• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Temasek’s us$10 billion dollar bets carry unnecessary, huge risks

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=1]TEMASEK’S US$10 BILLION DOLLAR BETS CARRY UNNECESSARY, HUGE RISKS[/h]
Post date:
7 Feb 2015 - 6:12pm








Temasek should improve its transparency and publish ALL information on its investments similar toNorway’s Government Pension Fund Global. When a fund 5 times the size of Temasek is able to publish its entire holding of more than 8,000 equities, why does Temasek only disclose its 42 major investments in 2013 and 46 in 2014?
Moreover, Temasek’s investments have already been compiled by financial data vendors and are available online. Citizens are the owners of our reserves and it is our right to have access to such information. A listed securities portfolio of 74 investments in 2013 is enclosed at the bottom of this post.
The top ten listed investments in market value made up 50% of Temasek’s total assets. Unlike other funds where risk is diversified, Temasek seems to be trying to put as many eggs into one basket as possible with an 18% stake in Standard Chartered PLC and 7% in China Construction Bank, more than S$30 billion invested in 2 foreign banks.
(Market value in US$ million)
.SecurityShares%Market valueCountrySectorTicker
1SINGAPORE TELECOM LTD8,283,957,56851.9626430SINGAPORETelecomST SP
2CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK-H17,878,670,0507.4414920CHINAFinancials939 HK
3STANDARD CHARTERED PLC432,746,14517.8810450BRITAINFinancialsSTAN LN
4DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD713,033,74929.229910SINGAPOREFinancialsDBS SP
5SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD657,800,74856.116000SINGAPOREIndustrialsSIA SP
6SINGAPORE TECH ENGINEERING1,559,393,44350.265460SINGAPOREIndustrialsSTE SP
7CAPITALAND LTD1,680,704,14039.485080SINGAPOREFinancialsCAPL SP
8SHIN CORP PCL1,334,354,82541.623950THAILANDTelecomINTUCH TB
9SEMBCORP INDUSTRIES LTD883,919,08849.473540SINGAPOREIndustrialsSCI SP
10KEPPEL CORP LTD377,344,42520.893290SINGAPOREIndustrialsKEP SP
...TotalUS$89 bil
Both investments will have no room for error because their potential losses will dwarf losses of smaller investments.
Has Temasek not learnt any lesson from its US$4.6 billion loss in its Merrill Lynch investment andUS$1.5 billion (80%) loss in Barclays Bank?

By placing bets of more than US$10 billion on any investment, Temasek has taken risks on behalf of Singaporeans, risks which we would not have assumed. If Temasek’s own costly mistakes are insufficient, it should learn from GIC’s S$14 billion UBS bet in 2007 which is still 40%* underwater after 7 years. (*inclusive of 18% interest payment, dividends and recent forex gains)
Should both banks fail spectacularly, will Lee Kuan Yew step in and tell us that Temasek intends to “keep for the next two to three decades and grow with them”?
Standard Chartered investment has been in Temasek’s stable for almost a decade, currently sitting on paper losses of at least 30% without any turnaround in sight. Was this part of Temasek’s investment strategy?

Standard Chartered’s entire profits last year may have been wiped out by the collapse in commodity prices and there appears to be another rights issue on the horizon.
Although dividend payments could have made up for most of the capital loss, including rights issue, forex loss could still amount to some 25% after almost a decade.

Should Temasek decide to divest Standard Chartered at current prices, the net loss would be at least S$3 billion. It will take numerous $10 million/$100 million investments to make up for a single huge loss. By taking up such a huge stake, all exits have now been shut and it will take a miracle to dispose of Standard Chartered at a profit.
In 2011, Temasek had indicated it wanted to trim its Standard Chartered stake when it raisedS$650 million from the sale of zero coupon exchangeable bonds maturing in 2014. Since the bonds were fully redeemed in 2014, Temasek had missed the only opportunity to reduce its holding when the price was more favourable.
Should Temasek realise billion-dollar losses, there will also be political backlash and Temasek appears to be aware of this. Despite stock market making new highs, Standard Chartered shares have gone in the opposite direction. What happens when global stock market tanks?
Temasek’s major investments in China’s financial sector appear to be more profitable but an analysis would be required to confirm this.
China’s double-digit growth during most of the last 2 decades are over. China’s growth story has been based on the expansion of credit – some US$15 trillion after the last financial crisis with a significant amount for financing infrastructure and real estate which includes ghost cities generating zero return. Investments at the tail end of China’s phenomenal ‘growth’ carry significant risks.
Video of China’s ghost cities
In April 2014, a Forbes article reported that Li Ka Shing and his family had been “on a selling spree in Mainland China since last August (2013)”. Li was way ahead of most foreign investors when it came to investing in China whereas Temasek has only recently committed tens of billion$ of our reserves.
Excluding GLCs transferred to Temasek, Temasek does not appear to be investing but speculating andgoing for the kill with its $10 billion investments.
Temasek seems to be in a hurry to make as much money as possible with humongous bets which are extremely risky. As a significant shareholder in many foreign companies, Temasek is unable to divest during times of great volatility. Temasek should diversify and not make US$10 billion dollar bets which carry unnecessary risks.
**
I have been trying to verify Temasek’s ridiculously high TSR and no luck so far. What I do is Google ‘Temasek’ and ‘name of investment’ and pieces of interesting information will show up on the screen. Frequently, data may not be complete and this is the result of Temasek’s conscious effort not to allow the public to scrutinise its performance. Should others be able to confirm Temasek’s 16% 40-year TSR, please share the information.
2013 May – Temasek listed securities portfolio.
.NAMEMKT VALTICKER
1SINGAPORE TELECOM LTD26430ST SP
2CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK-H14920939 HK
3STANDARD CHARTERED PLC10450STAN LN
4DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD9910DBS SP
5SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD6000SIA SP
6SINGAPORE TECH ENGINEERING5460STE SP
7CAPITALAND LTD5080CAPL SP
8SHIN CORP PCL3950INTUCH TB
9SEMBCORP INDUSTRIES LTD3540SCI SP
10KEPPEL CORP LTD3290KEP SP
11IND & COMM BK OF CHINA-H32701398 HK
12SP AUSNET2190SPN AU
13REPSOL SA1920REP SM
14NEPTUNE ORIENT LINES LTD1530NOL SP
15BANK OF CHINA LTD-H15203988 HK
16LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS INC1310LVLT US
17SATS LTD1230SATS SP
18MOSAIC CO/THE1190MOS US
19MAPLETREE LOGISTICS TRUST1060MLT SP
20MAPLETREE COMMERCIAL TRUST970MCT SP
21SMRT CORP LTD951MRT SP
22EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG853EVK GR
23OLAM INTERNATIONAL LTD832OLAM SP
24HUTCHISON PORT HOLDINGS TR-780HPHT SP
25MAPLETREE INDUSTRIAL TRUST625MINT SP
26STATS CHIPPAC LTD619STAT SP
27QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL HOLD376Q US
28MEG ENERGY CORP295MEG CN
29NEW CHINA LIFE INSURANCE C-H2861336 HK
30CHENIERE ENERGY INC277LNG US
31TURQUOISE HILL RESOURCES LTD266TRQ US
32SHANGHAI PHARMACEUTICALS-H2462607 HK
33CITYSPRING INFRASTRUCTURE TR224CITY SP
34CITIC SECURITIES CO LTD-H1926030 HK
35CITIC RESOURCES HOLDINGS LTD1191205 HK
36AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC115APD US
37FACEBOOK INC-A114FB US
38KEPPEL REIT92KREIT SP
39BAIDU INC – SPON ADR90BIDU US
40LAI FUNG HOLDINGS LTD821125 HK
41ZOOMLION HEAVY INDUSTRY – H751157 HK
42COSCO CORP SINGAPORE LTD71COS SP
43EXPEDITORS INTL WASH INC66EXPD US
44PETROLEO BRASILEIRO-SPON ADR63PBR/A US
45MONSANTO CO60MON US
46HUANENG RENEWABLES CORP-H52958 HK
47NEWOCEAN ENERGY HLDGS LTD46342 HK
48SAM ENGINEERING & EQUIPMENT39SEQB MK
49COACH INC35COH US
50AMYRIS INC33AMRS US
51TIGER AIRWAYS HOLDINGS LTD32TGR SP
53POTASH CORP OF SASKATCHEWAN31POT US
52ASCOTT RESIDENCE TRUST31ART SP
55ASIAN CITRUS HOLDINGS LTD26ACHL LN
54MARIN SOFTWARE INC26MRIN US
56CAPITACOMMERCIAL TRUST19CCT SP
57CLEAN ENERGY FUELS CORP18CLNE US
58SEADRILL LTD16SDRL US
59APPLE INC16AAPL US
60YY INC-ADR14YY US
61PEABODY ENERGY CORP13BTU US
63AMTEK ENGINEERING LTD10AMTK SP
62CHENIERE ENERGY PARTNERS LP10CQP US
64CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS INC8CF US
65AGRIUM INC7AGU CN
66ISOFTSTONE HOLDINGS LTD-ADS6ISS US
67SHOUGANG CONCORD TECH HLD6521 HK
68DYNA-MAC HOLDINGS LTD6DMHL SP
69MELCO CROWN ENTERTAINME-ADR5MPEL US
70CEI CONTRACT MANUFACTURING5CEI SP
71INTREPID POTASH INC5IPI US
72SEMBCORP MARINE LTD4SMM SP
73SINGAPORE POST LTD0.7SPOST SP
74M DREAM INWORLD LTD0.088100 HK
.TOTAL MARKET VALUEUS$113.5 bil






2012 Sep
.NAMEMKT VALTICKER
1SINGAPORE TELECOM LTD23660ST SP
2CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK-H12220939 HK
3STANDARD CHARTERED PLC10400STAN LN
4DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD8400DBS SP
5SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD5790SIA SP
6SINGAPORE TECH ENGINEERING4430STE SP
7CAPITALAND LTD4410CAPL SP
8SEMBCORP INDUSTRIES LTD4090SCI SP
9KEPPEL CORP LTD3540KEP SP
10SHIN CORP PCL2980INTUCH TB
11IND & COMM BK OF CHINA-H26201398 HK
12SP AUSNET1800SPN AU
13NEPTUNE ORIENT LINES LTD1630NOL SP
14BANK OF CHINA LTD-H11703988 HK
15MOSAIC CO/THE1160MOS US
16SMRT CORP LTD1120MRT SP
17SATS LTD1040SATS SP
18MAPLETREE LOGISTICS TRUST918MLT SP
19HUTCHISON PORT HOLDINGS TR-U766HPHT SP
20MAPLETREE COMMERCIAL TRUST742MCT SP
21OLAM INTERNATIONAL LTD663OLAM SP
22MAPLETREE INDUSTRIAL TRUST556MINT SP
23STATS CHIPPAC LTD535STAT SP
24MEG ENERGY CORP461MEG CN
25INMET MINING CORPORATION394IMN CN
26CHENIERE ENERGY INC258LNG US
27NEW CHINA LIFE INSURANCE C-H2291336 HK
28SHANGHAI PHARMACEUTICALS-H2192607 HK
29TIGER AIRWAYS HOLDINGS LTD204TGR SP
30CITYSPRING INFRASTRUCTURE TR201CITY SP
31CITIC SECURITIES CO LTD-H1566030 HK
32SHANGRI-LA HOTELS (MAL) BHD140SHMB MK
33CITIC RESOURCES HOLDINGS LTD1261205 HK
34BLACKROCK INC114BLK US
35COSCO CORP SINGAPORE LTD91COS SP
36BAIDU INC – SPON ADR78BIDU US
37PETROLEO BRASILEIRO-SPON ADR75PBR/A US
38LAI FUNG HOLDINGS LTD581125 HK
39TURQUOISE HILL RESOURCES LTD50TRQ CN
40SAM ENGINEERING & EQUIPMENT48SEQB MK
41ASIAN CITRUS HOLDINGS LTD32ACHL LN
42ISHARES S&P 500 INDEX FUND27IVV US
43SPDR S&P 500 ETF TRUST26SPY US
44CLEAN ENERGY FUELS CORP23CLNE US
45HUANENG RENEWABLES CORP-H20958 HK
46AMYRIS INC19AMRS US
47SEMBCORP MARINE LTD18SMM SP
48MELCO CROWN ENTERTAINME-ADR17MPEL US
49PEABODY ENERGY CORP16BTU US
50CAPITACOMMERCIAL TRUST16CCT SP
51SEADRILL LTD15SDRL NO
53ISOFTSTONE HOLDINGS LTD-ADS8ISS US
52MINDRAY MEDICAL INTL LTD-ADR8MR US
55ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO-CL A6ANF US
54SHOUGANG CONCORD TECH HLD6521 HK
56CEI CONTRACT MANUFACTURING5CEI SP
57AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROU4AIG US
58MONSANTO CO4MON US
59SUNNINGDALE TECH LTD4SUNN SP
60SICHUAN MEIFENG CHEM INDUS-A3000731 CH
61KOSMOS ENERGY LTD2KOS US
63DYNA-MAC HOLDINGS LTD2DMHL SP
62POTASH CORP OF SASKATCHEWAN1POT CN
64SINGAPORE POST LTD0.58SPOST SP
65NQ MOBILE INC – ADR0.27NQ US
66M DREAM INWORLD LTD0.068100 HK
.TOTAL MARKET VALUE97824.91


Phillip Ang
*The writer blogs at https://likedatosocanmeh.wordpress.com/
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is one reason why we MUST have a strong opposition in Parliament ,not let ANY party hold more than 2/3 of the seats and not allow a PM to serve more than 2 terms.

Silliporeans are now paying the price -the CPF minimum sum being one of the painful ones-interlinked with the high cost of public housing.
 

krafty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
mixed thoughts on temasek, they are moderately high risk investment firm and they pay high coupon. on the other hand they may pay high and not let you take out your principle. also, when they pay high yield also mean that they borrow expensively(in this case, i think they dun need as they have our cpf fund to dig in readily). lehman bros is junk bond, pay low coupon and went bust...so in the end, s&p is merely a rating agency that need overhaul of their criteria for rating. 2 cents worth, let me know if you think otherwise.
 
Top