Serious US Judge orders VW to pay USD$15 billion, PAP judge tells VW donch worry, bor taichee

[Papsmearer]

A U.S. federal judge in San Francisco has approved a $15 billion court settlement of most claims against Volkswagen for its emissions-cheating scandal.
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer signed the order Tuesday approving the largest auto-scandal settlement in U.S. history.

• VW reaches deal to compensate U.S. dealers for polluting diesels

​About 475,000 owners of VWs and Audis with 2-litre four-cylinder diesel engines now will be able to seek buybacks of their vehicles starting next Tuesday.

Most of the owners are expected to sell their cars back to VW after the company acknowledged cheating on emissions testing and putting dirty cars on the road. In addition to having their cars bought back, owners can each get cash payments of $5,100 to $10,000 US.
"The settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate," Breyer wrote in his order, posted Tuesday morning by the court.
VW will pay attorney fees and costs, including up to $324 million US in fees and $8.5 million in out-of-pocket costs.
[h=2]Larger engines not included[/h] The settlement releases legal claims from most of the 2-litre VW owners, but it doesn't affect larger 3-litre six-cylinder diesels, which also cheated on tests. The settlement also doesn't end any claims against parts supplier Robert Bosch, which drew up the cheating software.
The order says that 336,612 owners of 2-litre diesels have registered for the settlement and 3,298 have opted out.

 

[Papsmearer]

Re: US Judge orders VW to pay USD$15 billion, PAP judge tells VW donch worry, bor tai

In Zikapore justice system, PAP say VW donch have any problem. they will not initiate any lawsuit against them. If the owners want compensation, they have to each and severally sue VW themselves out of their own pocket. Shiok of not?

Volkswagen is facing its first lawsuit from a Singapore car owner who is demanding a full refund on his car because of the manufacturer's massive emission cheating scandal.

Businessman Sanjay Samnani, 44, wants Volkswagen Singapore to take back a VW Touran seven-seater he bought last April.
Just five months after his purchase, the motoring giant admitted fitting 11 million of its diesel cars with software that could detect when they were undergoing emission testing. On the road, however, the cars were found to emit up to 40 times their declared levels of nitrogen oxide.

Mr Samnani, who is filing the suit together with his mother through Parwani Law LLC, said: "We bought the car believing that it was environmentally friendlier. Now that this (cheating case) has happened, we feel ashamed of driving the car.
"It's a reputation thing."


Before resorting to filing a writ on Monday, Mr Samnani approached Volkswagen Singapore for a refund but was rejected.
He then tried to sell the car to Volkswagen's own used car division, Das WeltAuto, last November, but the company has not got back to him with a quote.
Volkswagen is facing similar legal actions in a number of countries.
In California, more than 500 suits have been filed since news of the scandal broke. The US Department of Justice is also filing a suit against the Volkswagen Group.
South Korea's Environment Ministry said in January that it would file criminal charges against VW's Korean unit. Earlier this month, France started a formal investigation into the German group.
But on Wednesday, a German court in the north-western city of Bochum threw out a lawsuit by an owner of a VW Tiguan demanding that the dealer who sold it take it back.
Initially, the court ordered the two parties to try and find an amicable settlement. But when they were unable to do so, the court was compelled to issue a ruling, finally finding in favour of the dealer.
The court was reported to have reasoned that the dealer did not fail in its duties. The dealer "cannot be made responsible for a fault committed by the carmaker", the ruling read.
But in the case of Volkswagen Singapore, the retailer and manufacturer are one and the same.
Mr Seah Seng Choon, executive director of the Consumers Association of Singapore, said: "Consumers are right to pursue the matter in court as this is a blatant attempt to misrepresent the fact.
"Consumers have the right to seek redress under the lemon law and they should do so to send a strong signal to the business that its deliberate misrepresentation is absolutely unacceptable."
A Volkswagen Group Singapore spokesman said: "We are in contact with the customer but are currently unable to comment on this topic as it is the subject of an ongoing internal and external review in Germany."