worse, adoption, if that is allowable for same sex parents.

The choice is not theirs, but already made for them.

It's a sad fact, that when one is born or raised into this kind of "family" unit that it's already skewed towards the unnatural.

each night they hear noises from their "parent's" bedroom they sneak in to find them humping their rears or licking 69. they will think those are normal positions and grow up doing the same.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
There is no rights to speak of for the child, unfortunately, when they are thrust into the "family" unit, by means of surrogacy or worse, adoption, if that is allowable for same sex parents.

The choice is not theirs, but already made for them.

It's a sad fact, that when one is born or raised into this kind of "family" unit that it's already skewed towards the unnatural.

so u think the perfect and only "family" unit is the natural parents?what if the parents were totally fucked up and that was what led to the reason for adoption anyway,the state had to intervene and step in.is it better to have one "parent" who truly cares or both parents who are complete scumbags?and ginfreely said the child is denied the rights of having a natural family structure,what about the tons of children that were raised in single parent families for whatever reason death,divorce,jail or suicide or illness.
 

lifeafter41

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
so u think the perfect and only "family" unit is the natural parents?what if the parents were totally fucked up and that was what led to the reason for adoption anyway,the state had to intervene and step in.is it better to have one "parent" who truly cares or both parents who are complete scumbags?and ginfreely said the child is denied the rights of having a natural family structure,what about the tons of children that were raised in single parent families for whatever reason death,divorce,jail or suicide or illness.

There is no perfect family as every family has its own sets of problem to deal with, be it natural, or when the parents due to circumstances are single, whether by choice, divorced or death or illnesses on 1 parent.

At the very least, the child know that the parents are male, fatherly figure, female, motherly figure.....no confusion there

The context here is same sex couple........
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
There is no perfect family as every family has its own sets of problem to deal with, be it natural, or when the parents due to circumstances are single, whether by choice, divorced or death or illnesses on 1 parent.

At the very least, the child know that the parents are male, fatherly figure, female, motherly figure.....no confusion there

The context here is same sex couple........

so u saying the males have to be the fatherly figure and the females the motherly figure,same goes for the boys and girls and brothers and sisters and nieces and cousins?girls have to play the traditional female roles and boys have to play the traditional male roles?no guys putting on makeup and bras and pregnant suits acting as mrs doubtfire?what if guy marries a girl from the army,the guy happens to be a little sissy and artsy fartsy and likes fashion,and the girl happens to be the most masculine macho dyke military sergeant u ever seen?will there be any confusion there?is it possible for single woman to raise up strong,independent,emotionally healthy children same goes for single fathers or is it someplace somewhere their brains synapses and neurons are being fooled and they is need a father or mother figure immediately or.....
 
Last edited:

Safety1st

Alfrescian
Loyal
Since these gays know the high risk of being gays why don't they change to become real man and woman. HIV transmission for these people must come from anal sex why not do it on a real pussy? Stupid right?
 
Top