• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

WP to send GRC MP to PE

rover2sg

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 10, 2010
Messages
474
Points
18
Palmer has resigned and so PE is without an MP. What legal rights have TSL to assume that he is “covering” the work of the ex-MP. This open the door for the other political parties also to send their nominees and to do likewise and be given equal privileges.

For a start WP should send its MP in their GRC to cover Palmer duties.
:)
 
Palmer has resigned and so PE is without an MP. What legal rights have TSL to assume that he is “covering” the work of the ex-MP. This open the door for the other political parties also to send their nominees and to do likewise and be given equal privileges.

For a start WP should send its MP in their GRC to cover Palmer duties.
:)

no need for WP to perpetuate a PAP wrong.

It will be doubly satisfying if WP can send in LLL and go on to trounce PAP by 66% to 34%.
 
no need for WP to perpetuate a PAP wrong.

It will be doubly satisfying if WP can send in LLL and go on to trounce PAP by 66% to 34%.

It is not the time for heroics. If LLL could be persuaded, they might send someone else. I don't think they will sacrifice an NCMP though for MP or NCMP, it still counts as a voice in parliament, even though NCMP has no voting rights. Voting rights today is just academic under the present skew representation with more than two-thirds control by the PAP.
 
Last edited:
no need for WP to perpetuate a PAP wrong.

It will be doubly satisfying if WP can send in LLL and go on to trounce PAP by 66% to 34%.

Don't you realise that, in a way, PAP has already started the election campaign. Let the other parties join in the fray too.:)
 
It is not the time for heroics. If LLL could be persuaded, they might send someone else. I don't think they will sacrifice an NCMP though for MP or NCMP, it still counts as a voice in parliament, even though NCMP has no voting rights. Voting rights today is just academic under the present skew representation with more than two-thirds control by the PAP.

Actually and logically, if there is not going to be a by-election, LLL should be given the MP seat for PE?:)
 
Last edited:
Actually and logically, if there is not going to be a by-election, LLL should be given the MP seat for PE?:)

That could be if that is in fact the rule but it would be unlikely that such a rule could be passed. What if the runner up actually lost his deposit? Should he actually be given the seat?
 
That could be if that is in fact the rule but it would be unlikely that such a rule could be passed. What if the runner up actually lost his deposit? Should he actually be given the seat?

LOL.... seriously though the 41 per cent obtained by Li Lian is far better than the 30 per cent of you know who.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top