- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
[h=1]WHERE IS THE LOVE, PAP??[/h]
Post date:
29 Apr 2015 - 5:54pm
[Pic Credit: RP]
Currently there are TWO scandals with the civil service. One involving the SCDF while the other involving IDA. You can very clearly see the exact position of the PAP government in their handling of these two lapses.
For the SCDF case, the headline in the Straits Times read - SCDF 'will leave no stone unturned' in video probe. I think it is really sad that when the case is against SINGAPOREANS, you say no stone will be left unturned. For the IDA case when HONESTY and INTEGRITY are at risk, you decided to take the word of a FOREIGNER!! Has the PAP government NO SHAME at all?!
I must reiterate, what the boys did in the SCDF video clip is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE. But they were passing out, so some euphoria may have gone to their head. Some of the description by the PAP internet brigade was really overboard and I will not quote any of it here. These remarks made against the Malays were totally uncalled for!!
Firemen are easily one of the bravest people around. They have to risk their lives and run into burning buildings!! If you ask me, they are certainly braver than ANY of our paper Generals, since none of them has never been to war before!! So, what is hurt/damaged here? Just a thrashed bunk. Worst case scenario, just bill the boys for ALL the repairs made.
This is entirely different from the IDA saga!! A foreigner used her MBA from a degree mill to get into IDA. The acceptance of her “toilet paper degree” is a huge insult to our education system which prides itself in MERITOCRACY!! This meritocracy was painfully built up by FIFTY years of hard work!! In the blink of an eye, HONESTY has been thrown out of the window and a CHEATING culture may actually prevail after this!!
SO, which one of the above is the more heinous crime?! WHY are there are always TWO standards? One for Singaporeans AND another one for Foreigners?! When Singaporean teen beat up a foreigner, Minister Shanmugam condemned it and said it was SICKENING. How come no comments were made when foreigners beat up Singaporean taxi-driver?!
Like every couple that goes through a breakup or divorce, they always like to ask, “Have you ever loved me at all?” This is one question that I really hope PAP can answer. Because on the surface, it seem that PAP had always been more interested in gaining political power rather than improving the people’s well-being. Where can you see that?
ONE, how come the JURY was removed from our justice system? Of course I understand that when there is a jury involved, sometimes criminals may get away scot-free. For instance, like OJ Simpson’s case. BUT, without a jury involved, the JUDGE now has way too much power in his hands. For instance, if there was a jury involved, will we ever find AMOS guilty of the charge made against him? Most likely not. But if this was ruled by a Judge, Amos’ chances certainly look bleak.
NEXT, the PAP introduced this thing call GRC which I have NEVER, EVER seen in any other First World country! Riding on the train to so call protect minority races, this GRC is the most powerful weapon in PAP’s arsenal and is supposed to perpetuate their power till the end of time. Of course, they did not count on us seeing through the smoke screen in less than 30 years since its introduction. I am sure they regret not changing the constitution to create a 87-member GRC now!! Perhaps, they are even thinking, why they never change Singapore’s system to a monarchy when they were holding on to so much power!!
Then, the concept of Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) was introduced. This scheme was supposed to introduce people who are NOT affiliated to any political party to represent an alternative voice for the people. INSTEAD, they made the infamous clown – Calvin Cheng a NMP. How can you accept an ex-PAP member to become a NMP?! He is the FIRST person that put the PAP label into disrepute with his price-fixing scandal!! How is he different from the the match-fixer Eric Ding? Both have become super rich with their ill-gotten gains. Why is it one is behind bars, while the other is not even trialed?!?!
I am not the only one questioning PAP’s love here. EVEN PAP themselves have admitted – Senior Minister Josephine Teo said, “. . . love is not something the government can give . . .” There you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth. Why give PAP the vote, if they don’t love you?! I think it is about time you invest your future and happiness in someone who truly love both you and me!!
Professor MC First
TRS Contributor
Post date:
29 Apr 2015 - 5:54pm
[Pic Credit: RP]
Currently there are TWO scandals with the civil service. One involving the SCDF while the other involving IDA. You can very clearly see the exact position of the PAP government in their handling of these two lapses.
For the SCDF case, the headline in the Straits Times read - SCDF 'will leave no stone unturned' in video probe. I think it is really sad that when the case is against SINGAPOREANS, you say no stone will be left unturned. For the IDA case when HONESTY and INTEGRITY are at risk, you decided to take the word of a FOREIGNER!! Has the PAP government NO SHAME at all?!
I must reiterate, what the boys did in the SCDF video clip is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE. But they were passing out, so some euphoria may have gone to their head. Some of the description by the PAP internet brigade was really overboard and I will not quote any of it here. These remarks made against the Malays were totally uncalled for!!
Firemen are easily one of the bravest people around. They have to risk their lives and run into burning buildings!! If you ask me, they are certainly braver than ANY of our paper Generals, since none of them has never been to war before!! So, what is hurt/damaged here? Just a thrashed bunk. Worst case scenario, just bill the boys for ALL the repairs made.
This is entirely different from the IDA saga!! A foreigner used her MBA from a degree mill to get into IDA. The acceptance of her “toilet paper degree” is a huge insult to our education system which prides itself in MERITOCRACY!! This meritocracy was painfully built up by FIFTY years of hard work!! In the blink of an eye, HONESTY has been thrown out of the window and a CHEATING culture may actually prevail after this!!
SO, which one of the above is the more heinous crime?! WHY are there are always TWO standards? One for Singaporeans AND another one for Foreigners?! When Singaporean teen beat up a foreigner, Minister Shanmugam condemned it and said it was SICKENING. How come no comments were made when foreigners beat up Singaporean taxi-driver?!
Like every couple that goes through a breakup or divorce, they always like to ask, “Have you ever loved me at all?” This is one question that I really hope PAP can answer. Because on the surface, it seem that PAP had always been more interested in gaining political power rather than improving the people’s well-being. Where can you see that?
ONE, how come the JURY was removed from our justice system? Of course I understand that when there is a jury involved, sometimes criminals may get away scot-free. For instance, like OJ Simpson’s case. BUT, without a jury involved, the JUDGE now has way too much power in his hands. For instance, if there was a jury involved, will we ever find AMOS guilty of the charge made against him? Most likely not. But if this was ruled by a Judge, Amos’ chances certainly look bleak.
NEXT, the PAP introduced this thing call GRC which I have NEVER, EVER seen in any other First World country! Riding on the train to so call protect minority races, this GRC is the most powerful weapon in PAP’s arsenal and is supposed to perpetuate their power till the end of time. Of course, they did not count on us seeing through the smoke screen in less than 30 years since its introduction. I am sure they regret not changing the constitution to create a 87-member GRC now!! Perhaps, they are even thinking, why they never change Singapore’s system to a monarchy when they were holding on to so much power!!
Then, the concept of Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) was introduced. This scheme was supposed to introduce people who are NOT affiliated to any political party to represent an alternative voice for the people. INSTEAD, they made the infamous clown – Calvin Cheng a NMP. How can you accept an ex-PAP member to become a NMP?! He is the FIRST person that put the PAP label into disrepute with his price-fixing scandal!! How is he different from the the match-fixer Eric Ding? Both have become super rich with their ill-gotten gains. Why is it one is behind bars, while the other is not even trialed?!?!
I am not the only one questioning PAP’s love here. EVEN PAP themselves have admitted – Senior Minister Josephine Teo said, “. . . love is not something the government can give . . .” There you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth. Why give PAP the vote, if they don’t love you?! I think it is about time you invest your future and happiness in someone who truly love both you and me!!
Professor MC First
TRS Contributor
