- Joined
- Jul 22, 2008
- Messages
- 257
- Points
- 0
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_302234.html
Perhaps most damaging was the evidence of Yong's accomplice Reggie Gwee Chin Hian, 22, who testified that he had received drugs from Yong five to six occasions between May and June last year.
:
Once here, he would receive an SMS message with the telephone numbers of the recipients. On his trip on June 12, Yong, an odd-job worker, asked his friend Chai Hor Hsiang, 24, to accompany him.
:
They drove in at about 10pm and went to Yishun where Yong passed about 14g of heroin to Lim Foo Seng, 51 and received $5,000 in return.
:
Both Gwee and Lim have been jailed for 22 years for trafficking in drugs.
:
Yong's friend Chai was given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal as there was no evidence he knew of the drugs.
This is strange.
Reggie Gwee Chin Hian testified that he had received drugs from Yong but got only 22 years. Why no death penalty?

Yong passed about 14g of heroin to Lim Foo Seng - Lim had drugs in his possession - got only 22 years. Why no death penalty?

Chai was given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal as there was no evidence he knew of the drugs - sure or not?

Why target Yong Vui Kong for the death penalty? What about the rest of the people? Yong Vui Kong is only a mule, he make only $2000 for the errand. Is the PAP trying to protect the local drug lords here and their friends in Burma?

Is it ok to receive drugs from a drug mule and get only 22 years instead of the death penalty?

Any expert know why 22 years was given instead of death penalty?
