The Alcohol REACH "Poll" that doesn't allow you to disagree.

[Confuseous]

Who the FUCK designs a poll with NO option to disagree????? How the fuck does this even count as a poll? What kind of fucking public consultation consists of constraining responses to agreements only? Did the officer behind this graduate with a degree in Fucking Fascism??? Oh no, this ain’t the rank and file, this is the fucking director or deputy director or wanker-in-chief who only has one hand on the keyboard at any time. Why don’t you just run a poll with a question “My fart smells just like peacocks in heat” and give two options for “Agree” and “Fucking Agree”??? WAS THIS FUCKING WRITTEN BY A BLACK GUY IN A SHOWER ON A FUCKING BAR OF SOAP???

Was this poll not fucking vetted? Did not one fucktard worth his cubicle swivel chair point out how ridiculously and unusably cock-skewed this is going to be? MISERABLE TWAT WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU DID YOU INHALE ONE FART TOO MANY WITH YOUR NOSE UP THE HORSE-FUCKER’S ARSE??? Was this some titty-twat’s idea of massaging data? Well ol’ Titty-I’Twat is doing that massaging with some fucking fat fingers. BIG FUCKING PRICK I’LL CUT YOUR FINGERS OFF WITH A CORKSCREW.

- http://piaroh.wordpress.com/2013/11/25/hung/

 

[Leongsam]

No different from the "Merger" poll of 1962.

There was no option for not agreeing to any form of merger in the first place.

http://www.singapore-elections.com/nr-1962/

 

[laksaboy]

People should boycott the farce called REACH.

The govt doesn't care about your opinions and feedback, but it wants to be perceived as a consultative govt.

 

[xingguy]

No different from the "Merger" poll of 1962.

There was no option for not agreeing to any form of merger in the first place.

http://www.singapore-elections.com/nr-1962/

Boss, did you actually see the form or trying to pull wool over our eyes.
In the last row, there is actually an option for reject merger.

 

[Leongsam]

Boss, did you actually see the form or trying to pull wool over our eyes.
In the last row, there is actually an option for reject merger.

A blank vote is not an option you twit.

The Barisan Socialists urged the casting of a blank vote as a rejection of the whole merger process. The PAP counted all blank votes as "Alternative A".

 

[xingguy]

A blank vote is not an option you twit.

The Barisan Socialists urged the casting of a blank vote as a rejection of the whole merger process. The PAP counted all blank votes as "Alternative A".

Boss, you are really a blind twit
It is stated clearly that blank votes are "None of the above (reject merger)", so how can that be not an option?

Look at the numbers:
397,626 (ALTERNATIVE A) - 144,077 (Blank votes) = 253,549 (ALTERNATIVE A wins)

[/URL][/IMG]

 

[Leongsam]

Boss, you are really a blind twit
It is stated clearly that blank votes are "None of the above (reject merger)", so how can that be not an option?

There was no "None of the above" in the ballot sheet.

This article explains the situation in more detail...

At a very early age, I realised how evil and manipulative LKY could be.

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singaporean_national_referendum,_1962


A referendum on the terms of integration into formation of Malaysia was held in Singapore on 1 September 1962 to adopt United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) under titled Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples provided for the granting of independence tocolonial countries and peoples in providing an inevitable legal linkage between self-determination and its goal of decolonisation, and a postulated new international law-based right of freedom also in economic self-determination. In Article 5 states: Immediate steps shall be taken in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories,[SUP][1][/SUP] or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, moreover on 15 December 1960 the United Nations General Assembly re-adopted United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1541 (XV) under titled Principles which should guide members in determining whether or nor an obligation exists to transmit the information called for under Article 73e of theUnited Nations Charter requires countries administering those colonies to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions.
Voters were offered three options, but did not have the choice of opposing integration. Option A, which provided for the highest level of autonomy was chosen by 96% of voters.[SUP][2]


[/SUP]
Campaign[edit]

Being strongly against the referendum, the Barisan Sosialis called for a boycott of the referendum, telling supporters to submit blank votes in protest of the "rigged" referendum. Over 144,000 blank votes were cast, over a quarter of all votes.[SUP][2][/SUP] This move had been anticipated by the ruling PAP government, as seen by the insertion of a clause that stated that all blank would be counted as a vote for the option that wins the most votes if there was no outright majority[SUP][2][/SUP] or that blank votes would be counted as Option <big>A</big>.[SUP][10][/SUP]

 

[xingguy]

There was no "None of the above" in the ballot sheet.

This article explains the situation in more detail...

At a very early age, I realised how evil and manipulative LKY could be.

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singaporean_national_referendum,_1962


A referendum on the terms of integration into formation of Malaysia was held in Singapore on 1 September 1962 to adopt United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) under titled Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples provided for the granting of independence tocolonial countries and peoples in providing an inevitable legal linkage between self-determination and its goal of decolonisation, and a postulated new international law-based right of freedom also in economic self-determination. In Article 5 states: Immediate steps shall be taken in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories,[SUP][1][/SUP] or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, moreover on 15 December 1960 the United Nations General Assembly re-adopted United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1541 (XV) under titled Principles which should guide members in determining whether or nor an obligation exists to transmit the information called for under Article 73e of theUnited Nations Charter requires countries administering those colonies to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions.
Voters were offered three options, but did not have the choice of opposition integration. Option A, which provided for the highest level of autonomy was chosen by 96% of voters.[SUP][2]


[/SUP]
Campaign[edit]

Being strongly against the referendum, the Barisan Sosialis called for a boycott of the referendum, telling supporters to submit blank votes in protest of the "rigged" referendum. Over 144,000 blank votes were cast, over a quarter of all votes.[SUP][2][/SUP] This move had been anticipated by the ruling PAP government, as seen by the insertion of a clause that stated that all blank would be counted as a vote for the option that wins the most votes if there was no outright majority[SUP][2][/SUP] or that blank votes would be counted as Option <big>A</big>.[SUP][10][/SUP]

Boss, a thousand apologies for calling you a blind twit
Thanks for the history lesson