- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 4,081
- Points
- 48
'Politics is a contest for power but the key principle when you have power is, don't take advantage of people under your charge, and always be honest and upfront with them. And always be honest and upfront with your people. All of us make mistakes. When a mistake is made, just come clean and say so. But do not cover up. That is why I have not let this go.' - Vivian Balakrishnan
Who was VB really ranting against? Was he saying that LTK had misused his power and 'take(n) advantage of people under (his) charge'? If so, who were the people LTK had charge of and taken advantage of? SL? PS? The hawkers? And if he were accusing LTK of misuse of power here, how did it square with his declaration that LTK was an 'honourable man' half a breath later?
So was he referring obliquely to some other people? Was he in fact suggesting that powerful people above him had taken advantage of him by making him flog a dead horse with a limp 'dossier', and in so doing, ruled out any chance of an elegant exit for him?
And was he also angry that once again, the PAPzis had trained an Indian MP at WP, so as to give the impression that WP is always attacking Indians? Remember the other idiots, Vikram (Nigerian scam) Nair and Hri (pay your way out of NS) Kumar?
VB might be a bit of an ivory tower politician but he ain't dumb. He must know about the futility of this Battle of the Bulge type counter-offensive. And he must know about the creative ways in which the alternative media will make him look stupid. So, that he had done this must have been a response to a no questions asked directive from LHL to protect the untouchables, KBW, NEH, LSS and TCH at VB's expense.
Who was VB really ranting against? Was he saying that LTK had misused his power and 'take(n) advantage of people under (his) charge'? If so, who were the people LTK had charge of and taken advantage of? SL? PS? The hawkers? And if he were accusing LTK of misuse of power here, how did it square with his declaration that LTK was an 'honourable man' half a breath later?
So was he referring obliquely to some other people? Was he in fact suggesting that powerful people above him had taken advantage of him by making him flog a dead horse with a limp 'dossier', and in so doing, ruled out any chance of an elegant exit for him?
And was he also angry that once again, the PAPzis had trained an Indian MP at WP, so as to give the impression that WP is always attacking Indians? Remember the other idiots, Vikram (Nigerian scam) Nair and Hri (pay your way out of NS) Kumar?
VB might be a bit of an ivory tower politician but he ain't dumb. He must know about the futility of this Battle of the Bulge type counter-offensive. And he must know about the creative ways in which the alternative media will make him look stupid. So, that he had done this must have been a response to a no questions asked directive from LHL to protect the untouchables, KBW, NEH, LSS and TCH at VB's expense.
Last edited: