- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
[h=2]Is this double standards or triple standards from PAP
Govt?[/h]
April 26th, 2013 |
Author: Contributions
Nizam speaking at Hong Lim Park on 16 Feb
2013
The AMP saga is indeed disturbing, firstly AMP should state who are the 2
ministers who contacted them with regards to Nizam, and second would AMP sack
Nizam if he failed to resign and also would PAP stop funding AMP if Nizam
refused to resign?
What would happen to all the recipients then, when PAP cuts off their
funding, why is there a need to go down this road, what is PAP hoping to
achieve?
Well firstly, the funds come from tax payers monies, and Nizam speaking at
the speakers corner was not on behalf of any political party but for
Singaporeans.
So here’s the deal, a while back LKY made some remarks in his book “Hard
Truths” and then PM Lee said that he meant those statements in his own capacity
and it was not the view of the PAP, so here’s the question, how is it Nizam has
to quit AMP when he was speaking in his own capacity ?
Also why is the talented cartoonist being investigated for his cartoons, when
compared to the statements made in the books “Hard Truths”, and talking about
being partisan to politics, is AMP being partisan to PAP by telling Nizam not to
participate his activities of interest from a Singaporean standpoint?
Also is the Peoples’ Association funded by tax payers monies but serves the
PAP interests, how about having a minister in NTUC union, are these not
considered partisan?
I hope Singaporeans can all come together on May 1[SUP]st[/SUP] at Hong Lim
Park to unite and show that we will say “ NO to 6.9 million” and to show that we
are not daft or meek sheep that don’t know how to think for ourselves.
Singaporeans are intelligent and we do our own analysis and form our own
conclusion on matters of the country, we don’t need to be told how to think.
What is worrying is the unwillingness of PAP to accept critical feedback
which is vital for this countries development, does the PAP put its interest
before its citizens?
PAP is not Singapore and Singapore is not PAP!
See you all at Hong Lim Square, the whole world is watching how Singaporeans
unite!
Brothers and sisters, what we do in life, echoes in eternity!
See you soon!
.
Leo
Govt?[/h]
Nizam speaking at Hong Lim Park on 16 Feb
2013
The AMP saga is indeed disturbing, firstly AMP should state who are the 2
ministers who contacted them with regards to Nizam, and second would AMP sack
Nizam if he failed to resign and also would PAP stop funding AMP if Nizam
refused to resign?
What would happen to all the recipients then, when PAP cuts off their
funding, why is there a need to go down this road, what is PAP hoping to
achieve?
Well firstly, the funds come from tax payers monies, and Nizam speaking at
the speakers corner was not on behalf of any political party but for
Singaporeans.
So here’s the deal, a while back LKY made some remarks in his book “Hard
Truths” and then PM Lee said that he meant those statements in his own capacity
and it was not the view of the PAP, so here’s the question, how is it Nizam has
to quit AMP when he was speaking in his own capacity ?
Also why is the talented cartoonist being investigated for his cartoons, when
compared to the statements made in the books “Hard Truths”, and talking about
being partisan to politics, is AMP being partisan to PAP by telling Nizam not to
participate his activities of interest from a Singaporean standpoint?
Also is the Peoples’ Association funded by tax payers monies but serves the
PAP interests, how about having a minister in NTUC union, are these not
considered partisan?
I hope Singaporeans can all come together on May 1[SUP]st[/SUP] at Hong Lim
Park to unite and show that we will say “ NO to 6.9 million” and to show that we
are not daft or meek sheep that don’t know how to think for ourselves.
Singaporeans are intelligent and we do our own analysis and form our own
conclusion on matters of the country, we don’t need to be told how to think.
What is worrying is the unwillingness of PAP to accept critical feedback
which is vital for this countries development, does the PAP put its interest
before its citizens?
PAP is not Singapore and Singapore is not PAP!
See you all at Hong Lim Square, the whole world is watching how Singaporeans
unite!
Brothers and sisters, what we do in life, echoes in eternity!
See you soon!
.
Leo
