• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

UK beggars protest rally marched against Trident Nuke Spendings Video

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
2,741
Points
38
[video=youtube_share;kHTDRxTEuVM]http://youtu.be/kHTDRxTEuVM[/video]


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/27/cnd-rally-anti-nuclear-demonstration-trident-london

Trident rally is Britain's biggest anti-nuclear march in a generation

Thousands of protesters including Jeremy Corbyn and other party leaders gather in London for CND march and rally
Jeremy Corbyn addresses anti-Trident demonstration – video

Mark Townsend
@townsendmark

Saturday 27 February 2016 18.11 GMT
Last modified on Saturday 27 February 2016 18.47 GMT

Share on Pinterest
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Google+

Thousands of protesters have assembled in central London for Britain’s biggest anti-nuclear weapons rally in a generation.

Campaigners gathered from across the world: some said they had travelled from Australia to protest against the renewal of Trident. Others had come from the west coast of Scotland, where Britain’s nuclear deterrent submarines are based.

As the huge column of people began moving from Marble Arch after 1pm, the mood was buoyant and spirited despite the cold.

There’s never been a better time to join CND | Hannah Bullen

Naomi Young, 34, from Southampton said: “You can’t use nuclear weapons. You would destroy the environment and kill hundreds of thousands of people. Why spend £100bn to buy a weapon unless you want to destroy the earth?”

Many waved placards with phrases including “Books Not Bombs”, “Cut War Not Welfare” and “NHS Not Trident”.

A common theme among protesters was the cost of renewing Trident during a period of austerity.
Leanne Wood, Nicola Sturgeon and Caroline Lucas join protesters on the anti-Trident march.
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Leanne Wood, Nicola Sturgeon and Caroline Lucas join protesters on the anti-Trident march. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Andy Pomphrey, 67, from Hampshire, said: “It’s such an excessive amount of money for a weapons system when the NHS and junior doctors, are struggling.”

Kai Carrwright, 17, from Exeter said: “We are having to pay to go to university and yet they want to spend £100bn on something that can only lead to the destruction of life on Earth.”

The campaigners headed for Trafalgar Square where were addressed by the leaders of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Green party. The true draw – cited as an inspiration by many of those assembled – was the leader of the Labour party, Jeremy Corbyn, whose unswerving unilateralist stance has electrified the nuclear deterrent debate in a manner few could have foreseen.
Tens of thousands of people assemble in London for the anti-Trident campaign.
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Tens of thousands of people assemble in London for the anti-Trident campaign. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

As crowds built from midday close to the assembly point at Marble Arch, it quickly became evident that the event would mark the biggest anti-nuclear demonstration since 1983, when 300,000 gathered in London’s Hyde Park to demonstrate against the deployment of Cruise missiles at Greenham Common, Berkshire. Union officials, faith leaders, anti-nuclear activists and anti-war campaigners were evident. Stewards estimated the numbers ran into “many tens of thousands”.

Organisers of the march, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, were confident the turnout would send a robust message of growing support against renewing the nuclear weapons system – at an estimated cost of least £41bn – and argued that worries about job losses were a red herring.

Corbyn’s decision to address the rally later on Saturday has further exposed a faultline through the party, and he has been criticised by some for highlighting party splits on a key debate.
Protesters gather in Trafalgar Square.
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Protesters gather in Trafalgar Square. Photograph: Anthony Devlin/PA

Entering the stage to rapturous applause, he said that no one should forget the “absolute mass destruction on both sides” that would follow a nuclear attack and reiterated his “total horror of nuclear weapons, should they ever be used by anybody”.

Corbyn said he was elected Labour leader on a manifesto in which standing against the renewal of Trident was a key component.

He acknowledged the party’s role in the 1968 nuclear non-proliferation treaty and urged: “I want to see a Labour government that would adhere to all the articles of the non-proliferation treaty.”

The treaty had worked, given that most countries that did not have nuclear weapons at that time had not subsequently acquired them, Corbyn told the crowd. It was a credit to countries such as Argentina, South Africa and Brazil that both Africa and South America remained free of such weapons, he added.

The US, Russia and the UK signed the treaty, pledging their cooperation in stemming the spread of nuclear technology.

Corbyn, who said he joined the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament when he was 16, also made reference to those who questioned whether he should be attending the protest: “A lot of people said that maybe it was utterly relevant maybe you shouldn’t be there, but I want to be here because of my belief in a nuclear-free future.”

He said he chose to address the demonstration because he believed in a “different kind of politics in a different kind of world, a world that emphasises dealing with the crying needs of the poor and homeless in this country. Those that are going short and suffering public spending cuts.”

Earlier this week, union activists from the GMB attacked Corbyn over his stance on Trident, warning that tens of thousands of skilled jobs were dependent on parliamentary backing for renewal of the nuclear submarine programme.

He advocated re-investing some of the money allocated for Trident on keeping jobs in the affected areas.
Various badges at the rally.
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Various badges at the rally. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Actor Vanessa Redgrave, Rou Reynolds of rock band Enter Shikari, and comedian Francesca Martinez also addressed the rally. Other high-profile speakers include writer and priest Giles Fraser, and the writer Tariq Ali.

The rally received support from a number of cultural figures including bands Young Fathers and Massive Attack. Fashion designer Katharine Hamnett recently unveiled a new Stop Trident T-shirt range while Portishead’s Geoff Barrow is currently mixing a single in support of the campaign.

Family life: Gran and me at a CND rally, One Day More from Les Misérables, and cheggy bread

The event also received significant international support with campaigners from Japan, the only country to have suffered an attack by an atomic bomb, urging Britain to work towards disarmament.

Gensuikyo, the Japan Council against A and H Bombs, joined similar organisations from France, Switzerland, Italy, New Zealand and the US in sending messages of support and solidarity to the CND, the organisers of Saturday’s demonstration.

The Successor programme to replace the four Vanguard nuclear armed submarines currently carrying Trident missiles is now priced at £31bn, with a further £10bn set aside for unforeseen risks.

A parliamentary vote on renewing Trident is expected later in the year.
 
On the other hand Obama's FINAL BUDGET trying to get unprecedented huge spending for war toys, no way the Congress will grant so much, the bankrupt economy will afford not so much new debts:

http://www.janes.com/article/57623/pentagon-budget-2017-obama-s-last-budget

Pentagon budget 2017: Obama's last budget
Zachary Fryer-Biggs, Washington, DC and Daniel Wasserbly, Washington, DC and Marina Malenic, Washington, DC and Grace Jean, Washington, DC and Geoff Fein, Washington, DC - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
02 February 2016
The Lockheed Martin F-35, which is scheduled for increased production in 2016 and 2017 and a greater portion of the modernisation budget. Source: Lockheed Martin
Key Points

FY 2017 budget expected to include about USD526 billion base budget and USD59 billion for OCO
Tech offset initiative to drive about USD15 billion in funding
Several large strategic decisions on budget structure expected to get pushed to next president as this budget is Obama's final in office

The Pentagon is due to release the last budget request of President Barack Obama's administration on 9 February, in the midst of several seismic shifts in the national security world. An administration that began with promises to withdraw troops from the Middle East and early on was saddled with legislation capping defence spending, is now confronting increased operations against the Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria, as well as discussion of increasing the US role in Afghanistan.

In the midst of those needs, several large programmes are coming of age requiring increased funding, such as the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter and the Long-Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B). Yet another requirement, the recapitalisation of the three legs of the nuclear triad, is looming as a major bill that officials cite as unaccounted for in current budget plans.

Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter is due to give a speech on 2 February outlining some of the priorities that will appear in the budget.

The late 2015 budget deal reached by then-Speaker of the House John Boehner and the White House altered the existing budget caps for base budget spending in 2016 and 2017, adding about USD25 billion to each year. Although those levels place the base budget still below the Pentagon's previous requests, the relief can be bolstered by the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund, which does not face the cap.

The baseline of USD551 billion for national defence in fiscal year 2017 (FY 2017), with about USD526 billion for the Pentagon, is expected to be joined by about USD59 billion in OCO spending, although there have been rumours that the White House will push to increase that figure given the pace of operations against the Islamic State.

Want to read more? For analysis on this article and access to all our insight content, please enquire about our subscription options ihs.com/contact
 
Back
Top