• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

To subsidise or to nationalise - which would you prefer?

myo539

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
3,101
Points
48
It appears that some people disagree with the gahment spending $1.1 billion dollars to improve bus services, but they appear to agree with the WP's plan to spend billions more dollars to nationalise public transport - and health care?

Would you prefer WP to use the billions of dollars in Temasek Holdings and GIC to nationalise public transport?
 
I remember when our public transport was run by private companies.

So why not go back to that?
 
pappies interpretation of SUBSIDISE is not same meaning as dictionary
 
Back
Top