• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

This is how China fights corruption!!

tualingong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
1,263
Points
0
By stopping the spread of news about corruption!! Cheaper than LKY million dollar salaries!!! :D

Totally Wrap Minds, the Chinese Civilization!! LOL! :D

[h=1]China Toughens Its Restrictions on Use of the Internet[/h]
china-articleLarge.jpg
How Hwee Young/European Pressphoto Agency
New measures by the Chinese government could chill some of the vibrant discourse on Twitter-like microblogs.


[h=6]By KEITH BRADSHER[/h] [h=6]Published: December 28, 2012[/h] HONG KONG — The Chinese government issued new rules on Friday requiring Internet users to provide their real names to service providers, while assigning Internet companies greater responsibility for deleting forbidden postings and reporting them to the authorities.


[h=4]Connect With Us on Twitter[/h] Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
Twitter List: Reporters and Editors



The decision came as government censors have sharply stepped up restrictions on China’s international Internet traffic in recent weeks. The restrictions are making it harder for businesses to protect commercial secrets and for individuals to view overseas Web sites that the Chinese Communist Party deems politically sensitive.
The new regulations, issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, allow Internet users to continue to adopt pseudonyms for their online postings, but only if they first provide their real names to service providers, a measure that could chill some of the vibrant discourse on the country’s Twitter-like microblogs. The authorities periodically detain and even jail Internet users for politically sensitive comments, such as calls for a multiparty democracy or accusations of impropriety by local officials.
Any entity providing Internet access, including over fixed-line or mobile phones, “should when signing agreements with users or confirming provision of services, demand that users provide true information about their identities,” the committee ordered.
In recent weeks, Internet users in China have exposed a series of sexual and financial scandals that have led to the resignations or dismissals of at least 10 local officials. International news media have also published a series of reports in recent months on the accumulation of wealth by the family members of China’s leaders, and some Web sites carrying such reports, including Bloomberg’s and the English- and Chinese-language sites of The New York Times, have been assiduously blocked, while Internet comments about them have been swiftly deleted.
The regulations issued Friday build on a series of similar administrative guidelines and municipal rules issued over the past year. China’s mostly private Internet service providers have been slow to comply with them, fearing the reactions of their customers. The committee’s decision has much greater legal force, and puts far more pressure on Chinese Internet providers to comply more quickly and more comprehensively, Internet specialists said.
In what appeared to be an effort to make the decision more palatable to the Chinese public, the committee also included a mandate for businesses in China to be more cautious in gathering and protecting electronic data.
“Nowadays on the Internet there are very serious problems with citizens’ personal electronic information being recklessly collected, used without approval, illegally disclosed, and even traded and sold,” Li Fei, a deputy director of the committee’s legislative affairs panel, said on Friday at a news conference in Beijing. “There are also a large number of cases of invasive attacks on information systems to steal personal electronic information, as well as lawbreaking on the Internet through swindles and through defaming and slandering others.”
Mr. Li denied that the government was seeking to prevent the exposure of corruption.
“When citizens exercise these rights according to the law, no organization or individual can use any reason or excuse to interfere, and cannot suppress them or exact revenge,” he said. “At the same time, when citizens exercise their rights, including through use of the Internet, they should stay within the bounds of the Constitution and the laws, and must not harm the legitimate rights and interests of the state, society, the collective or of other citizens.”
A spokesman for the National People’s Congress said that 145 members of the committee voted in favor of the new rules, with 5 abstaining and 1 voting against them.
The requirement for real names appeared to be aimed particularly at cellphone companies and other providers of mobile Internet access. At the news conference, an official from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Zhao Zhiguo, said that nearly all fixed-line services now had real-name registration, but that only about 70 percent of mobile phones were registered under real names.
The authorities have made it harder in the last several years to buy a cellphone chip with a new phone number anonymously. New buyers are required to register with their identity documents before making international calls.
“To implement the relevant requirements of this decision, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology will improve its regulatory system and draft a detailed implementation plan to fully develop authenticated identity administration for telephone users,” Mr. Zhao said.
China’s censors have begun blocking more foreign Web sites and, in recent weeks, have sharply stepped up the blocking of virtual private networks, or VPNs. A VPN is a tool for encrypted computer communication that is widely used by businesses and individuals in China to protect against prying by the government and state-owned enterprises, and to circumvent China’s blocking of a long and lengthening list of overseas Web sites that cover subjects the government considers politically sensitive.
The Chinese government has been experimenting over the past two years with ways to identify and block VPNs, said Xiao Qiang, the leader of a team of Chinese Internet researchers at the University of California, Berkeley. But the government did not begin deploying that capability on a considerable scale until September, and it has stepped up its use of blocking since then, particularly in the weeks leading up to the Communist Party’s National Congress in early November, he said.
Although many had expected the blocking of Web sites and VPNs to recede after the party congress, that has not happened. Mr. Xiao said that the Chinese blocking of VPNs was “technically savvy and politically self-destructive,” in that it may allow the authorities to more effectively monitor communications and interfere with the dissemination of politically sensitive information, but at a high price in terms of antagonizing computer users across China.
Taken together, political analysts said, the various Internet moves suggest that while the new team of leaders selected at the party congress may be talking about reforms, including further opening of the economy to international competition, the new leaders remain very wary of freer political discourse, and may even pursue further restrictions.
A review of search terms on Google, one way of tracking subjects of interest in China, shows a surge in searches for the term “VPN” that began in late August, peaked in early November at the start of the party congress and has stayed high ever since.
Deng Xiaoping, China’s paramount leader in the 1980s and 1990s, famously observed that in opening up the country’s economy to the world after the Cultural Revolution, some “flies” would inevitably come in. Bill Bishop, a social media specialist based in Beijing, said that the latest policy moves suggested, “They’ve got some very smart computer scientists trying to figure out how to keep the digital flies away.
 
They can apply their laws in china but what about those ah tongs station overseas do they need to follow. If they don't will they fly overseas to catch them?
 
why u so free to say other countries? sinking land sibeh good izzit?

limpeh tell u go look at pappies garberment first. typical chow sinkee, own home proeblem dont worry go and worry neighbour problem. u deserve to be screw by pappies.
 
KMT need to take back China from those communist crooks!

反攻大陆!!!Singaporean Chinese like me the first one to join in the retake of China forces!!!

[video=youtube;P8ZbcFSsqmQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8ZbcFSsqmQ[/video]
 
Last edited:
Salute to the ROC troops!!!

[video=youtube;eco7RsHNqyk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eco7RsHNqyk[/video]
 
Last edited:
The only hope is on Republic Of China to re-organise their army into a mighty fighting forces to retake China from the Communist hand and save our China mainland from the corrupted, evil and gangster Communist gangster group.

[video=youtube;Op6Ewrbe_S4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op6Ewrbe_S4[/video]

China produce the most world population.If corruption continue, its like dynamo.... you corrupt i corrupt... everyone will be in this corruption shit!!!
As a Singaporean Chinese, my wish and the only wish is to join in the ROC to retake Mainland.I will die in peace!!!
 
Ang mor is still the best.

chinks pls fuck one side.
 
It May Be Difficult To Convince Them

KMT need to take back China from those communist crooks!

Not all mainland Chinese are willing to trade CCP away for a KMT lead China. Some have already been brainwashed by Mao's or Lee's way of upbringing to think that they saved the land from 'destruction'.

Can you sway the 60% ? You had to use force on SAF to free their (NSmen's) fear. As for the PRC's PLA, it may not be easy. You need to feel the sentiment there. I still prefer to use force. With a fighting force, people will become emboldened to stand out to oppose the regime.
 
IF KMT so good,,they would not have lost the civil war to the commies in the 1st place,,,there is no way KMT can retake china,,,

The only hope is on Republic Of China to re-organise their army into a mighty fighting forces to retake China from the Communist hand and save our China mainland from the corrupted, evil and gangster Communist gangster group.

[video=youtube;Op6Ewrbe_S4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op6Ewrbe_S4[/video]

China produce the most world population.If corruption continue, its like dynamo.... you corrupt i corrupt... everyone will be in this corruption shit!!!
As a Singaporean Chinese, my wish and the only wish is to join in the ROC to retake Mainland.I will die in peace!!!
 
IF KMT so good,,they would not have lost the civil war to the commies in the 1st place,,,there is no way KMT can retake china,,,


the criminal folly of the disastrous Marshall Mission destroyed the Kuomintang's military superiority over the Communist and turned the tide of the war in favor of the Communist. George Marshall imposed an arms embargo on the ROC. from 1946 to 1948: the KMT eventually ran out of munitions to fight the Communist who were heavily aided by Russian unlimited military aid. a key reason for the KMT civil war defeat. George Marshall single-handedly gave China away to the Communist.





the Chinese netizens can watch copyrighted US. Japan. Korea. movies and videos online. internet porn are also widely available. the Chinese government censorship on China's internet not so bad. :D
 
It was due to the incompetence of the KMT and Chaing Kai Shek and his slut wife,,,that the Nationalists lost to the Commies..but I admit the Japs were the best thing for the commies as they stop the KMT from attacking the Commies,,,,

But if the KMT were less corrupt and fought the japs well, there was no way the commies could have won the civil war...

the criminal folly of the disastrous Marshall Mission destroyed the Kuomintang's military superiority over the Communist and turned the tide of the war in favor of the Communist. George Marshall imposed an arms embargo on the ROC. from 1946 to 1948: the KMT eventually ran out of munitions to fight the Communist who were heavily aided by Russian unlimited military aid. a key reason for the KMT civil war defeat. George Marshall single-handedly gave China away to the Communist.





the Chinese netizens can watch copyrighted US. Japan. Korea. movies and videos online. internet porn are also widely available. the Chinese government censorship on China's internet not so bad. :D
 
Whoever wants to do something "funny" must be first rich, powerful and have strong family backing... Too bad for Bo xilai... Wrong fight for leadership!
 
It was due to the incompetence of the KMT and Chaing Kai Shek and his slut wife,,,that the Nationalists lost to the Commies..but I admit the Japs were the best thing for the commies as they stop the KMT from attacking the Commies,,,,

But if the KMT were less corrupt and fought the japs well, there was no way the commies could have won the civil war...


Mr.Chiang Kai Shek and the KMT government were frequently accused of maladministration and corruption. what happened back then: China's misfortune were not totally the fault of the KMT. for eg. the inflation was the unavoidable result of a long war. corruption was inevitable with a country that were down and out economically. the hyperinflation resulted in the rising corruption among the KMT officials. these people's money salaries were worthless. they would not resist the temptation not to graft and take black money in order to feed their families.

General Albert Wedemeyer said that if he was a Chinese official during that time, he would find it very hard not to be corrupt too.

Wedemeyer had a special knowledge of Chinese affairs, observed at close range. even this great man couldn't understand the extent of the huge problems faced by the Chiang Nationalist government during those years. Wedemeyer would often accuse Chiang's cronies of incompetence and corruption too.

in 1958. Wedemeyer released his memoir and concluded the China story with the below.
"Thinking back through the years, I now freely acknowledge that I myself was not sufficiently cognizant of the almost insuperable problems faced by the Chinese Nationalist Government."



imo. Chiang Kai Shek tried his best to rule over a fragmented nation, impossible to govern huge country for 20 years. the Communist had total control over China. the Country were at peace. the Communist still did an awful job of running the country for the next 30 years after 1949.
 
Last edited:
Mr.Chiang Kai Shek and the KMT government were frequently accused of maladministration and corruption.

If all the generals were corrupted, would he have killed all of them and having none to fight the commies? You must remember that they had been with the Manchus for many years and its hard for them to embrace the Fraternity concept. Yes, at that time, it was almost impossible.
 
imo. Chiang Kai Shek tried his best to rule over a fragmented nation, impossible to govern huge country for 20 years. the Communist had total control over China. the Country were at peace. the Communist still did an awful job of running the country for the next 30 years after 1949.

You are right. Even with the corruption in KMT, the damages and sufferings done to the country in it's 20 years rule is nothing compared to the sufferings and damages done by the Communist in the next 30 years under Mao.
 
Back
Top