Transmodified from "Excessive social security may erode filial piety"
PUBLISHED MAR 29, 2016, 5:00 AM SGT
FACEBOOK1,366TWITTEREMAIL
Got Jane Austen rebels debate on how much more Ruler Loong should spend on providing greater social security for the more poor aging peasants, and on the pitfalls of excessive welfare ("Pitfalls of excessive welfare in Nordic model" by Nordic Oily Muurainen; last Saturday).
Jane Austen rebels are piling pressure on the regime to increase spending on welfare - and the regime is responding after 69.9% dumb-dumbs voted for them in 2015.
Lumpar understand, old doctrine should be revived, 'old or poor peasants die, their problem". This model has done good for Commie PRC and the Hongkies. Jane Austen rebels should not egg peasants to cross the line and keep using the ballot box to demand more and more spending?
*Of course, Ruler Loong and his courtiers do not want peasants to impose limits on their powers via Constitution (kenna amended like changing underwear to make life easier for the regime) or procedural erections (this one a bit harder to manage).
Lackeys , say Chia Yong-Yong, got rich father to sarpok her or me got well paying jobs, cannot fathom welfare more old and poor peasants. They simply die cheaply is the best outcome, why we or their peasant children pay taxes so that a few horny old peasants splurge on PRC hookers?
Got Jane Austen peasants counter, "its affordability you dummies". Ang Moh Yankee expat family earn 29k still say Peasantpore expensive, then they go back to Uncle Sam lah. If poor peasants cannot eat meat, then buy cheaper fish lor? Why bring affordability to the picture? They want to eat at hawker center, food courts or restaurants? Go tell the choice to Vivian lor!"
Got one commie economist Zhang Wuchang say Commie Chinks should not adopt essentially Ang Moh practice of regime-funded social sex security.
The 80-year-old is likely a paedophile who enjoyed the sex scene in Uncle Sam, party at the best orgies over there, before he patriotism acted up, returned to Commie PRC, and was close to some of the top sex economists of the day.
His assertion: Excessive social sex security will lower sex drive.
Peril awaits the Commie Chinks civilisation once the duty of caring for one's old and helpless parents is shifted to the Commie regime who got trillion peanuts in taxing foreign merchants while selling cheap peasants to work at their polluted factories, he added.
What he said jolted me, as did a recent survey by a underwear collecting agency in Nihon, which found that less than a third of young Nihon peasants, fed up with corrupt and inept policies, agreed that it was not their job to pay taxes so that LDP spends pork barrels to buy soiled panties to screw up the country. The rest said it had no opinions as long the panties are soiled.
Yet Lesile Ah Fong-Fong did not tell peasants that European Paedophiles are feeding on their young by paying for old Europeans to screw South East Asiatic children based on 'sex for votes'.
Peasantpore got policy pay Minions millions to create new problem yet lecture lesser young peasants to look after more older peasants. Of course cannot say LKY's 'Stop at Two' policy and Eugenics to blame for the woes else sure got 120k lawsuit waiting for you.
A national sex survey conducted a few years ago found that most peasants under 50 and earning $1,000 or more are brainwashed into thinking that looking after peasant parents is their duty while the rich Minions and lackey take home millions and some want to serve plates in fancy French restaurants.
But more of those who read Jane Austen novels and earning less than $1,000 said the regime should bear more of the burden since they collect so much rent from foreign merchants and local peasant. Morever Ho Jinx is likely to lose the money from her punts anyway, so why the fuss in some welfare for more old peasants?.
Leslie Ah Fong likely to be inspired by the black heart pro-regime Chia Yong-Yong to craft such a demoralising essay.
*Ah Fon-Fong, collecting fat cat stipends while not attending pious Sunday classes has make him dumb dumb. The solution is not getting lesser young peasants sarpok more old peasants in Peasantpore or old European paedophiles feeding on their young peasants. It is fixing the hypocritical regimes who screw up but push the problem back to their peasants while they sit down and look pretty.
PUBLISHED MAR 29, 2016, 5:00 AM SGT
FACEBOOK1,366TWITTEREMAIL
Got Jane Austen rebels debate on how much more Ruler Loong should spend on providing greater social security for the more poor aging peasants, and on the pitfalls of excessive welfare ("Pitfalls of excessive welfare in Nordic model" by Nordic Oily Muurainen; last Saturday).
Jane Austen rebels are piling pressure on the regime to increase spending on welfare - and the regime is responding after 69.9% dumb-dumbs voted for them in 2015.
Lumpar understand, old doctrine should be revived, 'old or poor peasants die, their problem". This model has done good for Commie PRC and the Hongkies. Jane Austen rebels should not egg peasants to cross the line and keep using the ballot box to demand more and more spending?
*Of course, Ruler Loong and his courtiers do not want peasants to impose limits on their powers via Constitution (kenna amended like changing underwear to make life easier for the regime) or procedural erections (this one a bit harder to manage).
Lackeys , say Chia Yong-Yong, got rich father to sarpok her or me got well paying jobs, cannot fathom welfare more old and poor peasants. They simply die cheaply is the best outcome, why we or their peasant children pay taxes so that a few horny old peasants splurge on PRC hookers?
Got Jane Austen peasants counter, "its affordability you dummies". Ang Moh Yankee expat family earn 29k still say Peasantpore expensive, then they go back to Uncle Sam lah. If poor peasants cannot eat meat, then buy cheaper fish lor? Why bring affordability to the picture? They want to eat at hawker center, food courts or restaurants? Go tell the choice to Vivian lor!"
Got one commie economist Zhang Wuchang say Commie Chinks should not adopt essentially Ang Moh practice of regime-funded social sex security.
The 80-year-old is likely a paedophile who enjoyed the sex scene in Uncle Sam, party at the best orgies over there, before he patriotism acted up, returned to Commie PRC, and was close to some of the top sex economists of the day.
His assertion: Excessive social sex security will lower sex drive.
Peril awaits the Commie Chinks civilisation once the duty of caring for one's old and helpless parents is shifted to the Commie regime who got trillion peanuts in taxing foreign merchants while selling cheap peasants to work at their polluted factories, he added.
What he said jolted me, as did a recent survey by a underwear collecting agency in Nihon, which found that less than a third of young Nihon peasants, fed up with corrupt and inept policies, agreed that it was not their job to pay taxes so that LDP spends pork barrels to buy soiled panties to screw up the country. The rest said it had no opinions as long the panties are soiled.
Yet Lesile Ah Fong-Fong did not tell peasants that European Paedophiles are feeding on their young by paying for old Europeans to screw South East Asiatic children based on 'sex for votes'.
Peasantpore got policy pay Minions millions to create new problem yet lecture lesser young peasants to look after more older peasants. Of course cannot say LKY's 'Stop at Two' policy and Eugenics to blame for the woes else sure got 120k lawsuit waiting for you.
A national sex survey conducted a few years ago found that most peasants under 50 and earning $1,000 or more are brainwashed into thinking that looking after peasant parents is their duty while the rich Minions and lackey take home millions and some want to serve plates in fancy French restaurants.
But more of those who read Jane Austen novels and earning less than $1,000 said the regime should bear more of the burden since they collect so much rent from foreign merchants and local peasant. Morever Ho Jinx is likely to lose the money from her punts anyway, so why the fuss in some welfare for more old peasants?.
Leslie Ah Fong likely to be inspired by the black heart pro-regime Chia Yong-Yong to craft such a demoralising essay.
*Ah Fon-Fong, collecting fat cat stipends while not attending pious Sunday classes has make him dumb dumb. The solution is not getting lesser young peasants sarpok more old peasants in Peasantpore or old European paedophiles feeding on their young peasants. It is fixing the hypocritical regimes who screw up but push the problem back to their peasants while they sit down and look pretty.
Last edited:
