• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

UK: Afghan muslim migrant thieves use gay dating app to gain access to victims’ houses

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
15,849
Points
113
Rahmat Khan Mohammadi and Mohammed Bilal Hotak were alleged to have been hostile towards their victims’ sexuality.

Two Afghan migrants who exploited the dating app Grindr to deceive victims and gain entry to their homes were jailed at Isleworth Crown Court on Monday.

Rahmat Khan Mohammadi, 23, received a five-year sentence while Mohammed Bilal Hotak, 27, was handed three-and-a-half years behind bars.

The pair operated as part of an organised crime network, stealing phones, passports and wallets worth £68,000 during a six-month period ending in March this year.

Their scheme involved pretending to have romantic interest in men they contacted through the LGBT platform, subsequently arranging to visit their targets at home.

The wider criminal operation was responsible for 35 burglaries and 20 connected fraud offences across London during this timeframe.

The criminals typically established Grindr profiles without photographs, sending images of other people when potential victims requested to see them.

Once a meeting was arranged through the app's messaging function, Mohammadi would sometimes ask to bring along a friend - in reality, his accomplice Hotak.

After entering a victim's residence, the pair would request that music be played, specifically choosing YouTube because the phone could not be locked whilst a video was running.

They would then obtain the device's password before creating a distraction to make the victim leave the room - excuses ranged from needing a shower to asking for directions to the toilet.

Upon the victim's return, the perpetrators and the mobile phone would be gone, with the stolen passwords subsequently used for contactless payments or direct bank transfers.

The judge carefully considered this argument but concluded the men did not act from hostility towards their victims' sexual orientation.

Instead, she determined they viewed Grindr as "an opportunity to gain easy access into the homes of the victims" and targeted individuals for their perceived vulnerability.

She added: "I suspect you were - and I put no higher than that - banking on the victims not reporting the crime."

One victim described losing irreplaceable photographs of deceased relatives stored on his stolen phone, later requiring hospital treatment for severe psychological trauma.
 
Back
Top