• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

WP/AHTC/PRPTC court case – making a mountain out of a molehill

Johnrambo

Alfrescian
Loyal
I would think that it would be common practice to cross your "T"s and dot your "I"s when you are compiling a report that could potentially lead to a court case that could cost the public millions. According to reports, this is not the methodology practiced by PwC partner Goh Thien Phong (Goh). It is mind-boggling that he saw no need to provide FM Solutions and Services (FMSS), agent for Aljunied Hougang Town Council (AHTC) a chance to respond to his allegations before publishing his report. Goh claims that speaking with FMSS would not have changed his opinion but how can he know whether his mind would have been changed if he does not even know what they would have said to him? He never asked?

Doesn't it sound like Goh's mind was already (subconsciously or otherwise) made up? Has this prejudgment on the part of Goh (unwittingly or otherwise) resulted in a drain of public resources? If so, will there be repercussions? Can the public potentially take a case against PwC for negligence leading to the waste of public resources?

The trial to date has been focused on the minutiae, ranging from the level of one's command of the English language to whether or not trust is the same as control. Come on people! Don't we have real things to be concerned about? What is the actual harm that has been done to the people of Singapore or the residents of AHTC? Secondly, is the purported harm worth the herculean court case and its accompanying costs?

More at WP/AHTC/PRPTC court case – making a mountain out of a molehill https://tinyurI.com/ya82whly
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PAP staged a coup to get rid of the efficient WP MPs leading the town council. WP town council was showing sinkees how town council could deliver on services without always hiking fees. And that was shaming the PAP run town councils.

PAP thought that an audit would find evidence of wrong doing. After spending close to a million bucks, they found nothing. Of course, those overpaid PAP-friendly auditors from People'sWC have to justify their hiring. So they cooked up some OPINIONS. And those OPINIONS are used as a basis to takeover the well-run WP town council.
 
Top